View Full Version : Most Ron Paul threads are started by RP Detractors
KG4JYD
01-30-2008, 02:06 AM
Apparently Ron Paul must be hitting a nerve with the big government types because they are creating more threads about him than are his supporters. :rolleyes:
KC9IUX
01-30-2008, 02:08 AM
And posting gay porn.
Why don't you run a search on your call and then tell me you wrote that with a straight face?
Deluded about their candidate.
Deluded about his abilities.
Deluded about the world.
Speaking of being consistent.
Could have fooled me, thought that JYD guy was a supporter.
KC9IUX
01-30-2008, 02:36 AM
Hush, Lister.
Your obsessive hate is pitiful.
From avitard to posts.
Seek help.
kc2orw
01-30-2008, 03:10 AM
Apparently Ron Paul must be hitting a nerve with the big government types because they are creating more threads about him than are his supporters. :rolleyes:
Sure it does but it may be more about worrying if there would be food & fuel riots if for some reason Ron Paul got elected then any concerns of big government. But before he got that far he would first have to deal with is Congress, the Supreme Court, and Impeachment proceedings. I figure to get his way he would have to overuse executive orders and thus be under threat of impeachment. Considering where Congress is at the moment I think he would have very few defenders.
See no more silliness this time just the scenario I see, if it could happen, and you know what stranger things then that have happened in USA politics. So we must voice our concerns about what a Ron Paul Presidency could lead to.
I don't see anyone disputing that the scenario I painted (food and fuel riots) could be, I just see people almost pushing for this type of situation, not smart.
Ron Paul Can't make jobs there gone (nobody can), so most likely if he could do what he wanted then there would be less jobs. If there were less jobs there will be more desperate people. Desperate people are dangerous that is why the welfare system got created in the first place to prevent a bloodbath. Too many people think they are safe in desperate times I figure they might have miscalculated. But if enough people want it so be it at least I still have some more archaic skills from the past can others lay claim to that, especially the younger folks who don't know which end of a hammer to hold without a computer or an iPod to use as a reference?
KG4JYD
01-30-2008, 06:04 AM
Ron Paul Can't make jobs there gone (nobody can), so most likely if he could do what he wanted then there would be less jobs.Is English your second language? This sentence makes zero sense on several levels. :rolleyes:
kc2orw
01-30-2008, 06:23 AM
Is English your second language? This sentence makes zero sense on several levels. :rolleyes:
All you have to do is read it feel free to explain what you meant.
Ron Paul can't create anything, he as all of the others, can only work with the given situation.
So how is he going to make my life better will there be more opportunity or less.
Please feel free to explain but expect some dispute, heck I promise not to be the one to dispute. Feel free to do this but don't bother with the youtube links and his web site thats just BS as any candidates web site is.
This is your big chance you can try and convince us or you can just continue to assault us. If all you have is the assault then RP hasn't got a chance...
Go ahead... I'm listening or rather reading you can start tomorrow as I am going to sleep now...
Good Night.
KG4JYD
01-30-2008, 06:45 AM
Ron Paul can't create anything,He can create a surplus.
So how is he going to make my life better will there be more opportunity or less. Get the government off your back. Lower the inflation tax. Get rid of the income tax. Offer an option to opt out of social security. Lower or eliminiate the fuel tax and other federal taxes. Overall economic reform.
This is your big chance you can try and convince us or you can just continue to assault us. Read this: http://ronpaullibrary.org/
It's writings and speeches from Ron from the last 20 years. I can't speak for him, so read what he has to say. Oh - and these are not cute little sound bites and TV interviews with vague plans and marketed strategies, the information contained on http://ronpaullibrary.org/ is pretty much everything Ron has had to say in the last few decades.
kc2orw
01-30-2008, 07:43 AM
Pretty slim this has all been heard before and the ramifications are not explained. Alright I think RP is toast as he really hasn't got anything tangible to offer.
Well you had your chance and I figured you would blow it this is just more NeoCon rubbish sans the chicken hawk routine.
Well not to worry I am swearing off bothering with Ron Paul threads but there are still at least 7 others you have to contend with. So aren't off the hook just yet
W3MIV
01-30-2008, 02:05 PM
He can create a surplus.
How can he do that without the Congress? Name one single member of Congress who will support the midget once he has ascended to the throne.
Get the government off your back. Lower the inflation tax. Get rid of the income tax. Offer an option to opt out of social security. Lower or eliminiate the fuel tax and other federal taxes. Overall economic reform.
Please refer to my question just above, and inform us just how the esteemed Herr Doktor will accomplish these marvels shorn of any Congressional support.
Read this: http://ronpaullibrary.org/
It's writings and speeches from Ron from the last 20 years. I can't speak for him, so read what he has to say. Oh - and these are not cute little sound bites and TV interviews with vague plans and marketed strategies, the information contained on http://ronpaullibrary.org/ is pretty much everything Ron has had to say in the last few decades.
Most of us have encountered a sufficiency of Paul's Little Red Book to understand how little of it really makes senses in the real world of politics and effective government. When his campaign collapses on the evening of February 5, you might suggest to the esteemed Li'l Doc that he might want to sell his writings to Jay Leno or one of the others who need a regular supply of jokes.
;)
KD6NIG
01-30-2008, 02:44 PM
All of you suckers errr loyal supporters who donated millions to him will be getting it back, right?
Or did you finance his retirement?
Super Tuesday is coming fast, every other political group has ads going like crazy in CA for all the propositions, for the primary race too, not ONE from Mr Paul, I guess hes just sitting on that "War Chest" and letting it earn interest, eh?
:eek:
K7JEM
01-30-2008, 03:33 PM
Who's Ron Paul ?
He's the guy that got 60,000 votes in the FL republican primary, out of almost 2 million cast, but thinks he will somehow get the republican nomination.
Nutty? You decide, I just report.
Joe
W3MIV
01-30-2008, 04:07 PM
Who's Ron Paul ?
The contraction makes your question hard to interpret. I presume you meant to type "Who WAS Ron Paul?" did you not?
If that is the case, I can answer: Ron Paul is the bilko artist now mining the vermin behind the baseboards and under the rotting logs of the internet for a windfall of suckers aborning in a form of political "spontaneous generation." A grifter's grifter working the freak show.
He has managed to defraud them of millions, and will shortly depart for sunnier climes to chortle over his haul.
KB1KIX
01-30-2008, 08:48 PM
Apparently Ron Paul must be hitting a nerve with the big government types because they are creating more threads about him than are his supporters. :rolleyes:
Um... nooooot!
Jonathan
KG4JYD
01-30-2008, 09:15 PM
How can he do that without the Congress? It's real simple. Congress gives the President a budget. If the President spends LESS than what he is given that means there is a surplus.
Ron Paul has a history of giving money BACK to Congress by spending less on his Congressional office budget each year.
When his campaign collapses on the evening of February 5, And you are a troll.
But to answer your question - it won't matter how good he does on Feb 5th because of two reasons. First off when Feb 6 rolls around Huck will drop and Ron will be the only conservative left in the race. Secondly, less than half of the States will have had their primaries on Feb 6th. Third, we are headed toward a brokered convention which means that ANYTHING can happen.
KG4JYD
01-30-2008, 09:18 PM
Or did you finance his retirement?
Ron can't use that money for personal use.
Super Tuesday is coming fast, every other political group has ads going like crazy in CA for all the propositions, for the primary race too, not ONE from Mr Paul, I guess hes just sitting on that "War Chest" and letting it earn interest, eh?No, he is holding out on his $20 million until after Huckabee drops.
He can create a surplus.
Actually so far it looks like he can create a "I'm throwing in the towel speech," 'cause that's as far as he's going. Nobody ever won the presidency with 3%.
Oh and can somebody penetrate the Kool aid and tell Ron Paul supporters that just because you don't like reality, or just because you don't like a post, it isn't a troll. I have literally heard that for every post that they don't like. Every ONE!
KB1KIX
01-30-2008, 10:07 PM
I don't think anyone has won the presidency with 3%, or even double, triple and I might even say quadruple - but I would have to look at some very old election data!
Jonathan
KG4JYD
01-30-2008, 10:48 PM
Nobody ever won the presidency with 3%.We'll see what it is after Super Tuesday but it is still possible he can win where he is currently at.
AE6IP
01-30-2008, 11:15 PM
inform us just how the esteemed Herr Doktor will accomplish these marvels shorn of any Congressional support.
To be fair, Albert, I'm sure Dr Paul will have as much Congressional support as he has now as a congressman. I mean, look at all those bills of his and how they all . . ., er, um, die in subcommittee because he can't even get enough support to get them onto the committee agenda....
never mind.
AE6IP
01-30-2008, 11:17 PM
It's real simple. Congress gives the President a budget. If the President spends LESS than what he is given that means there is a surplus.
Um, no, that's not the definition of a surplus.
AE6IP
01-30-2008, 11:20 PM
No, he is holding out on his $20 million until after Huckabee drops.
Huckabee won't drop out before Tsunami Tuesday is over.
If Paul shows as poorly there as he's done here, twenty million won't make any difference at all to the contests that are left.
And no, the childish idea that he can get attention by running attack ads on McCain and Romney isn't going to play out as his supporters wish, even if Paul is as dumb as they are and tries it.
KB1KIX
01-30-2008, 11:22 PM
I've said it before.... I'll say it again.
How much did Dean have and where did he end up?
yeeeeeeaaaaaawwwwwww!!!!
Jonathan
KG4JYD
01-31-2008, 01:43 AM
Um, no, that's not the definition of a surplus.Enlighten us... (I don't know why I'm feeding the troll) :rolleyes:
AE6IP
01-31-2008, 03:33 AM
Enlighten us... (I don't know why I'm feeding the troll) :rolleyes:
You know why: I'm not trolling, and you're wrong about what constitutes a surplus.
It's not how much the president spends compared to how much he's budgeted to spend. It's how much the entire government spends compared to how much it takes in.
But then, you probably mistakenly think that the executive branch is the only branch that spends money and that the president has complete discretionary control over the executive branch budget.
and budget surpluses are easy: you just project more revenue than you've chosen to spend. It's real surpluses that are hard.
w5srg
01-31-2008, 03:47 AM
Apparently Ron Paul must be hitting a nerve with the big government types because they are creating more threads about him than are his supporters. :rolleyes:
If not for his libertarian stance on drugs, I'd vote for him over the other two hacks.
KG4JYD
01-31-2008, 03:57 AM
If not for his libertarian stance on drugs, I'd vote for him over the other two hacks.He is not running on a "libertarian stance on drugs". He is running as a Constitutionalist. The federal government is not granted the power to fight a war on drugs, but the individual states can. Ron realizes this and wants to return back to the Constitutional principles of letting the States do what they want.
Enlighten us... (I don't know why I'm feeding the troll) :rolleyes:
Then just stop eating Matt.
;)
k9kjm
01-31-2008, 08:49 AM
Quote:
"If not for his libertarian stance on drugs, I'd vote for him over the other two hacks."
Years ago I started to understand that the Libertarian party had some good ideas, But some things they said just seemed to be far too radical.
NOW, With the 20-20 hindsight of history, I am starting to understand that
those ideas I thought were so radical, Are REALLY CORRECT!
I have seen first hand, From the inside just how this "War on drugs" Has done nothing but destroy lives and enrich lots of people! Like alcohol prohibition, Creating a huge black market and profitable criminal enterprises.
RON PAUL has the right ideas about how to start to bring this country back to it's senses. I will be voting for him.
K9KJM- Deputy Sheriff, Retired after 23 years of full time service.
KG4JYD
01-31-2008, 05:18 PM
NOW, With the 20-20 hindsight of history, I am starting to understand that
those ideas I thought were so radical, Are REALLY CORRECT!
I have seen first hand, From the inside just how this "War on drugs" Has done nothing but destroy lives and enrich lots of people! Like alcohol prohibition, Creating a huge black market and profitable criminal enterprises.
RON PAUL has the right ideas about how to start to bring this country back to it's senses. I will be voting for him.
K9KJM- Deputy Sheriff, Retired after 23 years of full time service.
Exactly. The drug war should be known as the "gang financing act". If prohibition of drugs was ended tomorrow, the gangs and the thugs would have zero money. MANY problems would go away instantly if the federal government reversed its unconstitutional policy.
Oh and I don't use drugs nor have I ever.