PDA

View Full Version : Global Cooling.............


KD5ZPG
07-21-2008, 01:44 AM
Addressing the Washington Policymakers in Seattle, WA, Dr. Don Easterbrook said that shifting of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) from its warm mode to its cool mode virtually assures global cooling for the next 25-30 years and means that the global warming of the past 30 years is over. (http://icecap.us/images/uploads/WashingtonPolicymakersaddress.pdf)


KD5ZPG

n7wr
07-21-2008, 03:04 AM
You'll never convince the global warming idiots. Besides, their focus on global warming has achieved their real objective which is to destroy the U S economy. The radicals can't beat us militarily but they've found a way to do it economically. They're doing it socially and culturally too with their support for illegal immigration.

W4DFW
07-21-2008, 03:08 AM
Just ANOTHER accident, folks!! Nothing to see here.

MOVE ALONG!! MOVE ALONG now!!

kb3laz
07-21-2008, 04:01 AM
If I put my globe in my freezer It will be cool.:D

n2ize
07-21-2008, 04:14 AM
You'll never convince the global warming idiots. Besides, their focus on global warming has achieved their real objective which is to destroy the U S economy. The radicals can't beat us militarily but they've found a way to do it economically.


You can't be serious. Then again, I am dealing wirth Ham Radio Operators. In any event, I think Bush and the neokons have taken care of destroying the economy.


They're doing it socially and culturally too with their support for illegal immigration.

I think Bush has taken care of that one too.

G8ADD
07-21-2008, 07:16 AM
Its funny how some of you people regard the scientific conclusions of hundreds of climate scientists as completely debunked by the conclusion of one man!

For my part, I looked at figure three and was amazed by one of the most unscrupulously fiddled extrapolations that I have ever been priviledged to see in a scientific paper: the way the blue line plunges is completely spurious, if you take the first couple of years on their own the blue line could have been given the same sort of plunge but the continuation of the graph shows that this would have been false. If this is the standard to which this work has been conducted elsewhere then I doubt it is worth the weight of the electrons in my computer graphic! I shall wait and see.

73

Brian G8ADD

WB5HQH
07-21-2008, 05:21 PM
October 29, 2003- http://www.globalwarming.org/node/131
two Canadians with expertise in statistical analysis, Stephen McIntyre and economics professor Ross McKitrick--- These are Americans but not United States types, tested the hockey puck data and found it was in error. Not on a Climate basis, just on the math.
In another post of mine I looked at just my town and couldn't see any increase.
I will gladly change my view when presented with new correct data that warrants it. I don't take political bashing talk that is just opinion and not based on any facts. If you have something concrete to offer, please do. Just saying your right or wrong based on someone else's "tea leaves" doesn't impress me one bit.
If you have the expertise of Dr. Gray's level, I will listen and probably take your opinion that is based on something else than math. If not you will need a valid basis for spreading your view whether it is right or wrong. A person can be incorrect and still be a upstanding guy if he has a solid foundation. If he is spewing talk that is just against someone else just because he doesn't like that person or his associates, then he is not an upstanding person, just a petty one.

G8ADD
07-21-2008, 05:49 PM
October 29, 2003-
I will gladly change my view when presented with new correct data that warrants it. I don't take political bashing talk that is just opinion and not based on any facts. If you have something concrete to offer, please do. Just saying your right or wrong based on someone else's "tea leaves" doesn't impress me one bit.
If you have the expertise of Dr. Gray's level, I will listen and probably take your opinion that is based on something else than math. If not you will need a valid basis for spreading your view whether it is right or wrong. A person can be incorrect and still be a upstanding guy if he has a solid foundation. If he is spewing talk that is just against someone else just because he doesn't like that person or his associates, then he is not an upstanding person, just a petty one.

This follows my post. Was it aimed at me?

73

Brian G8ADD