The Myth of the Liberal Media BUSTED!

[n2nh]

Thanks Danno for Proving that the Myth of the Liberal Media is only real to conspiracy theorists. (http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=149304)

[n2nh]

Once again, thanks Danno for proving my point. :D

[K3XR]

More good news about the hate America media.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2008-01-31-ny-times_N.htm?csp=34

http://newsbusters.org/node/18892/print

[K3XR]

Where's the beef, I mean the WAR??

http://newsbusters.org/node/18897/print

[kc2orw]

Ah I see they still have suicide bombers in Baghdad, demoralizing the Iraqi public, but it's a big win. Yay we won let's pack it up and go home!

[n2ize]

Where's the beef, I mean the WAR??

http://newsbusters.org/node/18897/print

I agree.There is no war in Iraq. Call it what it is... an OCCUPATION.

[K3XR]

Here we go again.

http://newsbusters.org/node/18907/print

[K3XR]

More LIB media "myth".

http://newsbusters.org/node/19289/print

[N9MOQ]

We constantly hear the term "the liberal media" over and over again from the media. Why would the "liberal media" keep calling themselves the liberal media?

[w5klb]

I agree.There is no war in Iraq. Call it what it is... an OCCUPATION.


"Occupation" may the liberal/socialist term, but true patriots like myself and the citizen of Iraq have a more accurate term. We call it:

LIBERATION

:cool:

[K3XR]

Castro and the Clinton News Network, what's up with this??

http://newsbusters.org/node/19336/print

http://newsbusters.org/node/19346/print

[N3ATS]

The liberal media makes an oopsy!

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=823_1203484714

[K3XR]

NY Slimes, on cue. Yes, the LIB media loves McCain when he's attacking Conservatives, count on them trashing him now that he's in front.

http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/02/pinch_sulzbergers_legacy.html

[K3XR]

What about Barry??

http://www.aim.org/press-release/print/aim-editor-says-times-damages-mccain-urges-probe-of-obamas-far-left-ties/

[K3XR]

"Scumbag Journalism".

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.aspx?GUID=173EC91B-7FA1-4939-9C73-B54F9CC55C3F

[K3XR]

Love the LIB media, they provide so much material.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19497/print

[K3XR]

How to play the LIB media is he an R or a D. Hint, they will always tell you if he is an R.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19525/print

[K3XR]

"Gray Lady Down"..

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/02/27/gray-lady-down/?print=1

[K3XR]

The people slime the NY Slimes.
http://newsbusters.org/node/19541/print

[K3XR]

As if facts would matter to the NY Slimes (or ZED LIBS, for that matter.)

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/nyt-pretends-mccain-cant-be-president

[K3XR]

CBS tries to do one better on the Dan Rather phony documents story.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/print/019926.php

[N9XR]

Do you really believe anything from the Cheney BS network? Or the Condoleeza News Network Danno?

[kc2orw]

Do you really believe anything from the Cheney BS network? Or the Condoleeza News Network Danno?
He only believes the Excrement In Broadcasting Network, he gets all his links via his subscription :D

[K3XR]

Oh darn, they missed another one.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19626/print

[n2nh]

"Occupation" may the liberal/socialist term, but true patriots like myself and the citizen of Iraq have a more accurate term. We call it:

LIBERATION

:cool:

True Patriots don't hide from the truth. As far as Iraqis:

As of Sept. 2006:

Views of US-led Forces in Iraq
Seven in ten Iraqis want US-led forces to commit to withdraw within a year. An overwhelming majority believes that the US military presence in Iraq is provoking more conflict than it is preventing. More broadly, most feel the US is having a predominantly negative influence in Iraq and have little or no confidence in the US military. If the US made a commitment to withdraw, a majority believes that this would strengthen the Iraqi government. Majorities believe that the withdrawal of US troops would lead to a reduction in the amount of inter-ethnic violence and improvement in the day-to-day security of Iraqis. A modest majority, including a large majority of Shia, now believes that in the near future Iraqi security forces will be strong enough to deal with their security challenges without foreign forces.

US HELP NOT WANTED BY IRAQIS. (http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/sep06/Iraq_Sep06_rpt.pdf)

OCCUPATION:
1. The act or process of holding or possessing a place.
2. The state of being held or possessed.
3. Invasion, conquest, and control of a nation or territory by foreign armed forces.
4. The military government exercising control over an occupied nation or territory.

If you insist.

[W4DFW]

True Patriots don't hide from the truth. As far as Iraqis:

As of Sept. 2006:



US HELP NOT WANTED BY IRAQIS. (http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/pdf/sep06/Iraq_Sep06_rpt.pdf)



If you insist.

I wouldn't exactly call this a peer reviewed study. Not one iota of how they conducted the study, just whining conclusions much like the NY Times.

[n2ize]

"Occupation" may the liberal/socialist term, but true patriots like myself and the citizen of Iraq have a more accurate term. We call it:

LIBERATION

:cool:

I guess this is part of that liberation process.

http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Iranian_President_in_landmark_trip__03022008.html

http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Ahmadinejad_calls_Iraq_brotherly__03022008.html

[K3XR]

No shock here....

http://newsbusters.org/node/19661/print

[K3XR]

Yes, it happens on a daily basis with the LIB media.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19688/print

[wa8rti]

Hmm-anything like the media that indentified people as Democrats who had been busted for crimes when they were in fact Republicans. It has happened several times. Such mis-identification is just as bad as a non indentification. :rolleyes:

[K3XR]

Do you prefer news, or diversity??

http://newsbusters.org/node/19703/print

[n2nh]

Do you prefer news, or diversity??

http://newsbusters.org/node/19703/print

I certainly don't expect either from Danno. :rolleyes:

[kc2orw]

I certainly don't expect either from Danno. :rolleyes:
Danno certainly does a good job of proving there are a lot of alternate reality news sites out there. I haven't tabulated all his sources but the Conservative alternate reality seems well represented. At best we could safely say there is more then one page for every political reality that exist and the Liberal media is not any more represented then many other political slants. :D

[n2nh]

I wouldn't exactly call this a peer reviewed study. Not one iota of how they conducted the study, just whining conclusions much like the NY Times.

That's because you have this confused with a study. It's not a study. It's a poll. It doesn't need peer review. As far as 'whining conclusions like the NY Times,' just because you disagree, doesn't make them equal to something else you disagree with. They can't all slant the news all the time like Fox.

As to how they conducted the poll, it is there in black and white. A bit after the part where it says:

-A WorldPublicOpinion.org POLL- ;)

[n2nh]

Danno certainly does a good job of proving there are a lot of alternate reality news sites out there. I haven't tabulated all his sources but the Conservative alternate reality seems well represented. At best we could safely say there is more then one page for every political reality that exist and the Liberal media is not any more represented then many other political slants. :D

*SIGH* We can't all be the great newsy that Danno is. What a pity his genius is wasted here. The local waste treatment plant is always looking for his kind of talent.:p

[W5GA]

They can't all slant the news all the time like Fox.
;)

No, they can't. In the case of CBS, CNN, NBC and CBS they slant it all the way to the other side all the time.

[n2nh]

No, they can't. In the case of CBS, CNN, NBC and CBS they slant it all the way to the other side all the time.

I'll bet you, Elvis and the Yeti talk about this all the time on the UFO.
:D

[K3XR]

Isn't this very cozy??

http://newsbusters.org/node/19708/print

[W5GA]

I'll bet you, Elvis and the Yeti talk about this all the time on the UFO.
:D


And just what exactly is wrong with my UFO??????? Did I get the wrong color or something? :D

[n2nh]

And just what exactly is wrong with my UFO??????? Did I get the wrong color or something? :D

;):D
===============

[kc2orw]

I'll bet you, Elvis and the Yeti talk about this all the time on the UFO.
:D
I switched on O'Reilly a while back and he was talking to some... individual who was going on about why Elvis did a couple of decent movies before the army and the silly ones after the army. It was this individual contention that the army turned Elvis into a drug zombie and that his career was ruined by that. The trouble is that Elvis made a ton of money doing concerts, new song releases, dopey movies, and performing in Las Vegas. So was it an example of him being ruined by drugs by the army or was he tremendously successful and the heck with doing quality movies. So he got old and fat that isn't that strange many get old and fat. Elvis made money right up to the time of his death and his family and associates got richer after he died.
Boy that O'Reilly can sure find ridiculous stuff to put on his show, including lots of blurred pictures of scantily clad young women. Oh well if it keeps em watching who's to argue with success :D

[k3roj]

We constantly hear the term "the liberal media" over and over again from the media. Why would the "liberal media" keep calling themselves the liberal media?


All you have to do is watch FAUX (FOX) News for 10 minutes and you will see favoritism towards who they think should receive recognition. We all know that people of Israel control our media but why would they want someone like Obama to be our president? Perhaps it is a plan just to get their Republican McCain in office so they can have him invade Iran next after another 9/11?

[KC4HGH]

Just read the chapter in Ann Coulter's book, "Slander" about the liberal media...footnoted for references and all. Very informative.

Note: the real "faux" news is on the "Alphabet Networks"....

[N9XR]

Was that the chapter where she talks about how erotic it is for her lovers to massage her Adam's Apple?

[K3XR]

Show us your ID....

http://newsbusters.org/node/19755/print

[n2ize]

Show us your ID....

I'll show you my id if you show me your id. But I think your superego will get in the way.

[K3XR]

NPR and the extreme LEFT.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19770/print

[K3XR]

Wonder why??

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/shocker-americans-dont-trust-the-media

[K3XR]

LIB media, how can that be Dan, you must be mistaken.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19808/print

[K3XR]

LIB media makes it so easy to prove a point.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19813/print

[K3XR]

Spitzer and LIB media, fun to watch.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19840/print

http://newsbusters.org/node/19841/print

[K3XR]

NYT whitewash....

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/how-the-nyt-whitewashed-obamas-pastor/print/

[KB9YCO]

I don't know if this has been posted, I wasn't about to wade through the ten thousand XR links to extremist propaganda nonsense. I just thought this was an interesting study about the so-called liberal media. As it turns out the media really isn't liberal or conservative, it's all about money, power, control, and in many cases downright propaganda.

The Myth of the Liberal Media: The Propaganda Model of News:

Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky demolish one of the central tenets of our political culture, the idea of the "liberal media." Instead, utilizing a systematic model based on massive empirical research, they reveal the manner in which the news media are so subordinated to corporate and conservative interests that their function can only be described as that of "elite propaganda."

...The business of media is overwhelming the business of democracy, as a narrowing range of private media conglomerates shape a widening range of public space and discourse. From our schools to our streets, from politics and policy-making to mainstream media coverage of both, a reductive market logic has increased the demand for informed democratic discussion, deliberation and debate. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYlyb1Bx9Ic)

[K3XR]

Of course the LIB media wants it to go away, but thanks to the new media, the racist minister has been exposed.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19886/print

[ad4mg]

I don't know if this has been posted, I wasn't about to wade through the ten thousand XR links to extremist propaganda nonsense. I just thought this was an interesting study about the so-called liberal media. As it turns out the media really isn't liberal or conservative, it's all about money, power, control, and in many cases downright propaganda.

The Myth of the Liberal Media: The Propaganda Model of News:

Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky demolish one of the central tenets of our political culture, the idea of the "liberal media." Instead, utilizing a systematic model based on massive empirical research, they reveal the manner in which the news media are so subordinated to corporate and conservative interests that their function can only be described as that of "elite propaganda."

...The business of media is overwhelming the business of democracy, as a narrowing range of private media conglomerates shape a widening range of public space and discourse. From our schools to our streets, from politics and policy-making to mainstream media coverage of both, a reductive market logic has increased the demand for informed democratic discussion, deliberation and debate. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYlyb1Bx9Ic)

Please, Brett, try to avoid posting in the link-bot's poo pen! :eek:

[KB9YCO]

Please, Brett, try to avoid posting in the link-bot's poo pen! :eek:

Yeah, but it's so much fun, and no one else is doing it so... we must bring balance to the force!

Not to mention that whole "lib" thing is not only stupid, it's a complete mislabeling of people that are usually anything but liberal, on top of that everyone knows the media is out for top dollar sensationalism regardless of what direction they choose to spin at any given moment. Any angle that they deem currently popular is the moment I guess.

(Heheh, poo, he said poo, [this obligatory Beavis & Butthead moment brought to you buy the Republican National Committee.] heh, poo.)

[w2amr]

Please, Brett, try to avoid posting in the link-bot's poo pen! :eek:
I was wondering what that smell was.........

[n2ize]

I was wondering what that smell was.........

Aw foo !! He was on a roll and then you guys had to spoil it. I wanted to see how many posts in a row XR could rack up with no interruptions. I think the record so far is 10 or 12.

[ad4mg]

Aw foo !! He was on a roll and then you guys had to spoil it. I wanted to see how many posts in a row XR could rack up with no interruptions. I think the record so far is 10 or 12.

That was in his "Shrine to Hillary" thread. He dropped Hill for Barry.

[w2amr]

Aw foo !! He was on a roll and then you guys had to spoil it. I wanted to see how many posts in a row XR could rack up with no interruptions. I think the record so far is 10 or 12.
Wonder if anyone actually clicks on all of those links? :confused:

[K3XR]

Lib media defends Barry...

http://newsbusters.org/node/19903/print

[ad4mg]

Lib media defends Barry...

http://newsbusters.org/node/19903/print

Barry, Barry, it's always Barry. Infatuated with Barry. Hill is going to be so disappointed.

Somebody here just can't stop dreamin' of Barry.

Amusing.

[k5iq]

I am kinda disappointed in this thread...I had hoped to see a cogent discussion about that the hackneyed term Liberal Media, and instead got a never-ending series of links to the same ol' same ol'...

After 30+ years in the "liberal" media, some personal observations...

Some journalists (real news-gatherers, not political hand-maidens) may have personal ideologies that could be identified as liberal, but well-trained journalists will eschew personal ideology in favor of neutrality and balance. I have to wonder, though, if that which opponents label as "liberalism" isn't (in its Clark Kent secret identity) really the application of critical thinking. Maybe, just maybe, those journalists decried as "liberal" are just well educated and trained to question that which some believe should be unquestionable.

Too many journalists--especially in TV--are lazy. Me, too-ism is rampant. The rapid news cycle and Hollywood tawdriness have replaced shoe leather journalism, and one report is echoed again and again by the "me,too's". And, the advent of so-called news organizations whose job is really to convey the views of a single party has bred a whole class of talking-points parrots who are then echoed by the nominally neutral agencies all afraid of not getting their "me, too" in.

Most "Liberal News Media" are, in fact, owned by large corporations whose sole responsibility is to return money to investors. They are motivated primarily by profits, not politics. Those who point with glee at the NY Times having financial woes need to realize that virtually all newspapers are having problems. The cost of newsprint is up, advertising is down, and while the papers are still cranking out wheelbarrows full of cash...growth is what matters to Wall Street, and newspapers ain't exactly growth industries.

Further, with concentration of ownership of media (gee, thanks FCC!), more and more electronic media are only presenting overtly conservative (or what passes for conservative in these times) viewpoints; in my town if you tune across the radio dial you will hear the usual claque of conserv-o-talkers...Limbaugh, Hannity, et al, but you won't hear a note of liberalism from this branch of the so-called Liberal Media.

Speaking of the NY Times, although self-styled conservatives tend to waggle their Montgomery Burnsian bony fingers at the paper and decry its supposed liberalism, I'll bet few of the far-right crowd are aware that the Times has been under constant criticism by the political left...or at least since our Beloved Leader took office (particularly post-9/11). If the NY Times is so GD liberal, why--the question goes--did they so often soft-pedal the run-up to the disastrous war in Iraq and many of W's other follies?

The problem, of course, is that if we're looking for evidence of bias or incompetence or whatever...all we need to do is look to find just what we need to bolster our preconceived opinions. That the news business is liberal has been repeated so many times in the past 30 years, it is now accepted as a truism. And despite careful academic studies of the instances of alleged bias in journalism that reveal that the "Liberal Media" really isn't, those who believe what they believe will continue to believe despite any evidence to the contrary.

It's sort of like horoscopes: you can point out that the relative angular positions of light from long-dead stars as viewed thousands of years ago by a bunch of Earth-bound shepherds cannot possibly affect our personalities or our destinies, and yet people continue to believe. Okay, you're stubborn because you're a "Taurus", and the news media is filled with liberals.

It's all true, you know?

[nx6d]

I am kinda disappointed in this thread...I had hoped to see a cogent discussion about that the hackneyed term Liberal Media, and instead got a never-ending series of links to the same ol' same ol'...

After 30+ years in the "liberal" media, some personal observations...

Some journalists (real news-gatherers, not political hand-maidens) may have personal ideologies that could be identified as liberal, but well-trained journalists will eschew personal ideology in favor of neutrality and balance. I have to wonder, though, if that which opponents label as "liberalism" isn't (in its Clark Kent secret identity) really the application of critical thinking. Maybe, just maybe, those journalists decried as "liberal" are just well educated and trained to question that which some believe should be unquestionable.

Too many journalists--especially in TV--are lazy. Me, too-ism is rampant. The rapid news cycle and Hollywood tawdriness have replaced shoe leather journalism, and one report is echoed again and again by the "me,too's". And, the advent of so-called news organizations whose job is really to convey the views of a single party has bred a whole class of talking-points parrots who are then echoed by the nominally neutral agencies all afraid of not getting their "me, too" in.

Most "Liberal News Media" are, in fact, owned by large corporations whose sole responsibility is to return money to investors. They are motivated primarily by profits, not politics. Those who point with glee at the NY Times having financial woes need to realize that virtually all newspapers are having problems. The cost of newsprint is up, advertising is down, and while the papers are still cranking out wheelbarrows full of cash...growth is what matters to Wall Street, and newspapers ain't exactly growth industries.

Further, with concentration of ownership of media (gee, thanks FCC!), more and more electronic media are only presenting overtly conservative (or what passes for conservative in these times) viewpoints; in my town if you tune across the radio dial you will hear the usual claque of conserv-o-talkers...Limbaugh, Hannity, et al, but you won't hear a note of liberalism from this branch of the so-called Liberal Media.

Speaking of the NY Times, although self-styled conservatives tend to waggle their Montgomery Burnsian bony fingers at the paper and decry its supposed liberalism, I'll bet few of the far-right crowd are aware that the Times has been under constant criticism by the political left...or at least since our Beloved Leader took office (particularly post-9/11). If the NY Times is so GD liberal, why--the question goes--did they so often soft-pedal the run-up to the disastrous war in Iraq and many of W's other follies?

The problem, of course, is that if we're looking for evidence of bias or incompetence or whatever...all we need to do is look to find just what we need to bolster our preconceived opinions. That the news business is liberal has been repeated so many times in the past 30 years, it is now accepted as a truism. And despite careful academic studies of the instances of alleged bias in journalism that reveal that the "Liberal Media" really isn't, those who believe what they believe will continue to believe despite any evidence to the contrary.

It's sort of like horoscopes: you can point out that the relative angular positions of light from long-dead stars as viewed thousands of years ago by a bunch of Earth-bound shepherds cannot possibly affect our personalities or our destinies, and yet people continue to believe. Okay, you're stubborn because you're a "Taurus", and the news media is filled with liberals.

It's all true, you know?

Thank you for your contribution.

Unfortunately the ones who scream "liberal media" the loudest lack the intelligence to understand your post.

Dave NX6D
Modoc County, CA

[n2ize]

I am kinda disappointed in this thread...I had hoped to see a cogent discussion about that the hackneyed term Liberal Media, and instead got a never-ending series of links to the same ol' same ol'...

After 30+ years in the "liberal" media, some personal observations...

Some journalists (real news-gatherers, not political hand-maidens) may have personal ideologies that could be identified as liberal, but well-trained journalists will eschew personal ideology in favor of neutrality and balance. I have to wonder, though, if that which opponents label as "liberalism" isn't (in its Clark Kent secret identity) really the application of critical thinking. Maybe, just maybe, those journalists decried as "liberal" are just well educated and trained to question that which some believe should be unquestionable.

Too many journalists--especially in TV--are lazy. Me, too-ism is rampant. The rapid news cycle and Hollywood tawdriness have replaced shoe leather journalism, and one report is echoed again and again by the "me,too's". And, the advent of so-called news organizations whose job is really to convey the views of a single party has bred a whole class of talking-points parrots who are then echoed by the nominally neutral agencies all afraid of not getting their "me, too" in.

Most "Liberal News Media" are, in fact, owned by large corporations whose sole responsibility is to return money to investors. They are motivated primarily by profits, not politics. Those who point with glee at the NY Times having financial woes need to realize that virtually all newspapers are having problems. The cost of newsprint is up, advertising is down, and while the papers are still cranking out wheelbarrows full of cash...growth is what matters to Wall Street, and newspapers ain't exactly growth industries.

Further, with concentration of ownership of media (gee, thanks FCC!), more and more electronic media are only presenting overtly conservative (or what passes for conservative in these times) viewpoints; in my town if you tune across the radio dial you will hear the usual claque of conserv-o-talkers...Limbaugh, Hannity, et al, but you won't hear a note of liberalism from this branch of the so-called Liberal Media.

Speaking of the NY Times, although self-styled conservatives tend to waggle their Montgomery Burnsian bony fingers at the paper and decry its supposed liberalism, I'll bet few of the far-right crowd are aware that the Times has been under constant criticism by the political left...or at least since our Beloved Leader took office (particularly post-9/11). If the NY Times is so GD liberal, why--the question goes--did they so often soft-pedal the run-up to the disastrous war in Iraq and many of W's other follies?

The problem, of course, is that if we're looking for evidence of bias or incompetence or whatever...all we need to do is look to find just what we need to bolster our preconceived opinions. That the news business is liberal has been repeated so many times in the past 30 years, it is now accepted as a truism. And despite careful academic studies of the instances of alleged bias in journalism that reveal that the "Liberal Media" really isn't, those who believe what they believe will continue to believe despite any evidence to the contrary.

It's sort of like horoscopes: you can point out that the relative angular positions of light from long-dead stars as viewed thousands of years ago by a bunch of Earth-bound shepherds cannot possibly affect our personalities or our destinies, and yet people continue to believe. Okay, you're stubborn because you're a "Taurus", and the news media is filled with liberals.


Very well worded and accurate. Unfortunately over the heads and beyond the scope of those who post endless LIP about LIB media,

[K3XR]

Of course the LIB media is spinning it.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19929/print

[K3XR]

This should make the LIBS day, the New York FOX Times.

http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/NY_Times_Murdoch/2008/03/17/81057.html

[N5NPO]

Barry, Barry, it's always Barry. Infatuated with Barry. Hill is going to be so disappointed.

Somebody here just can't stop dreamin' of Barry.

Amusing.

You are bringing his: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Barry_Manilow_1979.jpg
image to mind....

Oh Mandy.... SEE WHAT YOU DID!!!!
Sheesh! I can't get that song out of my mind now....

[K3XR]

LIB media misses it again.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19948/print

[K3XR]

But you knew you could count on the LIB media.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19970/print

[K3XR]

Hey, LIB media, could we get some news, at least now and then?

http://newsbusters.org/node/19989/print

[K3XR]

LIB media tripping over each other to cover for Obama and his race baiting, hate America pastor.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19997/print

[KC4HGH]

I definitely see bias towards the left when viewing certain local TV stations' news. For instance, this scenario (and this happens all over the country):

- young (minority of your choice) home intruder killed by elderly home owner @ 3AM in the morning.

Left-wing-biased broadcast: screen flashes to large, screaming woman, "He murder my baby! My baby ain't done nothin'! Why he murder my baby! My baby gone! He ain't done nothin'!" Then the "journalist" procedes to lambast gun ownership and how gun laws could have prevented this death.

Another more "conservative" TV station, or a radio station, would expand on the news, interviewing the 70-something white male occupant/owner of the home, who lives alone. Flash to the sheriff's deputy/LEO and the interview reveals that the robber-turned-corpse has had a history of robberies, drug abuse and assaults on elderly individuals, who, up to now, have been easy targets for his drug money. In these cases, no charges are filed against the home owner.

Racial bias on my part? No, reality...it happens daily here in my city.

This is why many of us shun the "liberal" left-wing media, because of their emotional twisting of what they call news. Many of us just want the facts. Truth always exposes...why do so many in the media wish to suppress the truth?

Another case that just happened last night (3/20/08): 27-year-old female breaks into a home, beats an 82-year-old man over the head and tries to take his money...the elderly man defended himself with a shotgun. The radio host, an elderly gentleman himself, stated strongly that EVERY elderly person ought to have a shotgun.

Dunno if he shot the female, or just held her for the police....

American Rifleman publishes news- REAL news- of people defending themselves every day, while the left-biased media screams bloody murder over those who DO and ARE ABLE to protect themselves from these attacks....

[w2amr]

I definitely see bias towards the left when viewing certain local TV stations' news. For instance, this scenario (and this happens all over the country):

- young (minority of your choice) home intruder killed by elderly home owner @ 3AM in the morning.

Left-wing-biased broadcast: screen flashes to large, screaming woman, "He murder my baby! My baby ain't done nothin'! Why he murder my baby! My baby gone! He ain't done nothin'!" Then the "journalist" procedes to lambast gun ownership and how gun laws could have prevented this death.

Another more "conservative" TV station, or a radio station, would expand on the news, interviewing the 70-something white male occupant/owner of the home, who lives alone. Flash to the sheriff's deputy/LEO and the interview reveals that the robber-turned-corpse has had a history of robberies, drug abuse and assaults on elderly individuals, who, up to now, have been easy targets for his drug money. In these cases, no charges are filed against the home owner.

Racial bias on my part? No, reality...it happens daily here in my city.

This is why many of us shun the "liberal" left-wing media, because of their emotional twisting of what they call news. Many of us just want the facts. Truth always exposes...why do so many in the media wish to suppress the truth?

Another case that just happened last night (3/20/08): 27-year-old female breaks into a home, beats an 82-year-old man over the head and tries to take his money...the elderly man defended himself with a shotgun. The radio host, an elderly gentleman himself, stated strongly that EVERY elderly person ought to have a shotgun.

Dunno if he shot the female, or just held her for the police....

American Rifleman publishes news- REAL news- of people defending themselves every day, while the left-biased media screams bloody murder over those who DO and ARE ABLE to protect themselves from these attacks....

"American Rifleman publishes news- REAL news"

I love gun nutz:D

[n2ize]

I definitely see bias towards the left when viewing certain local TV stations' news. For instance, this scenario (and this happens all over the country):

- young (minority of your choice) home intruder killed by elderly home owner @ 3AM in the morning.

Left-wing-biased broadcast: screen flashes to large, screaming woman, "He murder my baby! My baby ain't done nothin'! Why he murder my baby! My baby gone! He ain't done nothin'!" Then the "journalist" procedes to lambast gun ownership and how gun laws could have prevented this death.


I know a coupel of other things that could have probably prevented both the death and the home instrusion as well as lots of other home intrusions and deaths. How about ENDING DRUG PROHIBITION. After damned near 100 years of drug prohibition we still haven't learned that IT DOES NOT WORK, that IT DOES NOT STOP DRUGS, and that all it does it CREATE CRIME of many different varieties.

But will you ever hear the so called "liberal media" talking about ending or changing the drug laws ?No. Is it because they are too liberal to talk about the waste that is called prohibition.

What about the fact that the left wing media would barely mention the anti war activism surrounding the Iraq war. Instead they dressed the media up to look like everyone was 100% for the Iraq invasion.

For every example you can give to describe this "left wing media" there are examples indicating the exact opposite.



Another more "conservative" TV station, or a radio station, would expand on the news, interviewing the 70-something white male occupant/owner of the home, who lives alone. Flash to the sheriff's deputy/LEO and the interview reveals that the robber-turned-corpse has had a history of robberies, drug abuse and assaults on elderly individuals, who, up to now, have been easy targets for his drug money. In these cases, no charges are filed against the home owner.


Maybe the homeowner was advised not to talk to the press. Maybe the sherrif didn't have much to say. Maybe if we had a sensible drug policy in the country along with less poverty crap like this wouldn't happen day in and day out.


Racial bias on my part? No, reality...it happens daily here in my city.


Bias yes. Racial ? Not nessesarilly.



Another case that just happened last night (3/20/08): 27-year-old female breaks into a home, beats an 82-year-old man over the head and tries to take his money...the elderly man defended himself with a shotgun. The radio host, an elderly gentleman himself, stated strongly that EVERY elderly person ought to have a shotgun.


OK ? So what does this mean ? That the media is biased left or right ? Of course the idea of sensible drug policy will never arise in the "left wing" corporate controlleed media.


Dunno if he shot the female, or just held her for the police....

American Rifleman publishes news- REAL news- of people defending themselves every day, while the left-biased media screams bloody murder over those who DO and ARE ABLE to protect themselves from these attacks....

Said correctly, the American Rifleman delivers news YOU WANT TO HEAR the way YOU WANT TO HEAR IT. Neither addresses the real issues nor the causes of any problems,

[K3XR]

How did this make it into the LIB media?

http://newsbusters.org/node/20036/print

[K3XR]

Take what the LIB media is telling you, and figure it's the opposite.

http://newsbusters.org/node/20059/print

[KC4HGH]

I know a coupel of other things that could have probably prevented both the death and the home instrusion as well as lots of other home intrusions and deaths. How about ENDING DRUG PROHIBITION. After damned near 100 years of drug prohibition we still haven't learned that IT DOES NOT WORK, that IT DOES NOT STOP DRUGS, and that all it does it CREATE CRIME of many different varieties.

But will you ever hear the so called "liberal media" talking about ending or changing the drug laws ?No. Is it because they are too liberal to talk about the waste that is called prohibition.

What about the fact that the left wing media would barely mention the anti war activism surrounding the Iraq war. Instead they dressed the media up to look like everyone was 100% for the Iraq invasion.

For every example you can give to describe this "left wing media" there are examples indicating the exact opposite.




Maybe the homeowner was advised not to talk to the press. Maybe the sherrif didn't have much to say. Maybe if we had a sensible drug policy in the country along with less poverty crap like this wouldn't happen day in and day out.



Bias yes. Racial ? Not nessesarilly.




OK ? So what does this mean ? That the media is biased left or right ? Of course the idea of sensible drug policy will never arise in the "left wing" corporate controlleed media.



Said correctly, the American Rifleman delivers news YOU WANT TO HEAR the way YOU WANT TO HEAR IT. Neither addresses the real issues nor the causes of any problems,

The American Rifleman gleans news from all over the country, from newspapers (one media reported to be controlled by the left) and TV/radio transcripts( another media reported to be controlled by the left). They are reporting things otherwise suppressed by the propogandist/drama-driven media.

What's the beef in quoting the media? What's y'alls angle at defamation of the media? Just because they don't report what YOU want to hear, it isn't true? Is it only the spin you want that matters?

As far as drugs are concerned, ANYTHING that alters the mind of an individual causes aberrant behavior, and that behavior is the problem...not guns or any other weapons...human behavior must be trated accordingly. Oh, yes, there ARE laws against aberrant human behavior, isn't there?

[w2amr]

Oh, yes, there ARE laws against aberrant human behavior, isn't there?
Apparently not here. :D

[ad4mg]

Who's posted here?

K3XR 36 :eek:

n2nh 8
n2ize 6
kc2orw 4
w2amr 4
KC4HGH 3
ad4mg 3
KB9YCO 2
W5GA 2
N9XR 2
N9MOQ 1
wa8rti 1
w5klb 1
W4DFW 1
k5iq 1
nx6d 1
N5NPO 1
k3roj 1
N3ATS 1

Gentlemen, please. This is a cyborg link-bot poo pen. It's rude to post in a poo pen, and it could be hazardous. These things are too dangerous to even make it as an EPA Superfund Site.

I urge you to use a little more restraint. :rolleyes:

[KB9YCO]

Who's posted here?

K3XR 36

n2nh 8
n2ize 6
kc2orw 4
w2amr 4
KC4HGH 3
ad4mg 3
KB9YCO 2
W5GA 2
N9XR 2
N9MOQ 1
wa8rti 1
w5klb 1
W4DFW 1
k5iq 1
nx6d 1
N5NPO 1
k3roj 1
N3ATS 1

Gentlemen, please. This is a cyborg link-bot poo pen. It's rude to post in a poo pen, and it could be hazardous. These things are too dangerous to even make it as an EPA Superfund Site.

I urge you to use a little more restraint.

Well hey, when you've got nothing to add on your own, JUST LINK, and let someone else talk (and think) for you!

[K3XR]

You kidding, the LIB media wouldn't do that.

http://newsbusters.org/node/20091/print

[n2ize]

Well hey, when you've got nothing to add on your own, JUST LINK, and let someone else talk (and think) for you!

Chalk up # 37 for XR. Wonder how long it will take him to hit 40.

[KB9YCO]

You kidding, the LIB media wouldn't do that.

http://newsbusters.org/node/20091/print

Wow, big surprise, another link to another partisan site that is just as worthless as the rest of the links to partisan sites. (Obviously you enjoy it, and the fact that people make fun of it and talk about it. Are you really that desperate for attention? I'm sure you're not a bad person, it would be nice to hear what YOU actually think for once, not what some biased website says for you. Although, now that I think about it, it might say something about you. Who knows? I don't know you so...)

Try this one on for size, and I'll make sure not to add my opinion, I let someone else do it for me!

Fact: The media are being increasingly monopolized by parent corporations with pro-corporate or conservative agendas. (http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-liberalmedia.htm)

[K3XR]

Count on Larry King Alive to enable Barry.

http://newsbusters.org/node/20093/print

[w2amr]

Would somebody get a shovel, the linkpoo pen is full. PU

[K3XR]

Good news for America, bad news for the LIB media.

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003781895

[ad4mg]

Good news for America, bad news for the LIB media.

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003781895

I'm not clicking it. Somebody else click it. I don't want internet boogers on my machine.

[K3XR]

Good news in Iraq, bad news for LIB media.

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/sadr-orders-militia-off-streets-media-despondent/print/

[N4VGB]

Good news in Iraq, bad news for LIB media.

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/sadr-orders-militia-off-streets-media-despondent/print/

al-Sadr's popularity was plunging quickly in Iraq over this latest little test of the waters and perhaps he lost a few too many followers in Basrah also.

It must be frustrating for al-Sadr, that much lusted for title of Supreme Leader of Iraq, just out of reach.

[K3XR]

More good LIB media news.

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/03/newsweek-buyouts-writers-david-ansen-gates.php

[K3XR]

Come on now, this is all a myth, right?

http://newsbusters.org/node/20291/print

[ad4mg]

http://mysite.verizon.net/ad4mg/poo-pen.jpg
..............................

[KB9YCO]

More bad CON news:

WorldNetDaily's Downward Spiral:

It started off last month by proclaiming that the truth was its defense in the then-upcoming trial for a libel lawsuit filed against it by Clark Jones, a supporter of Al Gore, whom WND attacked in a series of articles in 2000. WND asserted that nothing less than "the future of investigative journalism in the United States" was at stake -- even though it admitted in court papers that it didn't fact-check the articles before publishing them. A little more than a week later, however, WND settled the lawsuit as quietly as it could, admitting what it published about Jones was false and that "sources named in the publications have stated under oath that statements attributed to them in the articles were either not made by them, were misquoted by the authors, were misconstrued, or the statements were taken out of context."

Then, as if demonstrating that it learned nothing from having to shell out a lawsuit settlement because it failed to do simple fact-checking, WND promoted a man's salacious claims about Barack Obama -- going so far as to enlist its PR firm in the effort -- but giving no indication that it made any effort whatsoever to verify anything the man said. When the man failed a polygraph test, WND tried to quietly drop that as well.

Now, WND continues its blithe indifference to core journalistic principles... (http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2008/wndhomeschool.html)

(And I at least posted a portion of the article so that people don't have to click on some stupid page with a zillion pop ups and ads! Give it a try XR, that is if you really want people to read that trash that you post links to.)

[K3XR]

NY Slimes, bias, are you kidding??

http://newsbusters.org/node/20321/print

[KB9YCO]

YAWN, if you're going to post a link at least include some of the text of it so we don't have click on sites with twenty zillion things going on. Do you really lack the ability to say what you think that you can't even post a little bit of what the article in question is about? I'm not saying that as a personal attack, but if you ever expect to convince anyone of your viewpoint then we need to hear it from you and not some partisan link. It's really gotten to the point where most people here don't even take your links seriously, if you're really passionate about what you believe then tell us yourself.

(I know, I'm probably wasting my time but come on already.)

[w2amr]

YAWN, if you're going to post a link at least include some of the text of it so we don't have click on sites with twenty zillion things going on. Do you really lack the ability to say what you think that you can't even post a little bit of what the article in question is about? I'm not saying that as a personal attack, but if you ever expect to convince anyone of your viewpoint then we need to hear it from you and not some partisan link. It's really gotten to the point where most people here don't even take your links seriously, if you're really passionate about what you believe then tell us yourself.

(I know, I'm probably wasting my time but come on already.)
Funny, ain't he? :D

[K3XR]

Two DEM news networks in merger talks.

http://newsbusters.org/node/20386/print

[w2amr]

Was that the chapter where she talks about how erotic it is for her lovers to massage her Adam's Apple?
Doesn't the bag on her head get in the way?

[w2amr]

http://mysite.verizon.net/ad4mg/poo-pen.jpg
..............................
http://media4.dropshots.com/photos/88780/20080410/014923.jpg

[K3XR]

Thank you Newsbusters....

http://newsbusters.org/node/20419/print

[KB9YCO]

Thank you Newsbusters....

Thanks for nothing! (Heheh, tit for tat link bot...)

NewsBusted: A History of Bias and Misreporting (http://search.freefind.com/find.html?id=4669786&pageid=r&mode=ALL&n=0&_charset_=&bcd=%C3%B7&query=NewsBusters)

[w2amr]

Thanks for nothing! (Heheh, tit for tat link bot...)

NewsBusted: A History of Bias and Misreporting (http://search.freefind.com/find.html?id=4669786&pageid=r&mode=ALL&n=0&_charset_=&bcd=%C3%B7&query=NewsBusters)

"And therein lies a problem. Some of NewsBusters' contributors are so eager to smear that distortions and outright falsehoods make their way in -- which is surprising since you'd think that the MRC would want to enforce some sort of standard of accuracy on its contributors."

Thank you Brett, very interesting reading.

[OD5TX]

"Occupation" may the liberal/socialist term, but true patriots like myself and the citizen of Iraq have a more accurate term. We call it:

LIBERATION

:cool:

This is what the citizens of Iraq have to say :

http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=123&art_id=nw20080409144937482C969278

Self-explanatory !

It still amazes that people are for the war and occupation of Iraq , one of the worst fiascos in history.
They still believe what they had been told eventhough the lies have been unearthed and exposed in public!
No weapons of mass destruction and no link whatsoever between Saddam and the thugs of Al Qaida ( Pentagon story - link below ).

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gMrbOB26rqC1rDocYemjluC58zaA

OD5TX Michel

[N9XR]

This is what the citizens of Iraq have to say :

http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=123&art_id=nw20080409144937482C969278

Self-explanatory !

It still amazes that people are for the war and occupation of Iraq , one of the worst fiascos in history.
They still believe what they had been told eventhough the lies have been unearthed and exposed in public!
No weapons of mass destruction and no link whatsoever between Saddam and the thugs of Al Qaida ( Pentagon story - link below ).

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gMrbOB26rqC1rDocYemjluC58zaA

OD5TX Michel

Many people in this country like to be lied to and many enjoy hoaxes to be played on them.

They reply:
Who knew?
Who could have known?
When God handed out brains, we thought he said Blames and we said we didn't want any.


They are truly works.

[N4VGB]

They still believe what they had been told eventhough the lies have been unearthed and exposed in public!
OD5TX Michel


Since when do large rockets and the manufacturing capabilities to produce large quantities of poisonous gas not fall into the category of WMD? Since when do the capabilities to manufacture biological weapons and the proven finding of substances like anthrax in Iraq not fall into the category of WMD? Why would we suspect Iraq on nuclear components with only the satellite video of IAEA inspectors being held at the front gates of suspect facilities while trucks hastily leave via the back gates of the same facilities? Granted no large stockpiles of these weapons was found other than the rockets for delivery.

The responsibility for the existence of the Baath Party and Sadaam Hussein as it's leader was indeed from actions taken by John F. Kennedy while President of the U.S. His rule in Iraq and history of war & invasion of neighboring states was clear, his mehtods of ruling in Iraq and the atrocities he committed were clear. Also do not forget that the invasion of Iraq by U.S. forces could have easily been averted by the offer of Bush to allow Hussein and his family to leave Iraq. Most seem to have forgotten this fact completely!? The invasion was a small matter and the routing of the Baathists was accomplished with comparative ease in the scope of overall warfare involved.

The current fighting in Iraq is only the result of internal forces attempting to grab power and external forces like al Qaeda & Hezbollah. The war at this point is a civil war. There are also far more foreign fighters involved than just U.S. forces, surrounding states provide many insurgents in Iraq.

A quick withdrawal of U.S. forces would result in even more fighting. The bulk of the Iraqi population only wish for peace and a normal life, few can argue this point. There seems no easy road to U.S. withdrawal from Iraq.

[w2amr]

This is what the citizens of Iraq have to say :

http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=123&art_id=nw20080409144937482C969278

Self-explanatory !

It still amazes that people are for the war and occupation of Iraq , one of the worst fiascos in history.
They still believe what they had been told eventhough the lies have been unearthed and exposed in public!
No weapons of mass destruction and no link whatsoever between Saddam and the thugs of Al Qaida ( Pentagon story - link below ).

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gMrbOB26rqC1rDocYemjluC58zaA

OD5TX Michel
Neo nuts listen to folks like rush , rupert's crew, and mann coulter ,then repeat everything their masters have told them.
Polly want a cracker? Oh No, not that kind? :D

[n4sva]

Yeah, we should get our info from a George Soros funded blogophere posting like the Huffington Report, Commondreams, Media Bladders, etc.--- much more reliable <snicker>

[w2amr]

Yeah, we should get our info from a George Soros funded blogophere posting like the Huffington Report, Commondreams, Media Bladders, etc.--- much more reliable <snicker>
Who reads that crap? :confused:

[N4VGB]

Who reads that crap? :confused:

I much prefer the perusal of all and the drawing of my own conclusions.

[w2amr]

The current fighting in Iraq is only the result of internal forces attempting to grab power and external forces like al Qaeda & Hezbollah. .
No, the fighting is the result of a half witted moron being elected president.

[N4VGB]

No, the fighting is the result of a half witted moron being elected president.

That's an amazing statement! I would suppose it also explains the rampant use of terror tactics in nations not affiliated with the U.S.?

[ad4mg]

That's an amazing statement! I would suppose it also explains the rampant use of terror tactics in nations not affiliated with the U.S.?

Diversion - one of the 3-D's.

[N4VGB]

Diversion - one of the 3-D's.

I see you also lack any logical statement. :p

[ad4mg]

I see you also lack any logical statement. :p

Well, your statement offered such a huge disconnect with reality, that no logical reply was possible.

Perhaps this is why you are considered merely a very mediocre entertainer around here ... or so I've read. :cool:

[n2ize]

Yes, it happens on a daily basis with the LIB media.

http://newsbusters.org/node/19688/print

Sad, that's what happens when you let commie corporate interests run the media.

[N4VGB]

Well, your statement offered such a huge disconnect with reality, that no logical reply was possible.

Perhaps this is why you are considered merely a very mediocre entertainer around here ... or so I've read. :cool:


AH, I see. In that case, I pray that I stay disconnected from reality and also that every written word read does not automatically become my mantra in life. :p

Both cases were generally considered proof of a simple mind formerly. :)

[K3XR]

Dan (phoney Bush documents) Rather, not doing very well in court.

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/10/breaking-judge-dismisses-most-of-dan-rathers-lawsuit-against-cbs-over-rathergate/?print=1

[KB9YCO]

http://www.webpan.com/dsinclair/liberal-media.jpg

[N4VGB]

Funny stuff, you're on a roll today!:D:D:D

[K3XR]

LIB media types,.....if only we could return to the good ole days of just 3 or 4 networks.

http://newsbusters.org/node/20495/print

[K3XR]

Does it get much better??

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/17/video-left-suddenly-decides-stephanopoulos-is-unacceptably-partisan/?print=1

[K3XR]

What was that??

http://newsbusters.org/node/20632/print

[K3XR]

Hard to believe NBC could go even more LEFT.

http://newsbusters.org/node/20804/print

[w2amr]

http://www.webpan.com/dsinclair/liberal-media.jpg
I love it ! :D:D

[KB9YCO]

I love it ! :D:D
I can't take credit for it, but it was just too funny not to repeat here!

[w2amr]

I can't take credit for it, but it was just too funny not to repeat here!
You got that right.

[K3XR]

"Stupid reporter tricks"

http://newsbusters.org/node/20808/print

[N4VGB]

You got that right.

You should be ashamed! Even though we have such a wide assortment of news available to us, they're all liars! Revealed to us by the kindness of KV1M. :D:D:D

[KB9YCO]

You should be ashamed! Even though we have such a wide assortment of news available to us, they're all liars! Revealed to us by the kindness of KV1M. :D:D:D

I think that may true, to a point, but this nonsense that the media is overwhelmingly 'liberal' has no basis in fact and has yet to be proven. It's actually been unproven quite a number of times.
Personally, I think the media are all a bunch of windsocks, swinging with the prevailing breeze, whatever makes a splash pays.

[N4VGB]

I think that may true, to a point, but this nonsense that the media is overwhelmingly 'liberal' has no basis in fact and has yet to be proven. It's actually been unproven quite a number of times.
Personally, I think the media are all a bunch of windsocks, swinging with the prevailing breeze, whatever makes a splash pays.

It is part of the entertainment business now! Ratings, ratings, ratings! :D

Uber left or uber right, turn that dial and you'll find it all! :D

Watch them all, sort through the fluff and there's the truth! :D

[kv1m]

You should be ashamed! Even though we have such a wide assortment of news available to us, they're all liars! Revealed to us by the kindness of KV1M. :D:D:D

Oh no, I can't take credit for showing the lies of those clowns, they do that themselves every day.

I take credit for exposing you Jethro.

[N4VGB]

I take credit for exposing you Jethro.


Kissy kissy sweetheart. :eek:

[K3XR]

LIB media, how can that be?

http://newsbusters.org/node/20944/print

[K3XR]

Now there you go again.....

http://newsbusters.org/node/21022/print

[K3XR]

LIB media lies don't go away.

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/09/newsweeks-lie-about-koran-flushing-at-gitmo-continues-to-bear-fruit/?print=1

[K3XR]

Sorry Mort, you got caught.

http://newsbusters.org/node/21112/print

[K3XR]

News at 11:00, don't think so.

http://newsbusters.org/node/21158/print

[N4VGB]

News at 11:00, don't think so.

http://newsbusters.org/node/21158/print

How mean of Republicans, trying to deny welfare to illegal immigrants. :rolleyes:

[w2amr]

News at 11:00, don't think so.

http://newsbusters.org/node/21158/print

http://www.doocleanup.com/images/doocleanup.jpg

[K3XR]

Sure....they will report it.

http://newsbusters.org/node/21171/print

[W4HAY]

In the last presidential election, leftist special-interest groups and socialist billionaires like George Soros waged war with an unprecedented tsunami of negative TV attacks on the Republican incumbent, suggesting that he was a draft dodger who knowingly lied us into war...

...A truly fair and balanced media might foresee a really tough election contest — on both sides. But instead, we have a partisan chorus, whining in four-part harmony. They're not waiting for Hillary Clinton to discover her Titanic has sunk. They are getting their general-election assault on the "Republican attack machine" under way...

...But it would be crazy for anyone trying to paint himself as a straight shooter to discuss political negativity and ignore so shamelessly the ferocious forces on the left.

If Only Media Saw The Bias In The Mirror (http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=295661285184825)

[K3XR]

LIB media up to their old tricks, race and the elections.

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/backlash-against-media-smears-in-the-heartland/?print=1

[K3XR]

What else would you expect from the LIB media.


http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/white-house-takes-swipe-at-nbc-news-2008-05-19.html

http://newsbusters.org/node/21351/print

[K3XR]

The Commie News Network can't bring itself to use the word terrorist.

http://newsbusters.org/node/21372/print

[NL7W]

The Clinton campaign has said before that Fox treats them more fairly than MSNBC, but prominent surrogate Governor Ed Rendell heaped the strongest praise yet on the Murdoch-owned network.

"I think during this entire primary coverage, starting in Iowa and up to the present -- FOX has done the fairest job, and remained the most objective of all the cable networks. You hate both of our candidates. No, I’m only kidding. But you actually have done a very balanced job of reporting the news, and some of the other stations are just caught up with Senator Obama, who is a great guy, but Senator Obama can do no wrong, and Senator Clinton can do no right.” :eek:

Ref: http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0308/Gov_Rendell_Fox_is_most_objective_cable_network.ht ml

[N4VGB]

"But you actually have done a very balanced job of reporting the news, and some of the other stations are just caught up with Senator Obama, who is a great guy, but Senator Obama can do no wrong, and Senator Clinton can do no right.” :eek:


Looks like the same type love affair the press had with Bill Clinton. ;)

That one worked out well, now didn't it! :)

[K3XR]

The DEM propaganda machine, blame the Republicans.

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/21/new-hillary-argument-obamas-red-state-strength-will-be-nullified-by-crooked-gop-officials-anyway/

[K3XR]

More LIB media "myth".

http://newsbusters.org/node/21399/print

[K3XR]

And the LIB media "myth" continues.

http://newsbusters.org/node/21413/print

[K3XR]

The LIB media covers for Barry.

http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/05/the_press_obama_and_wright.html

[w2amr]

Welcome to the Memorial weekend linkathon.

[K3XR]

LIB media controling the news, instead of just reporting it.

http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=203F9A7D-3048-5C12-00F893045DC51923

[K3XR]

As if we needed proof.

http://newsbusters.org/node/21508/print

[W4DFW]

Welcome to the Memorial weekend linkathon.

Obviously you don't care to read the links as they don't support your ideas, thus your need to make fun of he who posts them.

Very Lib'rul of you. And here I thought you left wingers were all about "acceptance" and "understanding." I must have been wrong . . . :rolleyes:

[W4DFW]

Oh, how could I forget to mention this!!! Our local St. Petersburg Times (otherwise known as Pravda South) ran a front page story on Hulk Hogan's daughter being in a fender-bender accident. WOW!! Now THAT is news!!

Buried deep in the paper was a small article about how the Iraqi army has pretty much chased Al Qaeda out of an area that used to bristle with them and how Al Qaeda is nearly defeated in Iraq.

So much for the news being "reported" by the Lib'rul media!! :rolleyes:

[N4VGB]

Very Lib'rul of you. And here I thought you left wingers were all about "acceptance" and "understanding." I must have been wrong . . . :rolleyes:


You were wrong, because they're not liberals at all, they're left wingers, big difference. Quit honoring them and slandering liberalism. :)

[W4DFW]

You were wrong, because they're not liberals at all, they're left wingers, big difference. Quit honoring them and slandering liberalism. :)


MY bad!! So Sorry!! :D

[K3XR]

LIB media never misses a chance.

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/05/27/bds-alert-nyt-and-huffpo-get-totally-unhinged/?print=1

[w2amr]

Obviously you don't care to read the links as they don't support your ideas, thus your need to make fun of he who posts them.

Very Lib'rul of you. And here I thought you left wingers were all about "acceptance" and "understanding." I must have been wrong . . . :rolleyes:
Not true. I accept and understand that You, Danno, and Jethro are all right wing nut cases.

[w2amr]

Oh, how could I forget to mention this!!! Our local St. Petersburg Times (otherwise known as Pravda South) ran a front page story on Hulk Hogan's daughter being in a fender-bender accident. WOW!! Now THAT is news!!

Buried deep in the paper was a small article about how the Iraqi army has pretty much chased Al Qaeda out of an area that used to bristle with them and how Al Qaeda is nearly defeated in Iraq.

So much for the news being "reported" by the Lib'rul media!! :rolleyes:
I love it. You defend a guy whose posts are hopelessly biased and totally devoid of any objectivity, then you whine about the liberal media. You really should consider seeking help.
67 links posted in this thread alone, Maybe you should take him with you.

[W4DFW]

Not true. I accept and understand that You, Danno, and Jethro are all right wing nut cases.

Gosh, it would seem to me if someone posts something that is so nutty, it wouldn't be too hard for you to refute it. But rather than refute the points, you resort to name calling.

Maybe someone likes to post links. So be it. You're typical response is devoid of any substance to counter the point, only to belittle it. Personally, I get tired of reading that over and over. You seem like such a bright guy that I wonder why you don't spend more energy proving us wrong

Shucks, could it be you can't?? Naw . . . COULDN'T be!!??!!?? ;)

[w2amr]

Gosh, it would seem to me if someone posts something that is so nutty, it wouldn't be too hard for you to refute it. But rather than refute the points, you resort to name calling.

Maybe someone likes to post links. So be it. You're typical response is devoid of any substance to counter the point, only to belittle it. Personally, I get tired of reading that over and over. You seem like such a bright guy that I wonder why you don't spend more energy proving us wrong

Shucks, could it be you can't?? Naw . . . COULDN'T be!!??!!?? ;)

If I tried to refute every goof ball article that danno posted a link for, I wouldn't have time to do anything else.
"proving us wrong"
Us? You said it, I didn't .

[K3XR]

Let's wait and see....

http://newsbusters.org/node/21529/print

[K3XR]

Who don't know that??

http://newsbusters.org/node/21588/print

[N4VGB]

If I tried to refute every goof ball article that danno posted a link for, I wouldn't have time to do anything else.
"proving us wrong"
Us? You said it, I didn't .

Could be the reason you lefties get little respect, no substance??? :p

[W4DFW]

If I tried to refute every goof ball article that danno posted a link for, I wouldn't have time to do anything else.
"proving us wrong"
Us? You said it, I didn't .

US . . . as in those of us with more than 4 brain cells hittin' on all cylinders at once.

I tell 'ya what. Let's make it REAL simple.

Define the English word, "Lie." The word is the same one used here, as "did you tell a lie just then?"

This issue comes up fairly frequently lately as Lib'rul Lunes try to redefine that word, so I thought I'd give you ample opportunity to take the bull by the horns and show us what you're made of.

Have at it, big boy!! I *know* you're gonna make me proud!

[N9XR]

US . . . as in those of us with more than 4 brain cells hittin' on all cylinders at once.

I tell 'ya what. Let's make it REAL simple.

Define the English word, "Lie." The word is the same one used here, as "did you tell a lie just then?"

This issue comes up fairly frequently lately as Lib'rul Lunes try to redefine that word, so I thought I'd give you ample opportunity to take the bull by the horns and show us what you're made of.

Have at it, big boy!! I *know* you're gonna make me proud!

Darned Funny Wepubwicin.

[N4VGB]

Darned Funny Wepubwicin.

I thought you were going to stay mad and checkin on the island permanently? :rolleyes:

Slow and boring over there ain't it!? :)

[N9XR]

I thought you were going to stay mad and checkin on the island permanently? :rolleyes:

Slow and boring over there ain't it!? :)

Urine denial.

You were wrong. We were right.

You were duped and there's no denying it now.

Who's mad? I'm not mad. 'Specially just because you have made a fool of yourself.

You are not in denial anymore now are you since you have the truth from the highest authority on the truth?

[N4VGB]

You are not in denial anymore now are you since you have the truth from the highest authority on the truth?


Would that be you or Scottie? :rolleyes:

[N9XR]

Would that be you or Scottie? :rolleyes:

Are you saying we can't believe anything from Dubya's inner circle?

[N4VGB]

Are you saying we can't believe anything from Dubya's inner circle?

"highest authority on truth", you or Scottie? Drunk again? :p

[w2amr]

Are you saying we can't believe anything from Dubya's inner circle?
Don't you mean Ex inner circle? Most of the rats have jumped ship.

[K3XR]

LIB media friends of Barry....

http://newsbusters.org/node/21601/print

[N4VGB]

Don't you mean Ex inner circle? Most of the rats have jumped ship.

At least they don't commit suicide, common affliction of Clinton associates. :p

[K3XR]

LIB media cleaning up the news for LIBS, again.

http://newsbusters.org/node/21621/print

[kv1m]

At least they don't commit suicide, common affliction of Clinton associates. :p

No, they just get guilty consciences and start telling the truth.:rolleyes:

[N4VGB]

No, they just get guilty consciences and start telling the truth.:rolleyes:

I haven't read the book but just by the NPR interview, I doubt the book is the Bush blowout that some believe it to be. More like good publisher hype to boost sales!? :rolleyes:

I've got no problem at all with a Bush man picking the left wing suckers pockets! :D

[kv1m]

I haven't read the book but just by the NPR interview, I doubt the book is the Bush blowout that some believe it to be. More like good publisher hype to boost sales!? :rolleyes:

I've got no problem at all with a Bush man picking the left wing suckers pockets! :D

Me either, but it's not sounding like the last one this time.
The interviews with Olbermann put that idea to rest.

[n2ize]

Darned Funny Wepubwicin.

I just call it... dum dum de dum dum duum dum...Dumb... Always room for stupid.
:eek::D

[N4VGB]

I just call it... dum dum de dum dum duum dum...Dumb... Always room for stupid.
:eek::D

Almost but quite as dumb as yelping about a soldier being electrocuted in Iraq and ignoring all the Con Ed electrocutions in NYC? How about all those crane and scaffold collapses in NYC? No investigation needed there? :D:D:D

[K3XR]

Your NPR tax dollars at work.

http://newsbusters.org/node/21639/print

[K3XR]

LIB media gone wild??

http://newsbusters.org/node/21640/print

[K3XR]

LIB media not even trying to hide it.....

http://newsbusters.org/node/21717/print

[K3XR]

News, ....what the LIB nets say it is.....

http://newsbusters.org/node/21757/print

[k4kyv]

We've had the spectacle of Barack Obama embarrassed by the comments of his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Last week, Obama resigned his membership in the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, after Wright praised the Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, and repeated the looney conspiracy theory that the US government bio-engineered the AIDS virus to cleanse the country of African Americans.

John McCain finally had to reject the endorsement of right-wing Texas evangelist John Hagee. Months ago, they had appeared at a grinning photo op where McCain accepted Hagee's blessing. It was already known that amongst other outrageous statements, Hagee had said New Orleans "invited God's wrath" and deserved Hurricane Katrina. The last straw fell when an audiotape surfaced of Hagee saying God sent Adolph Hitler to help Jews reach the promised land.

But McCain's problem with preachers has been much less publicised than Obama's. I wonder why? You'd think the despised "liberal media" would be trumpeting McCain's woes in every broadcast, instead of piling on Obama.

That's because the "liberal media" are not only despised but non-existent.

[w2amr]

We've had the spectacle of Barack Obama embarrassed by the comments of his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Last week, Obama resigned his membership in the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, after Wright praised the Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, and repeated the looney conspiracy theory that the US government bio-engineered the AIDS virus to cleanse the country of African Americans.

John McCain finally had to reject the endorsement of right-wing Texas evangelist John Hagee. Months ago, they had appeared at a grinning photo op where McCain accepted Hagee's blessing. It was already known that amongst other outrageous statements, Hagee had said New Orleans "invited God's wrath" and deserved Hurricane Katrina. The last straw fell when an audiotape surfaced of Hagee saying God sent Adolph Hitler to help Jews reach the promised land.

But McCain's problem with preachers has been much less publicised than Obama's. I wonder why? You'd think the despised "liberal media" would be trumpeting McCain's woes in every broadcast, instead of piling on Obama.

That's because the "liberal media" are not only despised but non-existent.
Excellent Don.

[w2amr]

News, ....what the LIB nets say it is.....

http://newsbusters.org/node/21757/print
Going, and going, and going................
http://media3.dropshots.com/photos/88780/20080606/012540.jpg

[NL7W]

We've had the spectacle of Barack Obama embarrassed by the comments of his former pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Last week, Obama resigned his membership in the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, after Wright praised the Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, and repeated the looney conspiracy theory that the US government bio-engineered the AIDS virus to cleanse the country of African Americans.

John McCain finally had to reject the endorsement of right-wing Texas evangelist John Hagee. Months ago, they had appeared at a grinning photo op where McCain accepted Hagee's blessing. It was already known that amongst other outrageous statements, Hagee had said New Orleans "invited God's wrath" and deserved Hurricane Katrina. The last straw fell when an audiotape surfaced of Hagee saying God sent Adolph Hitler to help Jews reach the promised land.

But McCain's problem with preachers has been much less publicised than Obama's. I wonder why? You'd think the despised "liberal media" would be trumpeting McCain's woes in every broadcast, instead of piling on Obama.

That's because the "liberal media" are not only despised but non-existent.

Could it be because McCain wasn't a member of Hagy's church, nor did he attend for 20 years, or collaborate or attribute a recent autobiographical book title (The Audicity of Hope) to his Pastor? Could it be that Hagy wasn't McCain's close spiritual advisor, friend, and the pastor that baptized all his children (unlike Barrry O)?

Golly, I wonder why Obama isn't getin' it... the liberal media would never investigate this mess, or that of Pflager... it would hurt their candidate! If they did, it would be much after-the-fact, superficial, and buried (as presented by the MSM to-date). Why would they wish to expose their lefty-looney candidate's radicalism -- through his radical left personal and political associations? I really wonder why?

You are indescribably dense, if you believe the MSM is fair and balanced. Read the following poll regarding this subject to find you're apart of a very small minority. Reference: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/voters_give_media_failing_grades_in_objectivity_fo r_election_2008


Good try, kyv. But, you came up really short. The facts are killin' ya.

[NL7W]

Voters Give Media Failing Grades in Objectivity for Election 2008

Sunday, June 08, 2008

Just 17% of voters nationwide believe that most reporters try to offer unbiased coverage of election campaigns. A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that four times as many—68%--believe most reporters try to help the candidate that they want to win.

The perception that reporters are advocates rather than observers is held by 82% of Republicans, 56% of Democrats, and 69% of voters not affiliated with either major party. The skepticism about reporters cuts across income, racial, gender, and age barriers.

Ideologically, political liberals give the least pessimistic assessment of reporters, but even 50% of those on the political left see bias. Thirty-three percent (33%) of liberals believe most reporters try to be objective. Moderates, by a 65% to 17% margin, see reporters as advocates, not scribes. Among political conservatives, only 7% see reporters as objective while 83% believe they are biased.

Given these results, it’s not surprising that 76% of voters believe the media has too much power and influence over elections. Just 3% believe the Fourth Estate has too little influence while 16% say the balance is about right.

Eighty-seven percent (87%) of Republicans believe the media has too much influence along with 80% of unaffiliated voters and 65% of Democrats.

Voters have little doubt as to who is benefitting from the media coverage this year—Barack Obama. Fifty-four percent (54%) say Obama has gotten the best coverage so far. Twenty-two percent (22%) say McCain has received the most favorable coverage while 14% say that Hillary got the best treatment.

At the other extreme, 43% say Clinton received the worst treatment from the media. Twenty-seven percent (27%) say the media was roughest on McCain and only 15% thought the media coverage was most unfair to Obama.

For more, reference: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ..._election_2008

[K3XR]

Who don't know that??

http://newsbusters.org/node/21818/print

[K3XR]

Did you say LIB media??

http://newsbusters.org/node/21833/print

[K3XR]

The main stream media keeps moving LEFT.

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/print/media-reform-targets-conservatives/

[k4kyv]

Could it be because McCain wasn't a member of Hagy's church, nor did he attend for 20 years, or collaborate or attribute a recent autobiographical book title (The Audicity of Hope) to his Pastor? Could it be that Hagy wasn't McCain's close spiritual advisor, friend, and the pastor that baptized all his children (unlike Barrry O)?

Golly, I wonder why Obama isn't getin' it... the liberal media would never investigate this mess, or that of Pflager... it would hurt their candidate! If they did, it would be much after-the-fact, superficial, and buried (as presented by the MSM to-date). Why would they wish to expose their lefty-looney candidate's radicalism -- through his radical left personal and political associations? I really wonder why?

You are indescribably dense, if you believe the MSM is fair and balanced. Read the following poll regarding this subject to find you're apart of a very small minority. Reference: http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/voters_give_media_failing_grades_in_objectivity_fo r_election_2008


Good try, kyv. But, you came up really short. The facts are killin' ya.

Then why did the "liberal media" totally ignore the Downing Street Memo until their hand was forced because the news stories from Europe finally began to grab attention on this side of the Atlantic, largely thanks to the internet? And it still gained minimal attention on network TV. The "liberal media" could have had a heyday with that one.

[N4VGB]

Then why did the "liberal media" totally ignore the Downing Street Memo until their hand was forced because the news stories from Europe finally began to grab attention on this side of the Atlantic, largely thanks to the internet? And it still gained minimal attention on network TV. The "liberal media" could have had a heyday with that one.

Maybe because it contains no verifiable information? No direct quotes attributal to Mr. Bush with a verifiable name as the source? Revelations like those that can be garnered from The National Enquirer? Perhaps U.S. news agencies who are generally bound by a far higher set of standards than those required in England could not verify any of the information in a proper way?

Go figger? :rolleyes:

[k4kyv]

Perhaps U.S. news agencies who are generally bound by a far higher set of standards than those required in England could not verify any of the information in a proper way?

So you are saying the despised "liberal media" follows high standards?

[N4VGB]

So you are saying the despised "liberal media" follows high standards?

The media in the U.S. is bound by higher standards than those in Europe. If or when legal issues might arise from a story, ya better have something to show 'em. In matters like this one, ya better have a lot to show 'em. ;)

It is perfectly legal here to put your own spin on any story. But ya better not change any verifiable facts and report it. :) That gets ugly fast! :eek:

[K3XR]

Going after Joe......
http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=NjZjZmI1ODdiN2JjZjE4Y2IxMWEyZjViYjIyYTM1ODU=

[K3XR]

We know Bob...
http://newsbusters.org/node/21882/print

[K3XR]

Here they go, again...

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=66832

[K3XR]

Could you loan me a DEM??

http://newsbusters.org/node/21939/print

[n2ize]

http://www.dwrobertson-photography.com/Images/gal_Glasgow_big_snore.jpg

[N4VGB]

N2NH has become the resident "toonbot".

N2IZE now becomes the resident "picbot".

[K3XR]

Just the facts, please....

http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB121312349473561357.html

[K3XR]

AP in the tank for Barry O on taxes....

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/ap-pretends-leftwing-tax-report-is-non-partisan/print

[K3XR]

In the land of cesspool politics, where's the press??

http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=YjE4OWQ2NDIyNTkzYjg2YThlNjU1YmNjMWFjNzk3YjY=

[K3XR]

LIB media, fair and balanced....

http://newsbusters.org/node/22072/print

[w2amr]

http://www.dwrobertson-photography.com/Images/gal_Glasgow_big_snore.jpg
That pretty much sums it up John.
:D:D

[K3XR]

LIB media can't find the 'D'.....

http://newsbusters.org/node/22174/print

[wa8rti]

Wow-sounds like a serious oversight on the part of the Sun that should be investigated. :rolleyes: On the other hand, perhaps they think the readers are smart enought to know the party affiliation of local politicians. The local papers here seldom give the party of local politicians for that reason. Nice try to prove that the media is really liberal, but you'll have to come up with something better.Weak attempt at best. :p

[w2amr]

View Post 06-16-2008, 01:27 AM
Remove user from ignore listK3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.

View Post 06-17-2008, 04:40 PM
Remove user from ignore listK3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.

View Post 06-19-2008, 12:05 PM
Remove user from ignore listK3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.

View Post 06-19-2008, 10:56 PM
Remove user from ignore listK3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.

#209 06-19-2008, 11:07 PM

Ahhhhhhhh. :D

[n2nh]

View Post 06-16-2008, 01:27 AM
Remove user from ignore listK3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.

View Post 06-17-2008, 04:40 PM
Remove user from ignore listK3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.

View Post 06-19-2008, 12:05 PM
Remove user from ignore listK3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.

View Post 06-19-2008, 10:56 PM
Remove user from ignore listK3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.

#209 06-19-2008, 11:07 PM

Ahhhhhhhh. :D

N4VGB
This message is hidden because N4VGB is on your ignore list.
View Post Old 06-15-2008, 09:27 PM
Remove user from ignore list

K3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.
View Post Old 06-17-2008, 12:40 PM
Remove user from ignore list

K3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.
View Post Old 06-19-2008, 08:05 AM
Remove user from ignore list

K3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.
View Post Old 06-19-2008, 06:56 PM
Remove user from ignore list

That looks awfully familiar! But with one important diffference...
;):D

[N4VGB]

#209 06-19-2008, 11:07 PM
Ahhhhhhhh. :D


Hmmm, you can't take the heat so you bail out of the kitchen! I thought you were a battleship? :D:p

[N4VGB]

That looks awfully familiar! But with one important diffference...


Now that's funny, John & George form their own cowards group!!! RTFLMAO!!! :D:D:D:p:p:p

[w2amr]

N4VGB
This message is hidden because N4VGB is on your ignore list.
View Post Old 06-15-2008, 09:27 PM
Remove user from ignore list

K3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.
View Post Old 06-17-2008, 12:40 PM
Remove user from ignore list

K3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.
View Post Old 06-19-2008, 08:05 AM
Remove user from ignore list

K3XR
This message is hidden because K3XR is on your ignore list.
View Post Old 06-19-2008, 06:56 PM
Remove user from ignore list

That looks awfully familiar! But with one important diffference...
;):D

Good job John. We may be starting a trend. :D

[w2amr]

Hmmm, you can't take the heat so you bail out of the kitchen! I thought you were a battleship? :D:p
WTF are you taking about?

[N4VGB]

WTF are you taking about?

I don't have an ignore list, I fear none. ;):)

[w2amr]

I don't have an ignore list, I fear none. ;):)
It has nothing to do with fear genius. I'm just sick of looking at those stupid links posted day after day.

[N4VGB]

It has nothing to do with fear genius. I'm just sick of looking at those stupid links posted day after day.

Some yes and some no. :)

[w2amr]

Some yes and some no. :)

Enjoy
......

[n2nh]

It has nothing to do with fear genius. I'm just sick of looking at those stupid links posted day after day.

Funny, I came to the same conclusion and added a missing link to the list.
;):D

[N4VGB]

Funny, I came to the same conclusion and added a missing link to the list.
;):D

You put yourself on your ignore list!!! :eek::eek::eek:

[w2amr]

You put yourself on your ignore list!!! :eek::eek::eek:
No sense responding, he can't see it.

[N4VGB]

No sense responding, he can't see it.

GOOD! I can swing away with the whip with impunity! :)

[w2amr]

GOOD! I can swing away with the whip with impunity! :)
Not quite, I'm going to rat on you. :p

[K3XR]

Why, it could only be a myth....

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/06/29/google-shuts-down-anti-obama-sites-its-blogger-platform

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2008/06/29/rolling-stone-publisher-admits-hes-obama-campaign-donor

[K3XR]

Good news on the LIB media front.

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080629/newspapers_cutbacks.html?.v=3&printer=1

[K3XR]

The traitor Times, and others......

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=27263

[K3XR]

Brokaw, the LIB, on Meet The Press....

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2008/07/01/brokaw-brings-strong-liberal-tilt-meet-press

[kv1m]

GOOD! I can swing away with the whip with impunity! :)

Well that's pretty whimpy.

[N4VGB]

Well that's pretty whimpy.

NO, using the ignore list option is the action of a wimp. ;):)

[w2amr]

NO, using the ignore list option is the action of a wimp. ;):)
You can call me what ever you like, but I don't have to look at any more stupid blog links.

[N4VGB]

You can call me what ever you like, but I