PDA

View Full Version : The ARRL Letter, Vol 27, No 11 (Thursday, March 20, 2008)


AA7BQ
03-20-2008, 09:50 PM
IN THIS EDITION:

* Hams on Hand as Tornados Sweep through Georgia, Downtown Atlanta
* Station Locator Service New for Field Day 2008
* "The Doctor Is IN" the ARRL Letter
* ARRL Membership Newsletters, Bulletins and Notifications
* National Hurricane Conference Set for April
* EMCOMMWEST Coming to Reno in May
* Emmett Freitas, AE6Z (SK)
* Solar Update
* IN BRIEF:
This Weekend on the Radio
ARRL Continuing Education Course Registration

Reminder: The ARRL Letter is posting one day early, Thursday, March 20,
due to the ARRL closing in observance of Good Friday. There will be no
ARRL Audio News on Friday, March 21.

================================================== =========
==>Delivery problems: First see FAQ
<http://www.arrl.org/members-only/faq.html#nodelivery> (http://www.arrl.org/members-only/faq.html#nodelivery), then e-mail
<letter-dlvy@arrl.org> (letter-dlvy@arrl.org)
==>Editorial questions or comments only: S. Khrystyne Keane,
<k1sfa@arrl.org> (k1sfa@arrl.org)
================================================== =========

==> HAMS ON HAND AS TORNADOS SWEEP THROUGH GEORGIA, DOWNTOWN ATLANTA

When tornados swept through Georgia this past weekend, Amateur Radio
operators were on hand to assist where needed. On Friday, March 14, an
EF-2 tornado touched down in downtown Atlanta at 9:38 PM (local time).
The National Weather Service said the twister was 6 miles long and 200
yards wide. Downtown Atlanta was a busy place that evening; not only was
there a professional basketball game, college basketball fans were in
town for the Southeast Conference tournament at the Georgia Dome. Due to
the tornados, the final college game of the day was postponed until the
next day. According to reports, the tornado blew off portions of the
roof of the Georgia Dome.

An EF-2 tornado has wind speeds from 111-135 MPH. In such a tornado,
roofs are torn off well-constructed houses, foundations of frame homes
are shifted, mobile homes can be completely destroyed, large trees are
snapped or uprooted, light-object missiles are generated and cars can be
lifted off the ground.

ARRL Georgia Section Manager Susan Swiderski, AF4FO, said "William
Chandler, KG4JTK, went from house to house in the wind and the rain
checking for any injuries in the homes that had sustained damage by
falling trees and debris. At the same time, he issued reports via radio
to Barry Kanne, W4TGA, the Emergency Coordinator for neighboring DeKalb
County, regarding fallen trees, billboards, power lines and other
threats to public safety. Barry relayed this information to the Atlanta
911 center and to the Grady Hospital Emergency Operations Center."
DeKalb County is directly to the east of Fulton County; Atlanta is the
county seat of Fulton County.

The City of Atlanta Web site reported that "[e]xtensive damage has been
reported to a number of landmark buildings in downtown, including the
Omni Hotel, Georgia World Congress Center, CNN Building, the Georgia
Dome and Phillips Arena and homes and businesses in nearby
neighborhoods." The Red Cross opened a shelter at Central Recreation
Center. There was "no external damage" to Hartsfield International
Airport.

Eyewitness accounts said that "huge hunks of metal and broken glass were
everywhere [in Atlanta], as well as overturned cars and benches in the
road. Olympic Centennial Park is a mess." The high winds caused major
damage to several other landmarks including the Georgia World Congress
Center. Many hotels and office buildings had their windows blown out.
Grady Memorial Hospital, the major trauma center for the Atlanta metro
area, had its 100 foot tall communications tower blown off the hospital
roof, disabling communications with emergency medical personnel.

ARRL Georgia Section Traffic Manager Charles Pennington, K4GK, served as
Net Manager during the storms: "After several hours of recovery and
damage assessment, it became obvious that while Atlanta had received
major damage to downtown area, there were no fatalities reported and
amazingly only 21 persons were treated for injuries." Two fatalities
were reported in northwest Georgia.

In Effingham County, near Savannah on Georgia's coastline, Swiderski
said a tornado "took down six power towers during the annual St
Patrick's Day celebrations," thrusting the community into "total
blackout conditions."

"A local 2 meter SKYWARN net, with Greg Tillman, N4VAD, serving as NCS,
provided a vital link with the staff at Memorial University Medical
Center in Savannah. Dr Ra Meguiar, N4RVM, a physician and senior
hospital administrator, later sent a letter of appreciation in
recognition of the local hams 'for staying with us through the weather
and the power outage.' He said that this was his first experience in
participating in a severe weather net and the 'support was invaluable,'"
Swiderski said.

According to Swiderski, reports came mostly through the linked repeater
system, "usually from a liaison from one of the many local nets that
were going on in county after county, but there were also reports from
stand-alone hams who had the misfortune of being in an affected area.
There were reports of wall clouds, funnel clouds and hailstones -- large
hailstones, sometimes as large as baseballs."

Tillman said that two mobile homes were completely destroyed and one was
"tossed like a rag doll, rolling over numerous times 100 feet from its
foundation where the anchors were pulled up from the ground." Nearly a
dozen other homes and automobiles were damaged; five people from
Effingham were transported to the local hospital for treatment and
evaluation, he said.

"In some of the counties, this event was a true 'baptism under fire' for
brand new Emergency Coordinators," Swiderski said. "I'm pleased to say
that they all conducted themselves and all of the challenges admirably."

==> STATION LOCATOR SERVICE NEW FOR FIELD DAY 2008

This year, for the first time, the ARRL has put together a Station
Locator to help amateurs or those interested in Amateur Radio find a
Field Day site near them. According to ARRL Field Day Manager Dan
Henderson, N1ND, many amateurs have been asking for something like this
for many years.

If your group would like to be a part of the Station Locator Service,
it's easy to get started. Just go to the Field Day Station Locator Web
site <http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/fd/locator.php> (http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/fd/locator.php) and
follow the instructions.

To help you out, Henderson has prepared a FAQ for the Field Day Station
Locator.

Q) How does our Field Day site get listed on the map?
A) A club official or Field Day Chairman needs to go to the Web site.
Once there, click on the link for "Add a Station" and follow the
instructions.

Q) I put in the name of the park where we will be holding Field Day but
got the message that the program can't find it. What do I do?
A) You should use a street address for the location. Unfortunately, the
mapping program doesn't have a 100 percent complete database of park
names and public site names. You may use a latitude/longitude -- enter
the values separated by a comma (e.g. 42.345N, 85.445W) and set the city
to NONE).

Q) I put in a street address but the map locator put me it in a wrong
location on the street. What do I do?
A) While in the data input or edit screen, use your cursor to move the
red "pin" to the correct location on the map.

Q) What if I put in the wrong information or something about our Field
Day operation changes?
A) The person who input the data will be able to edit the entry. Simply
follow the "Add a Station" link and then select "Edit this entry" next
to the one to correct.

Q). I tried to enter my club's information, but I was denied access.
What do I do?
A) To help ensure that only one person is managing a club's entry, you
must be logged onto the site with your ARRL member ID and password. If
you are not an ARRL member, ask a member of the club who is to be
responsible for adding the club's information to the site.

Q) I am looking for a Field Day operation to attend. How do I use the
site?
A) Begin by typing in the city and state where you would like to search,
something like "Brooklyn, New York" or "Anaheim, California." Depending
on the geographic location, the map will take you to the area you list.
If a Field Day operation has been registered for that general area, a
red "pin" will show on the map. If you click on the red pin, the details
for that site will appear in the box on the right hand side of the
screen. If you don't see a red pin, scroll out a level to find one near
the location you listed. It is also possible to drag the map to other
areas by holding down the left button on your mouse and then moving the
map around. You can also scroll in and out using the ± buttons on the
left side of the map. You may also zoom in and center by double-clicking
with the mouse near the red pin.

Q) I found a red pin near where I will be. Where do I find the
information on that site?
A) Each entry has a contact person with either an e-mail address or
phone number who should be able to help you. It will appear on the right
side of the box when you click on the red pin for an entry.

Q) I found an entry with wrong information. What should I do?
A) Please contact the person whose name appears as the contact person
for that site. ARRL HQ does not have detailed information on the site.

Q) I want to check on our club's information. What should I do?
A) Type in the call sign that will be used and you will be taken to the
location and club information.

ARRL Field Day will be held June 28-29. For more information, please
visit the Field Day Web page <http://www.arrl.org/fieldday> (http://www.arrl.org/fieldday).

==> "THE DOCTOR IS IN" THE ARRL LETTER

This week, ARRL Letter readers are in luck! The ARRL's very own Doctor,
author of the popular QST column "The Doctor Is IN," answers a question
from his mailbag:

Question -- Jeff Otto, WA1QYW, of Framingham, Massachusetts, asks: I
have a new SSB transceiver, and I noticed something peculiar. When I
tune to an empty frequency, say on 20 meters, with absolutely no signals
and only noise, and I switch the mode between USB and LSB, the received
"tone" of the background noise changes. On one position, it sounds like
it consists of more high frequency components, and on the other position
it sounds like more low frequency components. I would have thought that
white noise would sound the same, regardless of which sideband is being
received. In normal SSB operation, this effect is not really noticed.
I'm wondering if there is some sort of a misalignment in the radio.

The Doctor Answers -- Jeff, I agree with your diagnosis. Switching
between USB and LSB switches the "BFO" or injected carrier frequency
from one side of the SSB filter bandwidth to the other. There are a few
exceptions, notably the early RL Drake tube transceivers that kept the
same BFO frequency but switched the filters. Switching the BFO frequency
is generally cheaper than having two filters.

There are two possibilities: One, that the shape of the filter passband
is not flat. If it's higher on one side than the other, that will
translate to stronger high frequency response on one sideband and
stronger low on the other.

The other, and I would say more likely, possibility is that the BFO
oscillators are not spaced the same distance from the edge of filter
bandwidth. In one case you might have (with a 2.1 kHz filter, for
example) with 200 Hz offset, an audio response from 200 to 2300 Hz,
while the other sideband if spaced 400 Hz will have a response from 400
Hz to 2500 Hz. The usual design response is from 300 Hz to 300 + the
filter bandwidth.

You can test this by using a good low-level audio generator in the
microphone input (set to the same level as the mic audio), and checking
the response at the audio monitor jack, if your radio has one. You could
also check with another receiver, but unless it is very wideband, you
would really be measuring the combination of offsets and filters in both
radios.

If your transceiver has a PASSBAND TUNING or IF SHIFT control, you can
move it to make the receive audio sound the same on either sideband, but
that won't help on the transmit side. If it's not very different, and if
you get good audio reports on both sidebands, you could also just
pretend you hadn't noticed!

==> ARRL MEMBERSHIP NEWSLETTERS, BULLETINS AND NOTIFICATIONS

Did you know the ARRL offers more newsletters than just The ARRL Letter?
One of the many ARRL membership benefits includes other newsletters,
such as the ARRL Contest Rate Sheet (a bi-weekly contest newsletter),
the ARES E-Letter (sent monthly, containing public service and emergency
communications news), the ARRL Club News, the ARRL Instructor/Teacher
E-Letter and the IARU E-Letter.

You can also elect to receive news and information from your Division
Director and Section Manager (keep in mind that not all
Divisions/Sections send notices), as well as W1AW bulletins that relate
to DX, propagation, satellites and Keplerian reports. The ARRL also
offers a free notification service to members, letting them know when
their membership and license are due to expire.

Sign up for these newsletters, bulletins and notifications on the Member
Data page of the ARRL Web site
<http://www.arrl.org/members-only/memdata.html> (http://www.arrl.org/members-only/memdata.html).

==> NATIONAL HURRICANE CONFERENCE SET FOR APRIL

The 30th Annual National Hurricane Conference
<http://www.hurricanemeeting.com> (http://www.hurricanemeeting.com/) begins on March 31, running through
April 4 at the Rosen Centre Hotel in Orlando, Florida. This annual event
brings together many disciplines in the Emergency Management field to
address tropical events that impact the United States.

Once again, Amateur Radio is being highlighted on Tuesday, April 1 in a
4.5 hour training session. ARRL Emergency Preparedness and Response
Manager Dennis Dura, K2DCD, is the Chairman of the Amateur Radio
Committee of the NHC, and has put together what he calls "a worthwhile
learning experience for the attendees."

Leading off the afternoon will be a presentation on Amateur Radio and
the National Hurricane Center (NHC) Station WX4NHC
<http://www.fiu.edu/orgs/w4ehw> (http://www.fiu.edu/orgs/w4ehw) by John McHugh, K4AG, and Julio Ripoll,
WD4R, the Amateur Radio Coordinators at the NHC
<http://www.nhc.noaa.gov> (http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/). The VoIP Hurricane Net
<http://www.voipwx.net> (http://www.voipwx.net/) will then be highlighted in a presentation by
Rob Macedo, KD1CY, Director of Operations.

The final formal presentation of the afternoon will be the subject of
Macedo's and Dura's "Emergency Management's use of Amateur Radio for
Situational Awareness and Disaster Intelligence." This discussion is
focused on the Emergency Managers and their staff to give them clear
concepts to include Amateur Radio in their operational plans beyond the
more traditional uses of emergency traffic handling. As time permits,
the afternoon will conclude with an open forum on current issues in
Amateur Radio's response to tropical events.

==> EMCOMMWEST COMING TO RENO IN MAY

EMCOMMWEST 2008 -- an ARRL specialty convention devoted entirely to
emergency communications -- is coming to the Circus Circus Hotel Resort
in Reno, Nevada May 2-4.

ARRL Emergency Preparedness and Response Manager Dennis Dura, K2DCD,
will host an Emergency Communications forum and deliver the keynote
address. Gordon West, WB6NOA, will be the special guest for the Saturday
night banquet; West will also bring his mobile communication unit and
present an "Introduction to Emergency Communications" forum on Saturday.
Special Counsel of the FCC's Enforcement Bureau Riley Hollingsworth had
been scheduled to make an in-person appearance, but instead will attend
EMCOMMWEST via a special video presentation.

The Reno Spring Hamswap will be held on Saturday, May 3 starting at 6
AM, adjacent to the hotel (corner of Sixth and Sierra). Everyone is
invited to swap and sell. Unlike last year, there are no charges for
buyers or sellers. Bring your own tables or swap out of the back of your
vehicle.

There are four tracks of programs currently scheduled for EMCOMMWEST:
General/Technical EmComm (covering public relations, hazmat awareness,
recruiting EmComm teams and more), EmComm 101 (including an introduction
to Emergency Communications, Net Control Station training, message
handling training, EmComm go-kits and a message handling competition),
EmComm Served Agencies (including a weather spotter class, emergency
operation centers, search and rescue, Salvation Army, MARS and CERT),
and Education and Recruiting (including a Technician "Ham Cram" and VE
sessions). The Ham Cram is for anyone interested in obtaining their
Technician class license without suffering through a classroom
environment.

There will be a special event station, N7Z, on HF, UHF and VHF. A
special QSL card will be available.

Registration is now available online via the EMCOMMWEST Website
<http://www.emcommwest.org> (http://www.emcommwest.org/). Special room rates are available from
Circus Circus <http://www.circuscircusreno.com/> (http://www.circuscircusreno.com/). Please visit the
EMCOMMWEST Web site or e-mail <info@emcommwest.org> (info@emcommwest.org) for more information

==> EMMETT FREITAS, AE6Z (SK)

Emmett Freitas, AE6Z (ex-W6OIA), known as "Shorty" to his friends,
passed away February 23. An ARRL Life Member, Freitas was on the
Volunteer Examiner team that administered the first Amateur Radio
license test session on August 31, 1984. He went on to participate in a
total of 548 test sessions. Freitas, a US Navy veteran in WWII, served
as a Chief Petty Officer (Radioman) on the USS Parakeet, as well as
other duties in and around the Panama Canal Zone, the Galapagos Islands,
Ecuador and Lakehurst, New Jersey. A memorial service was held in his
home city of San Jose, California on March 7.

==>SOLAR UPDATE

Tad "But by the Sun-spark on the sea" Cook, K7RA, this week reports:
ARRL Headquarters is closed for Good Friday on March 21, so this
bulletin is coming out a day early, and on the vernal equinox. We had a
few more days with visible sunspots over the past week. Sunspot numbers
on March 15-17 were 12, 12 and 11. Over the past month, we seem to have
a single sunspot appear for a few days, then fade away or rotate out of
view, then another pop up after four or five days. Projection for the
near term is planetary A index of 5 for March 20-24, then 10, 20, 25, 20
and 8 for March 25-29. There are similar returns to planetary A index of
25 predicted for April 5, April 23 and May 2, but otherwise quiet.
Geophysical Institute Prague predicts quiet to unsettled conditions for
March 21, quiet March 22-24, unsettled March 25 and active March 26-27.
For more information concerning radio propagation, visit the ARRL
Technical Information Service Propagation page
<http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/propagation.html> (http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/propagation.html). To read this week's
Solar Report in its entirety, check out the W1AW Propagation Bulletin
page <http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/prop/> (http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/prop/).

__________________________________

==>IN BRIEF:

* This Weekend on the Radio: This weekend, look for the ARLHS Annual
Spring Lites QSO Party from March 21-30. The NCCC Sprint is March 21.
The BARTG Spring RTTY Contest is March 22-24. The UBA Spring Contest (2
Meters) is March 23 and the SKCC Sprint is March 26. Next weekend is
another running of the NCCC Sprint on March 28. The CQ WW WPX Contest
(SSB) is March 29-30. See the ARRL Contest Branch page
<http://www.arrl.org/contests/> (http://www.arrl.org/contests/), the ARRL Contester's Rate Sheet
<http://www.arrl.org/contests/rate-sheet/> (http://www.arrl.org/contests/rate-sheet/) and the WA7BNM Contest
Calendar <http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/index.html> (http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/index.html) for more
info.

* ARRL Continuing Education Course Registration: Registration remains
open through Sunday, March 23, 2008, for these online course sessions
beginning on Friday, April 4, 2008: Technician License Course (EC-010);
Amateur Radio Emergency Communications Level 1 (EC-001); Radio Frequency
Interference (EC-006); Antenna Design and Construction (EC-009); Analog
Electronics (EC-012), and Digital Electronics (EC-013). Each online
course has been developed in segments -- learning units with objectives,
informative text, student activities and quizzes. Courses are
interactive, and some include direct communications with a
Mentor/Instructor. Students register for a particular session that may
be 8, 12 or 16 weeks (depending on the course) and they may access the
course at any time of day during the course period, completing lessons
and activities at times convenient for their personal schedule. Mentors
assist students by answering questions, reviewing assignments and
activities, as well as providing helpful feedback. Interaction with
mentors is conducted through e-mail; there is no appointed time the
student must be present -- allowing complete flexibility for the student
to work when and where it is convenient. To learn more, visit the CCE
Course Listing page <http://www.arrl.org/cce/courses.html> (http://www.arrl.org/cce/courses.html) or contact
the Continuing Education Program Coordinator <cce@arrl.org> (cce@arrl.org).

================================================== =========
The ARRL Letter is published Fridays, 50 times each year, by the
American Radio Relay League: ARRL--the National Association for Amateur
Radio, 225 Main St, Newington, CT 06111; tel 860-594-0200; fax
860-594-0259; <http://www.arrl.org> (http://www.arrl.org/). Joel Harrison, W5ZN, President.

The ARRL Letter offers a weekly e-mail digest of essential and general
news of interest to active radio amateurs. Visit the ARRL Web site
<http://www.arrl.org> (http://www.arrl.org/) for the latest Amateur Radio news and news
updates. The ARRL Web site <http://www.arrl.org/> (http://www.arrl.org/) also offers
informative features and columns. ARRL Audio News
<http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/audio/> (http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/audio/) is a weekly "ham radio newscast"
compiled and edited from The ARRL Letter. It's also available as a
podcast from our Web site.

Material from The ARRL Letter may be republished or reproduced in whole
or in part in any form without additional permission. Credit must be
given to The ARRL Letter/American Radio Relay League.

==>Delivery problems (ARRL member direct delivery only!):
letter-dlvy@arrl.org
==>Editorial questions or comments: S. Khrystyne Keane, K1SFA,
k1sfa@arrl.org
==>ARRL News on the Web: <http://www.arrl.org> (http://www.arrl.org/)
==>ARRL Audio News: <http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/audio/> (http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/audio/) or call
860-594-0384

==>How to Get The ARRL Letter

The ARRL Letter is available to ARRL members free of charge directly
from ARRL HQ. To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your address for
e-mail delivery:
ARRL members first must register on the Members Only Web Site
<http://www.arrl.org/members/> (http://www.arrl.org/members/). You'll have an opportunity during
registration to sign up for e-mail delivery of The ARRL Letter, W1AW
bulletins, and other material. To change these selections--including
delivery of The ARRL Letter--registered members should click on the
"Member Data Page" link (in the Members Only box). Click on "Modify
membership data," check or uncheck the appropriate boxes and/or change
your e-mail address if necessary. (Check "Temporarily disable all
automatically sent email" to temporarily stop all e-mail deliveries.)
Then, click on "Submit modification" to make selections effective.
(NOTE: HQ staff members cannot change your e-mail delivery address. You
must do this yourself via the Members Only Web Site.)

The ARRL Letter also is available to all, free of charge, from these
sources:

* ARRLWeb <http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/> (http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/). (NOTE: The ARRL Letter will
be posted each Friday when it is distributed via e-mail.)

* The QTH.net listserver, thanks to volunteers from the Boston Amateur
Radio Club: Visit Mailing Lists@QTH.Net
<http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/letter-list> (http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/letter-list). (NOTE: The ARRL
cannot assist subscribers who receive The ARRL Letter via this
listserver.)

Copyright 2008 American Radio Relay League, Inc.
All Rights Reserved

n7wr
03-21-2008, 12:26 AM
I am just so pleased (not!) to read that Emcomm West--which has strayed far, far from the direction it took when it was created NOT BY THE ARRL but by K6SOJ--is going to feature a "ham cram"...for "those who do not wish to suffer through a classroom presentation". Just what we need. Just another means of capturing more potential ARRL members by teaching to the test (what the hell else can you do in a cram course) and, thus, creating another group of so-called hams who know nothing and contribute little if anything positive to this once great, but no longer, hobby. Thanks a bunch ARRL.

K0HWY
03-21-2008, 07:18 AM
"The Ham Cram is for anyone interested in obtaining their
Technician class license without suffering through a classroom
environment."

Suffering through a classroom environment? This statement is truly a sign of the coming of age of modern amateur radio. God, how can we ever possibly repay the hams who came before who had to endure the suffering, hardships and anguish of actually having to sit in a classroom and learn?

n9egm
03-21-2008, 01:47 PM
I am just so pleased (not!) to read that Emcomm West--which has strayed far, far from the direction it took when it was created NOT BY THE ARRL but by K6SOJ--is going to feature a "ham cram"...for "those who do not wish to suffer through a classroom presentation". Just what we need. Just another means of capturing more potential ARRL members by teaching to the test (what the hell else can you do in a cram course) and, thus, creating another group of so-called hams who know nothing and contribute little if anything positive to this once great, but no longer, hobby. Thanks a bunch ARRL.


Another reason that I've not renewed my ARRL membership. That will not help anything except tp get more people that don't care about the hobby, but just want to talk. ( 10 4 good buddy ):mad: Bring back CW requirement:D

KE4IKY
03-21-2008, 04:16 PM
The more rigorous the information that you want to teach is analyzed, the more what of what you teach and what you test turns out to be the same thing.

What is being suggested, that what is taught isn't tested? or maybe we should test on things that we didn't teach?

Ham radio, at the level of just getting a license, isn't rocket science.

It opens a door to a lot of things, to further exploration in radio sciences,
or contesting, or enabling hikers to keep in contact. Some people just want to use it to help with emergency communications, thats it.

I don't see why everyone is getting all grumpy about it.

NI7I
03-21-2008, 05:45 PM
I am just so pleased (not!) to read that Emcomm West--which has strayed far, far from the direction it took when it was created NOT BY THE ARRL but by K6SOJ--is going to feature a "ham cram"...for "those who do not wish to suffer through a classroom presentation". Just what we need. Just another means of capturing more potential ARRL members by teaching to the test (what the hell else can you do in a cram course) and, thus, creating another group of so-called hams who know nothing and contribute little if anything positive to this once great, but no longer, hobby. Thanks a bunch ARRL.
Very well spoken. Thank you.

Very Best Regards
Lee
NI7I

ab0wr
03-21-2008, 10:57 PM
I agree with the sentiments of those who see "cramming to the test" as a perversion. I am quite sure that no "material" will be taught, only questions and answers.

To those who think getting a ham license just to do emcomm is a good thing I refer to a quote from the ARRL bulletin: "went from house to house in the wind and the rain checking for any injuries in the homes that had sustained damage by falling trees and debris. At the same time, he issued reports via radio to Barry Kanne, W4TGA, the Emergency Coordinator for neighboring DeKalb County, regarding fallen trees, billboards, power lines and other threats to public safety. Barry relayed this information to the Atlanta 911 center and to the Grady Hospital Emergency Operations Center."

As one who has seen a tin shed flying through his backyard in the high winds and rain after a tornado had passed I am glad I was not outside to get hit by it. Running around in high winds and heavy rain is *NOT* being a first responder -- it is tempting fate! The EC and the EOC should have told him to *stay inside under shelter* until the winds and rain (and probably hail) had subsided and the storm front had moved through.

That the ARRL would be publicizing such action as something to be *praised* in an ARRL bulletin is just one more reason I am no longer an ARRL member. They have turned to glorifying whackers as something to emulate -- and sooner or later someone that they have recruited under that banner will die or be injured severely.

tim ab0wr

KA5LQJ
03-23-2008, 07:35 PM
Whoa!

A Cram course? What ever happened to learning Basic Electronics? I got interested in radio/electronics at age 12 in 1958. There were no shortcuts, period! I had to learn Ohm's Law, radio terminology, schematic symbols, how to measure voltage, current, resistance, know the resistor color code and long before I ever learned Morse.

This was the information I was eager to learn and not memorize the answers. I experimented, I repaired, I built things with wooden boards & aluminum chassis, tube sockets, ceramic stand-offs and wired the circuits together with resistors, condensers, wire, coils and learned to properly solder a joint and STILL, I wasn't a Ham, but an electronics student.

Should someone take the Cram course, there are a lot of things they will miss out on in learning. No, I wouldn't expect them to actually FIX one of these rice rigs. But they would have a better understandiing on HOW things work.

Unfortunately, because of my present medical condition, I've forgotten some of the most common things I knew from having actually done it. But, fortunately, I have some wonderful ham friends locally and on QRZ that help me when I ask. :D

If you only want to do E-Comms then join the Red Cross or get a CB rig. If you want a real HOBBY with millions of facets to get involved in, then by all means, LEARN Basic Electronics, understand what you read, then choose a facet of ham radio, but always keeping your mind open to other facets you just might enjoy later.

As for myself? I'm re-leaning the Morse code after 25 years of "mic-time", LOL!

Respectfully submitted,
73,

Don/KA5-LQJ

nc5s
03-23-2008, 08:49 PM
I am just so pleased (not!) to read that Emcomm West--which has strayed far, far from the direction it took when it was created NOT BY THE ARRL but by K6SOJ--is going to feature a "ham cram"...for "those who do not wish to suffer through a classroom presentation". Just what we need. Just another means of capturing more potential ARRL members by teaching to the test (what the hell else can you do in a cram course) and, thus, creating another group of so-called hams who know nothing and contribute little if anything positive to this once great, but no longer, hobby. Thanks a bunch ARRL.

This is exactly why we have Amateur Extra Class "Operators" who do no know, or understand, the formula for a simple dipole antenna.

73,

Ed

w6em
03-24-2008, 01:14 AM
First, I'm not about to defend the apparent pleasure that ARRL takes in augmenting to licensees by virtue of a "cram memorization course."

Way back when, in the 'early '60s, I remember a 10 year old who didn't know the background, but got his license......somehow. So, its been going on for a long time....

Oh, he learned to copy CW, but the meat of the questions, he didn't. Just memorized the ARRL License Manual questions and answers. He's still licensed today. And, he went on to get a First Phone as well, although as a teenager. Perhaps he got motivated enough to learn some theory along the way......or went to one of those radio disc jockey cram schools in LA. And, no, he didn't do as Don did. He strictly operated....period.

OK. So, as Tim says, "somebody may harm themselves" out of ignorance. Well, there have been plenty who "knew better" and took short cuts, only to suffer the consequences. So, knowledge isn't bliss (even if ignorance really isn't).

Alright, let's take the low road. Somebody memorizes the Q&A pool, gets a license, buys a rig. And, connects it to a piece of wire along the fence (if a General or Extra). Only a few contacts. Lousy signal reports. The rig just won't put out much power. Hmmmm. Hasn't a clue. Well, folks, its like what the "big-gun" DXers want: continued CC&Rs to limit the effective competition through horribly inefficient antennas. Yes, the effective competition.

A modern HF radio with SWR sensing circuitry will only allow a few Watts out with a terrible mismatch. Oh, then, when a few of them buy tuners and hook them up, they'll get RF burns from anything and everything they touch. And, the phone, stereo and TV will all become RF modulation monitors......

And, after several of the above experiences, just how long will they "enjoy" the experience? Probably not long. Frustration out of not knowing how to find and fix the problems will be self-fulfilling.......

Those who take the time to learn, to invest in the knowledge, will find satisfaction in the outcome.


73.

kc7gnm
03-24-2008, 01:56 AM
I agree with the sentiments of those who see "cramming to the test" as a perversion. I am quite sure that no "material" will be taught, only questions and answers.

To those who think getting a ham license just to do emcomm is a good thing I refer to a quote from the ARRL bulletin: "went from house to house in the wind and the rain checking for any injuries in the homes that had sustained damage by falling trees and debris. At the same time, he issued reports via radio to Barry Kanne, W4TGA, the Emergency Coordinator for neighboring DeKalb County, regarding fallen trees, billboards, power lines and other threats to public safety. Barry relayed this information to the Atlanta 911 center and to the Grady Hospital Emergency Operations Center."

As one who has seen a tin shed flying through his backyard in the high winds and rain after a tornado had passed I am glad I was not outside to get hit by it. Running around in high winds and heavy rain is *NOT* being a first responder -- it is tempting fate! The EC and the EOC should have told him to *stay inside under shelter* until the winds and rain (and probably hail) had subsided and the storm front had moved through.

That the ARRL would be publicizing such action as something to be *praised* in an ARRL bulletin is just one more reason I am no longer an ARRL member. They have turned to glorifying whackers as something to emulate -- and sooner or later someone that they have recruited under that banner will die or be injured severely.

tim ab0wr

In 8 more days I will no longer be a member of that stupid society. My membership expires officially at the end of this month and I will be happy to let them go. First with their endorsement of winlink now this cram session crap they are no longer a premier organization. They are just a bunch of folks wanting numbers not quality.

k1rfd
03-24-2008, 02:37 AM
No, I wouldn't expect them to actually FIX one of these rice rigs.

Should we begin calling American-made equipment "pizza boxes"?

And is American-made surface-mount equipment any easier to fix than surface-mount equipment made in any other country?

Or do you actually have equipment that contains grains of rice? If so, you might have more success working on it by removing the cover, turning it upside down, and shaking out the grains of rice. ;)

WA5BEN
03-24-2008, 04:09 AM
I agree with the sentiments of those who see "cramming to the test" as a perversion. I am quite sure that no "material" will be taught, only questions and answers.

To those who think getting a ham license just to do emcomm is a good thing I refer to a quote from the ARRL bulletin: "went from house to house in the wind and the rain checking for any injuries in the homes that had sustained damage by falling trees and debris. At the same time, he issued reports via radio to Barry Kanne, W4TGA, the Emergency Coordinator for neighboring DeKalb County, regarding fallen trees, billboards, power lines and other threats to public safety. Barry relayed this information to the Atlanta 911 center and to the Grady Hospital Emergency Operations Center."

As one who has seen a tin shed flying through his backyard in the high winds and rain after a tornado had passed I am glad I was not outside to get hit by it. Running around in high winds and heavy rain is *NOT* being a first responder -- it is tempting fate! The EC and the EOC should have told him to *stay inside under shelter* until the winds and rain (and probably hail) had subsided and the storm front had moved through.

That the ARRL would be publicizing such action as something to be *praised* in an ARRL bulletin is just one more reason I am no longer an ARRL member. They have turned to glorifying whackers as something to emulate -- and sooner or later someone that they have recruited under that banner will die or be injured severely.

tim ab0wr

People have crammed for license exams ever since a standard test was created, including when we had tests administered by the FCC -- both amateur and commercial. The FCC finally did away with the First Class Radiotelephone license because of the large number of DJ's who literally could not find the master switch, but who fully satisfied the FCC license requirement that there must be a First Class license holder at the station when it was transmitting.

The interesting thing is that many of those "license mill" license holders actually became interested in the technical side, and some became very knowledgeable engineers. Quite a few ended up getting their ham tickets.

I was not thrilled when the FCC chose not to renew all First Class (and Second Class) Radiotelephone Licenses, and "replaced" them with a Lifetime General Radiotelephone License. The fact remains,however, that the licenses had become useless for the original intent and purpose -- ensuring technical competence. (Interestingly, the test for amateur Advanced Class was more rigorous than the test for the First Class Radiotelephone License.)

The simple fact is that ham radio is a hobby that is quite diverse in both theory and practice. It exposes people to a wide range of possible interests, and offers them unique capabilities.

Some people choose to become electronic engineers. Some of those choose to design circuits, others to design antennas, others to design systems, others to write code, others to manage projects, others to perform pure research, others to do technical sales, and others to teach. One does not have to do everything to be a good engineer.

Similarly, one does not have to do everything in ham radio to be a good ham. The ham who only wishes to do CW on a straight key may be a good ham, as may the person who only wishes to use his/her equipment to support his/her community. Conversely, each may be a disgrace to the hobby.

I know many "CW only" operators with Advanced Class and Extra Class licenses who have been licensed for 30+ years who are not competent to troubleshoot a simple transmitter. I also know some no-code techs who can give just about anyone a run for the money when it comes to electronic knowledge and troubleshooting ability.

The person got off of his duff and went about doing EXACTLY what his city and county needed him to do -- tell them where damage existed, what types of resources were needed, where, when, and how many. The story did NOT say that he went out during the severe storm. It said that he went out AFTER the damage had been done. High -- but not dangerous -- winds are fairly common in the aftermath of a tornado.

If one understands how tornadoes form, and their life cycle, one can easily judge when it is safe to begin damage assessment and survivor search. The basic training presented by NWS provides that understanding. The NWS advanced training goes far deeper.

It is incredible that those who bring CREDIT to the hobby are condemned by those who have apparently done nothing for the hobby -- and who apparently lack even basic understanding of disaster response. A serious and widespread disaster was first warned of, then responded to by TRAINED operators, working as a part of the team of first responders.

WA5BEN
03-24-2008, 05:02 AM
Whoa!

A Cram course? What ever happened to learning Basic Electronics? I got interested in radio/electronics at age 12 in 1958. There were no shortcuts, period! I had to learn Ohm's Law, radio terminology, schematic symbols, how to measure voltage, current, resistance, know the resistor color code and long before I ever learned Morse.

This was the information I was eager to learn and not memorize the answers. I experimented, I repaired, I built things with wooden boards & aluminum chassis, tube sockets, ceramic stand-offs and wired the circuits together with resistors, condensers, wire, coils and learned to properly solder a joint and STILL, I wasn't a Ham, but an electronics student.

Should someone take the Cram course, there are a lot of things they will miss out on in learning. No, I wouldn't expect them to actually FIX one of these rice rigs. But they would have a better understandiing on HOW things work.

Unfortunately, because of my present medical condition, I've forgotten some of the most common things I knew from having actually done it. But, fortunately, I have some wonderful ham friends locally and on QRZ that help me when I ask. :D

If you only want to do E-Comms then join the Red Cross or get a CB rig. If you want a real HOBBY with millions of facets to get involved in, then by all means, LEARN Basic Electronics, understand what you read, then choose a facet of ham radio, but always keeping your mind open to other facets you just might enjoy later.

As for myself? I'm re-leaning the Morse code after 25 years of "mic-time", LOL!

Respectfully submitted,
73,

Don/KA5-LQJ

Why do you assume that those who do public service and EMCOMM are NOT knowledgeable in electronics ? Quite a few if us are either engineers or high-level electronic technicians, and quite a lot of those who are not are professionals in other fields. The overall level of technical expertise of those involved in EMCOMM actually ranks well ahead of the general amateur population, because of required training, drills, and public service events that provide true "hands on" training.

The Red Cross does NOT now do, and never has done, EMCOMM. The Red Cross is a well after the disaster event "eventual" responder. Their exceedingly limited communications resources are used exclusively for Red Cross politics and logistics. From my experiences, their field communications people are not trained in any manner. (I have had to show them how to a) use their SATCOM, b) put up their antenna, and c) get on the right frequency.)

If one understands actual requirements for EMCOMM, one understands how utterly useless both Red Cross radios and CB radios actually are. In EMCOMM, one needs to be able to completely cover the both the area(s) of the disaster and the major "control points" involved in getting resources into the disaster area(s). After Katrina, that area was about 200 miles by 100 miles, with no electricity, no phone service, and no state police communications in much of it.

Amateur HF radio was the first link established, followed by amateur VHF as some key repeaters survived and others were brought back on line. The primary communications links for Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama cities, counties and parishes to the state EOC were on amateur radio for several days. Troops / communications gear did not arrive in Bogalusa, LA until about 9 days after the hurricane. LA state police communications were still down in the "boot" of LA for more than 10 days after the hurricane.

Amateur radio supported city to parish, parish to parish, and parish to state EOC communications. Amateur radio was the ONLY available communications.

w6em
03-24-2008, 12:59 PM
Should we begin calling American-made equipment "pizza boxes"?

And, I thought all along that pizza was invented in Italy. "Burger boxes" would be a better monacher.

And is American-made surface-mount equipment any easier to fix than surface-mount equipment made in any other country?



Now, with that one, I've got to laugh.... I hate SMT. Anyone who's been challenged to repair same, even with an expensive hot air gun and complete set of nozzles will even tell you so. Or, even tried to measure a voltage with a "fat" probe from their multimeter on a component.

American made SMT amateur gear? OK, that would have to be either Ten Tec or Elecraft's K3. And, I would not want to testify that both of those make their own boards and populate them here. Perhaps final assembly, but I'd bet the boards are populated offshore.

Now, that brings me to documentation. All of it from the "offshore" manufacturers is a bit lacking. Oh, yes, even what I've seen of the service manuals. While I'm often a critic of Motorola, I will forever praise their ability to generate superb maintenance manuals, including SMT-laden modern equipment. And, sadly, all of their gear that I've seen as of late is from offshore as well.

w6em
03-24-2008, 01:47 PM
....... The overall level of technical expertise of those involved in EMCOMM actually ranks well ahead of the general amateur population, because of required training, drills, and public service events that provide true "hands on" training.

And, Larry, where is the data to back up that claim? I've read of entire fire departments that have strongly urged their members to get tickets to use amateur radio as a means of communications. I'd bet they encouraged cramming.

While drills and public service events require some training, its likely more like "which channels or PLs to use," or "who is going to man which checkpoint" and not about radio theory or how to tune or match antennas.

ARRL would love to receive more government DHS grant money. Make EMCOMM ARRL course work mandatory for licensure. Now, THAT would make the income line on their balance sheet swell....... Just a few more articles and pushing the FCC folks at VEC meetings ought to do it......

............


Amateur HF radio was the first link established, followed by amateur VHF as some key repeaters survived and others were brought back on line. The primary communications links for Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama cities, counties and parishes to the state EOC were on amateur radio for several days. Troops / communications gear did not arrive in Bogalusa, LA until about 9 days after the hurricane. LA state police communications were still down in the "boot" of LA for more than 10 days after the hurricane.

Amateur radio supported city to parish, parish to parish, and parish to state EOC communications. Amateur radio was the ONLY available communications.

Unfortunately, Larry, even though most of the Achilles' Heel was trunked gear or IP-related interconnection, that fact was *buried* (as you well know) or not reported at all in the FCC's Katrina Report. Why not? Because the FCC is heavily committed to forcing public safety entities off of their conventional VHF and UHF systems onto 700MHz trunked junk. Complete with "freebie" DHS grant money to do so.

For all of the above, we can all thank Motorola. Their group vice president was a member of the Katrina Committee, yet it wasn't their trunking gear that failed. It was a competitor's. The competitor wasn't a member of the panel, as they should have been. Even without the competitor's membership, Motorola should have been grilled for answers as to *why* trunking systems (both theirs and others) were/are vulnerable to single point failures. Notably absent from the panel membership were radio communications participants: the ARRL; the Red Cross; the Salvation Army; Southern Baptist Relief; and the military. Why? I needn't dwell on it. Obviously, the interests in the outcome of the committee's report were prefocused.

The interoperability problem wasn't solved and won't be through use of 700MHz trunked junk. For those that don't know, it takes lots of "cell-phone-like" zones to make a trunked system work, and those would have to be wheeled or dropped into a disaster zone and set up in order for trunked mobiles arriving from hither and yon to intercommunicate. Or, if the area was home to a trunked system, as in New Orleans and the Louisiana HP, its controller and all cells would have to be repaired first. Otherwise, trunked mobiles, operating in conventional simplex mode, won't be able to talk more than a mile or two. And, no, it isn't in the works to have 700MHz trunked radios added to every military and Coast Guard helicopter either.....

The simple approach of dedicating a half dozen frequencies for interoperability between amateur radio, the National Guard, the military, Coast Guard and public safety has so far been nixed by the FCC. The agencies already have VHF highband FM radios in place. And, to those who say that national interoperability frequencies already exist at highband VHF, those channels are licensed and used routinely by agencies and not available for drills, training exercises and such. The key to being ready and able to function post disaster is to be equipped and ready. 700MHz trunked junk won't properly address a post Katrina-scale event.

The Harris Corporation recently introduced some keyboard-programmable VHF radios for interoperability applications. Thus far, only federal agencies can use them, since Part 90 licensees aren't permitted to. Perhaps, someday soon, that will change.

73.

K2PG
03-24-2008, 06:22 PM
Ham Cram? There's already an emcomm-oriented organization out there for people who "don't want to suffer through a classroom environment" for obtaining an amateur radio license. It's called "REACT" and no amateur license is required! What's next...selling QST at truck stops? Of course, such efforts help the companies who advertise in QST to sell more of those plastic ricebox radios with the gaudy front panel displays! (What, no "roger beep" or "echo box"?)

A sign of these sorry, sorry times is when I called a major amateur radio retailer, asking for price and availability of porcelain insulators for wire antennas. He told me that he does not carry the insulators, only prefabricated dipoles and G5RV antennas. If you can't even figure out how to make a dipole antenna, it's time to send back your license and get back on 11 meters. But this is the Brave New World of amateur radio according to today's ARRL! Of course, QST itself is devoid of any meaningful technical content, substituting nauseating human interest articles that read like the Reader's Digest, only with a radio geek flavor. The remaining two thirds of the magazine are devoted to ads for...you guessed it...riceboxes!

Thanks to the cheapening of the amateur radio entry requirements, the European CEPT no longer recognizes the U.S. General Class license. And "emcomm" itself is often a joke, where yahoos put blue or amber light bars on their SUVs or pickup trucks, then get in the way of the real emergency service personnel while playing wannabe cop or fireman. We had a real winner in New Jersey a few years ago. This character, a freshly minted no-code Tech, thought that his ARES card gave him the right to transmit on his local police department's frequency! The cops found him, made the arrest, and confiscated his radios and computer. The newspapers had a real "Field Day" with that story, including the Asbury Park Press, New Jersey's second largest newspaper. Is this the image of amateur radio that we want the public to see?

At one time, it was a federal offense to divulge the contents of any FCC licensing exams. Nowadays, the question pools are published verbatim by the VECs. And the CBification of amateur radio is the ugly result. But the clique in Newington can sell plenty of license manuals!

Perhaps the ARRL should explore a merger with REACT and just get into CB, FRS, MURS, and GMRS. Then they can leave us the hell alone!

w6em
03-24-2008, 07:46 PM
.......A sign of these sorry, sorry times is when I called a major amateur radio retailer, asking for price and availability of porcelain insulators for wire antennas. He told me that he does not carry the insulators, only prefabricated dipoles and G5RV antennas.

Hi, Phil. Its about that bad at hamfests. Although, I prefer to "roll my own" insulators. I start with 1/2" fiberglass solid rod (sold in 8 foot sections by Max Gain Systems www.mgs4u.com) and then cut it in 8 to 9 inch pieces with my Dremel, drill through on each end about an inch in. I then cut some horizontal groves to the ends from the holes, and chamfer the ends on my grinder. And, I finish them off with a coat of Krylon gloss Hunter Green paint.

The result are "stealthy" looking end insulators that won't flashover, won't melt, won't get dirty and most importantly, won't shatter if you happen to drop the antenna. And, the wire will fail in tension long before the fiberglass insulators do.....


Perhaps the ARRL should explore a merger with REACT and just get into CB, FRS, MURS, and GMRS. Then they can leave us the hell alone!

Ha. That is a great suggestion. That way, both could focus on their favorite haunt (chasing ambulances for money). Let me see if my memory serves me correctlly: In the beginning, REACT stood for "Radio Emergency Action Citizens Team." And we all know what the Citizens stood for.......

As of late, I've found the anthology of Ham Radio magazine collection, marketed by CQ magazine, to be fulfilling. Great articles from a great era. And, for what its worth, CQ's article content is much more technical, as it should be.

Perhaps RSGB should invite US hams to join up. Their publication content is still primarily technical, as it should be.

w6em
03-24-2008, 07:57 PM
People have crammed for license exams ever since a standard test was created, including when we had tests administered by the FCC -- both amateur and commercial. The FCC finally did away with the First Class Radiotelephone license because of the large number of DJ's who literally could not find the master switch, but who fully satisfied the FCC license requirement that there must be a First Class license holder at the station when it was transmitting. ........


While what you said of the "DJ Mill" cram graduate ability was true, the reason for the elimination of the First Class and follow-on General Radiotelephone Operator license requirement to operate directional AM and TV stations was because the National Association of Broadcasters had asked the FCC to be released from that requirement. The reason? Well, I was told by someone who is employed in a high position with a multi-station corporation, it was done so that anyone could be hired, with or without license, to maintain and operate said stations.

Just like the present Administration's penchant to send US jobs overseas, removal of a licensing barrier increases the available labor pool, and hence, reduces its cost. That was the reason, Larry. I used to be one of those "exceptions" to the rule, and did the maintaining and operating. And, yes, when a DJ got sick, I used to do that too....... Now, my GROL just sits in a desk drawer, collecting dust. I got my First the "old fashioned" way. I learned the stuff as a high schooler.

ab0wr
03-25-2008, 02:59 AM
wa5ben:The person got off of his duff and went about doing EXACTLY what his city and county needed him to do -- tell them where damage existed, what types of resources were needed, where, when, and how many. The story did NOT say that he went out during the severe storm. It said that he went out AFTER the damage had been done. High -- but not dangerous -- winds are fairly common in the aftermath of a tornado.

If one understands how tornadoes form, and their life cycle, one can easily judge when it is safe to begin damage assessment and survivor search. The basic training presented by NWS provides that understanding. The NWS advanced training goes far deeper.

It is incredible that those who bring CREDIT to the hobby are condemned by those who have apparently done nothing for the hobby -- and who apparently lack even basic understanding of disaster response. A serious and widespread disaster was first warned of, then responded to by TRAINED operators, working as a part of the team of first responders.

ROFL!!! I just love it. One can tell when it is safe to begin damage assessment!!

Read the story again, Larry, this time for meaning. As usual, you have glossed over what was said and just stooped to a personal attack.

I'll even quote the applicable part again: "went from house to house in the wind and the rain".

Now tell us again how he went out after it was safe. What does wind and rain tell most people about conditions, Larry? It's not what you just tried to say!

tim ab0wr

w6em
03-25-2008, 11:01 PM
wa5ben:

ROFL!!! I just love it. One can tell when it is safe to begin damage assessment!!

.......

tim ab0wr

We live about 125 miles due west of Atlanta. About 3 weeks ago, we were awakened not by our National Weather Service alert radio telling us of a tornado warning, or even a watch, but the adjoining county's tornado warning sirens. We thought it was a fluke and went back to sleep.

I even turned on the weather radio to listen to see if, for some reason, it had not alerted us automatically.

The next day, I watched the story unfold on TV. A tornado went through the middle of Leeds in the wee hours of the morning and tore up several houses and roofs. One fatality from a downed tree. There could have been more.

So, even the NWS isn't perfect.

If this person from Atlanta went out when it was stilling raining hard and the wind was blowing, there was likely good reason for lightning activity as well as the possibility for more tornados. The time to search is, as you say, after all danger has passed.

ab0wr
03-26-2008, 01:14 PM
We live about 125 miles due west of Atlanta. About 3 weeks ago, we were awakened not by our National Weather Service alert radio telling us of a tornado warning, or even a watch, but the adjoining county's tornado warning sirens. We thought it was a fluke and went back to sleep.

I even turned on the weather radio to listen to see if, for some reason, it had not alerted us automatically.

The next day, I watched the story unfold on TV. A tornado went through the middle of Leeds in the wee hours of the morning and tore up several houses and roofs. One fatality from a downed tree. There could have been more.

So, even the NWS isn't perfect.

If this person from Atlanta went out when it was stilling raining hard and the wind was blowing, there was likely good reason for lightning activity as well as the possibility for more tornados. The time to search is, as you say, after all danger has passed.

You *pegged* it. If it is still blowing and raining it is quite likely the front has not finished moving through. Just one more likely customer for the first responders to worry about.

tim ab0wr

n7wr
03-26-2008, 01:49 PM
Tim
Haven't you heard? According to the "experts" (self defined anyhow) amateur radio operators ARE First Responders!!!

KB1SF
03-27-2008, 09:02 PM
People have crammed for license exams ever since a standard test was created, including when we had tests administered by the FCC -- both amateur and commercial. The FCC finally did away with the First Class Radiotelephone license because of the large number of DJ's who literally could not find the master switch, but who fully satisfied the FCC license requirement that there must be a First Class license holder at the station when it was transmitting.

The interesting thing is that many of those "license mill" license holders actually became interested in the technical side, and some became very knowledgeable engineers. Quite a few ended up getting their ham tickets.

I was not thrilled when the FCC chose not to renew all First Class (and Second Class) Radiotelephone Licenses, and "replaced" them with a Lifetime General Radiotelephone License. The fact remains,however, that the licenses had become useless for the original intent and purpose -- ensuring technical competence. (Interestingly, the test for amateur Advanced Class was more rigorous than the test for the First Class Radiotelephone License.)

The simple fact is that ham radio is a hobby that is quite diverse in both theory and practice. It exposes people to a wide range of possible interests, and offers them unique capabilities.

Some people choose to become electronic engineers. Some of those choose to design circuits, others to design antennas, others to design systems, others to write code, others to manage projects, others to perform pure research, others to do technical sales, and others to teach. One does not have to do everything to be a good engineer.

Similarly, one does not have to do everything in ham radio to be a good ham. The ham who only wishes to do CW on a straight key may be a good ham, as may the person who only wishes to use his/her equipment to support his/her community. Conversely, each may be a disgrace to the hobby.



Agreed.

So, why has anyone not given any thought to simply making the content and comprehensiveness of our exams actually commensurate with the privileges they grant?

Right now, MOST of the content and comprehensiveness of what's on the General Class examination (and ALL of what's on the Extra Class exam) goes WELL beyond what is minimally required by the international Radio Regulations to provide a reasonable assurance that such license holders will operate their stations in a safe and courteous manner.

Unfortunately, that fact also now makes those tests systemically discriminatory (spelled “illegal”) under a whole plethora of current US federal equal access laws as well.

However, and as you imply, FAR too many people in our ranks still seem to (mistakenly) believe that the technical aspects of Amateur Radio are the sole purpose for its existence. If those people would take the time to actually look at the international definition of our Service (what Part 97 is supposed to have been based on), they might be surprised to find that the technical aspects of our Service are meant to be only ONE part of it.

To wit, the International Telecommunications Union (the ITU which regulates our Service internationally) says that ours is to be a "radiocommunication service in which radio apparatus are used for the purpose of self-training, intercommunication AND (emphasis mine) technical investigation by individuals who are interested in radio technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest."

Note the ITU uses the words "intercommunication" and "self-training" ALONG WITH words about "technical investigation" as equal tenets in that definition. And NOWHERE in that definition (or in the guidelines that accompany it) does it state TO WHAT LEVEL that “technical investigation” is supposed to be carried out.

Unfortunately, I firmly believe the declining popularity of our Service to newcomers over the last half-century has been caused, at least in part, by the FCC's decision over 50 years ago to "dumb up" what used to just be a simple series of licensing tests for our Service.

They called it "incentive licensing" and it has now morphed into a licensing system that has clearly over-emphasized the "technical investigation" (some would also say "professional") aspects of our Service at the obvious expense of the "personal" and "communicating" parts of the ITU definition regarding who and what we are supposed to be.

And, as I have said, there are still FAR too many licensed operators in our ranks who bought into the FCC's fraudulent "incentive" bill of goods back then who are now STILL trying their level best to hang onto that rapidly dying (not to mention systemically discriminatory) elitist dream. This fact is clearly evident by all the passionate comments expressed here and elsewhere about the so-called "dumbing down" of our licensing system.

What such people STILL refuse to understand (let alone accept!) is that there was entirely too much technical overkill put into the licensing system (i.e. it was “dumbed up”) when the FCC (at the urging of the ARRL) first hatched their stupid "incentive licensing" foolishness back in the 1950s and 1960s.

Most US Hams are also blissfully ignorant of the fact that (thankfully!) most governments in the rest of the world steadfastly refrained from buying into the FCC's incentive licensing overkill for THEIR Amateur Services. In fact, throughout the rest of the world, Amateur licenses are usually regarded simply as “certificates of safety", much like the written test one takes to obtain a license to operate a private motor vehicle.

That is, such licenses are specifically designed to do absolutely NOTHING MORE than provide a reasonable assurance to government regulators that an applicant for a Ham license won't become a safety hazard to his or her self (or their neighbors) or otherwise become a nuisance to their neighbors, to others on the bands, or to other services.

What's more, elsewhere in the world, the Amateur Service is largely regulated by bandwidth, NOT by license class and operating mode as it is here in the United States. Needless to say, this FAR more progressive approach to regulating our Service elsewhere provides those other administrations with a great deal more flexibility than we in the United States now have to change band allocations and permitted emission types as the technology (and the popularity of that technology) changes.

On the other hand, (and largely because of the FCC's "incentive licensing" foolishness) OUR frequency and regulated sub-band allocations still largely reflect Amateur Radio technology as it existed in the late 1950s.

Talk about "dumbing down" our Service!

What's more, in most other countries, the safety issue of power output (vice frequency and operating mode) is often the central factor that differentiates one license class from another.

That is, outside of the United States, Amateur Radio licenses are usually officially viewed as "licenses to learn" rather than as a series of elitist "badges of honor" that one has successfully endured a series of largely meaningless "hazing rituals" and assorted other completely irrelevant, ego-stroking "rights of passage" in order to be able to operate in the so-called "exclusive" portions of our internationally allocated Ham bands.

Or, to put it another way, the FCC's "incentive incensing" approach attempts to cram seldom (if ever) used information down EVERYONE'S throats in exchange for the sole "rewards" of greater frequency and operating mode privileges and the possible chance to obtain an “exclusive” call sign. This means the tests used to obtain such additional privileges cannot be directly related to ANY operational need because the "exclusive" privileges granted by passing them are designed, first and foremost, to further stroke already over-inflated egos...NOT to determine one's operational fitness to actually operate in those "exclusive" frequency sub-bands.

That is, there is a horrific (I say illegally discriminatory) disconnect in our testing structure between the content and comprehensiveness of the exams we have to take (and pass) beyond the Technician license and the minuscule, largely ego-based privileges these additional licenses grant. And what makes the whole FCC licensing approach for our Service even more of a FARCE is that such so-called "elite" privileges are ROUTINELY granted to Hams in other parts of the world for completing substantially less comprehensive exams!

Would someone please explain to me what SPECIFIC additional technical or operational skills (beyond those required to obtain a General Class license) are absolutely required to safely and courteously operate in the so-called “Extra Class” portions of our bands? And, how does mastering the test material needed to successfully PASS that Extra Class license examination DIRECTLY relate in ANY way to the skills required to fill out an application for a so-called “exclusive” call sign?

The bottom line here is that most of rest of the world's Amateur Radio licensees are NOT tied to a set of silly (not to mention increasingly irrelevant) achievement tests in a licensing system that looks for all the world like the adult version of the Boy Scouts…complete with the requirement to earn a specified number of "merit badges" before being allowed to progress on to the next higher "class".

By now, it should be painfully obvious that all the 1950s era, "techno-snob appeal" built into our current licensing structure is no longer a motivator for most people to join our ranks and then upgrade all the way to Extra Class. Otherwise, why have nearly half of all US Hams never even bothered to upgrade beyond the Technician license? And why is our Ham population now continuing to shrink rather than expand?

Sadly, ours has now become a slowly dying Radio Service and our ever-aging demographics prove it. It is an irrefutable fact that our average age is now approaching 60 and the number of Amateur Radio licensees hasn't grown in the United States since 2003. BOTH of these trends show absolutely NO sign of reversing themselves anytime soon.

By any measure, THE most significant threat to our long-term health as a Service has absolutely NOTHING at all to do with the “dumbing down” of our standards. Rather, the MOST significant threat to our Service is that, as I've said, the average Ham in the United States is now approaching 60 years old. It doesn't take a BSEE to figure out that, unless things RADICALLY change, the day is not too far off when ("dumbed down" standards or no "dumbed down" standards) there won't be anyone left to talk to on our bands.

As I've said in this and other forums, and based on their regulatory actions in our Service over the last 20 years (including their latest decision to drop all forms of Morse testing), it's absolutely clear the FCC has (finally!) recognized the horrific, constrictive mess their predecessors made of our licensing and regulatory system when they first hatched their stupid "license-class-and-operating-mode-based" foolishness back in the 1950s.

And, as a direct result of that realization, I also firmly believe the FCC (with the ARRL's behind-the-scenes tacit approval) has now embarked on a plan that will largely de-regulate our Service, allowing it to revert back to the time when our licensing system was simply comprised of forward-looking licenses to learn rather than a meaningless series of ego-stroking "rewards" tied to an ever-more irrelevant, set of backward looking "achievement tests" that do absolutely nothing but perpetuate (now blatantly illegal) institutionalized snobbery.

Whether these changes will prove to be “too little too late” for our Service remains yet to be seen.

73,

Keith
KB1SF / VA3KSF