So, What Makes Kristol Right to Be a TIMES Op-Ed?

[n2nh]

Was this guy the Fifth Bush? Kristol sure seems to be there when the smoking gun is found.
Maybe they ARE the NY Slimes hiring a jerk like Clueless Bill.
Where's that skank Coulter when you need her?

http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/4061/kristolkr2.jpg

[NL7W]

Why aren't YOU writing an op-ed column? What gives? http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/cool.gif

[n2nh]

Ah, nice to see another Frozen Steve intelligent reply to the fact at hand. Can it be long before the standard Frozen Steve name-calling starts?

HAW!

[NL7W]

Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Jan. 13 2008,02:28)]Ah, nice to see another Frozen Steve intelligent reply to the fact at hand. Can it be long before the standard Frozen Steve name-calling starts?

HAW!
Sticks and stones...

Have a wonderful day, OM.

[n2nh]

Must be, you and KIX sure jumped on these two. Why is it that Neocons are all upset when something truthful comes out? Oh, yes, reality has a Liberal Bias. With all the crying you'd think Mark Foley was trying to give a prostate exam.

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

[KB1KIX]

Upset?

You wish.

I find your need to post the topic hilarious.

I'm actually entertained by the whole thing.

A conservative at the slimes - they need a little more truth.

Jonathan

[n2nh]

So, based on all the above written by Bill Kristol, Fact Fabricator, you are maintaining that he writes the God's honest truth. I guess the Slimes are trying to steal readers from the National Enquirer.

Wow, that sounds like a latex allergy. As well as an unnatural aversion to truth. Knock yersef out, nobody is fooled by the pre-packaged propaganda that Kristol manufactures. Seems the Slimes needed to prove they could publish just as much manure as the Post. I wonder how well Bill the hack will fare when the readers, many who are professors in college and actually can b*tch slap him with facts, write in and critique his typical inane monkey runes?

[NL7W]

Quote[/b] (KB1KIX @ Jan. 13 2008,02:38)]Upset?

You wish.

I find your need to post the topic hilarious.

I'm actually entertained by the whole thing.

A conservative at the slimes - they need a little more truth.

Jonathan
Actually, it's all about MONEY... God forbid!

NYT's readership has declined precipitously for years, and they have to pay for their new bldg. Balanced Bill can add readership...

Logically, there's no other valid reason for this treason committed against the paper's liberal base.


73.

[n2nh]

Seems to me that Kristol is whoring himself in light of his recent tirades of insanity about the Times.

Quote[/b] ]Kristol: The New York Times ‘Should Be Prosecuted,’ ‘It Isn’t A First-Rate Newspaper’

Then again we're talking King of the Neocons. Anything for a buck, even if it means proving that you have no scruples what so ever.

Kristol and the Slimes (http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/29/kristol-v-nyt/)

[W3MIV]

Well, it's nice to see ol' "Troller-in-Motion" is back at the old stand hawking his usual brand of Nujork fertilizer.

Glad to see you are back to normal, John. HNY.

[n2nh]

Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 13 2008,06:55)]Well, it's nice to see ol' "Troller-in-Motion" is back at the old stand hawking his usual brand of Nujork fertilizer.

Glad to see you are back to normal, John. HNY.
Nice to see you too. So, the rabid right seems to foam at the mouth less since BS Kristol got his Op-Ed post. Comment? Or are you just disagreeing and saying I'm trolling because that's the depth of your insight on this, Albert?

It's a valid question. And if he isn't selling his soul to work at the center of the Liberal universe, then just what is he doing? Proving to Liberals that he's a total boob? We already know that.

[W3MIV]

Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Jan. 13 2008,08:08)]Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 13 2008,06:55)]Well, it's nice to see ol' "Troller-in-Motion" is back at the old stand hawking his usual brand of Nujork fertilizer.

Glad to see you are back to normal, John. HNY.
Nice to see you too. #So, the rabid right seems to foam at the mouth less since BS Kristol got his Op-Ed post. #Comment? #Or are you just disagreeing and saying I'm trolling because that's the depth of your insight on this, Albert?

It's a valid question. #And if he isn't selling his soul to work at the center of the Liberal universe, then just what is he doing? #Proving to Liberals that he's a total boob? #We already know that.
Sorry, John. No bite. I don't read the NYT, even on a good day. And I have no real interest in Kristol, though I don't find him offensive.

On the surface, I would guess that the NYT has added his column in order to give their editorial content a gloss of objectivity, and that he sees it as an opportunity to engage the diehards and, no less important, pick up the odd dollar or three along the way.

On the whole, Johnny, an underwhelming bit of news. But, then, I have come to expect that in your trolls.

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

[n2nh]

Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 13 2008,07:41)]Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Jan. 13 2008,08:08)]Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 13 2008,06:55)]Well, it's nice to see ol' "Troller-in-Motion" is back at the old stand hawking his usual brand of Nujork fertilizer.

Glad to see you are back to normal, John. HNY.
Nice to see you too. So, the rabid right seems to foam at the mouth less since BS Kristol got his Op-Ed post. Comment? Or are you just disagreeing and saying I'm trolling because that's the depth of your insight on this, Albert?

It's a valid question. And if he isn't selling his soul to work at the center of the Liberal universe, then just what is he doing? Proving to Liberals that he's a total boob? We already know that.
Sorry, John. No bite. I don't read the NYT, even on a good day. And I have no real interest in Kristol, though I don't find him offensive.

On the surface, I would guess that the NYT has added his column in order to give their editorial content a gloss of objectivity, and that he sees it as an opportunity to engage the diehards and, no less important, pick up the odd dollar or three along the way.

On the whole, Johnny, an underwhelming bit of news. But, then, I have come to expect that in your trolls.

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
I don't find him offensive either. OTOH, I do find him to be Bill O'Reilly 1.0. I seriously feel sorry for him. He's way out of his league at the Times. Pretty hard for anybody to take him seriously when he can't even get his fellow Neocons right. Sounds like Ronnie Reagan Disease.

I suppose this would look like a troll to someone who has nothing of import to say about it. Especially when the facts are there. I'll give you this Alberto, you don't look for wriggle room when there's none to be had.

[W3MIV]

You must admit, John, that it is quite difficult to state anything "of import" when there is nothing of importance in the post about which you solicit a comment.

An old adage holds that "no news is good news;" in this case, no news is just that: No news.

Despite your felicitous eagerness to post animadversions about Mr Kristol, the simple fact of the matter is that his opinions merit neither more nor less attention (not to even consider valuation) than do those of any other pundit on the NYT editorial pages. Not much to get excited about, even on a day when there is no other news -- not even a missing dog story.

If anything, John, your resort to such a thread is indicative of a need for withdrawal from the cartoons which govern your credal stances on political topics.

Put your Sunday NYT to better use: There are bound to be many fish swimming in the East River that would better be swaddled in those same editorial pages and discarded on the beaches of New Jersey than swallowed.

[kc7jty]

So, What Makes Kristol Right to Be a TIMES Op-Ed?
Perhaps connections in very high places?
http://baltimore.indymedia.org/usermedia/image/2/William_Kristol.jpg
America will consume anything as long as it's packaged correctly.

[n2nh]

Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 13 2008,08:53)]You must admit, John, that it is quite difficult to state anything "of import" when there is nothing of importance in the post about which you solicit a comment.

An old adage holds that "no news is good news;" in this case, no news is just that: No news.

Despite your felicitous eagerness to post animadversions about Mr Kristol, the simple fact of the matter is that his opinions merit neither more nor less attention (not to even consider valuation) than do those of any other pundit on the NYT editorial pages. Not much to get excited about, even on a day when there is no other news -- not even a missing dog story.

If anything, John, your resort to such a thread is indicative of a need for withdrawal from the cartoons which govern your credal stances on political topics.

Put your Sunday NYT to better use: There are bound to be many fish swimming in the East River that would better be swaddled in those same editorial pages and discarded on the beaches of New Jersey than swallowed.
I'll just make you a diaper. It's better than that mess you just posted Alberto. And I'll even put Bill's face right where it belongs. It'll be the first time manure will flow back to it's source.
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif

[K0RGR]

Kristol is the son of the acknowledged father of the neocon movement, and a major member of the Israel lobby.

[kc7jty]

Quote[/b] (K0RGR @ Jan. 13 2008,20:12)]Kristol is the son of the acknowledged father of the neocon movement, and a major member of the Israel lobby.
how much do you think that weighs with the numb skulls that watch him on Fox every week?

[W8EFA]

Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 13 2008,09:53)]You must admit, John, that it is quite difficult to state anything "of import" when there is nothing of importance in the post about which you solicit a comment.

An old adage holds that "no news is good news;" in this case, no news is just that: No news.

Despite your felicitous eagerness to post animadversions about Mr Kristol, the simple fact of the matter is that his opinions merit neither more nor less attention (not to even consider valuation) than do those of any other pundit on the NYT editorial pages. Not much to get excited about, even on a day when there is no other news -- not even a missing dog story.

If anything, John, your resort to such a thread is indicative of a need for withdrawal from the cartoons which govern your credal stances on political topics.

Put your Sunday NYT to better use: There are bound to be many fish swimming in the East River that would better be swaddled in those same editorial pages and discarded on the beaches of New Jersey than swallowed.
Quote[/b] ]felicitous eagerness to post animadversions

Bow Tie Albert has the thesaurus out again! #

Poor Albert, if he just had a College degree he wouldn't have to put on such a pathetic display of airs.

Words in prose ought to express the intended meaning; if they attract attention to themselves, it is a fault; in the very best styles you read page after page without noticing the medium.
Works of imagination should be written in very plain language; the more purely imaginative they are, the more necessary it is to be plain.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge

The finest language is mostly made up of simple unimposing words.
George Eliot

[kc7jty]

Quote[/b] (W8EFA @ Jan. 13 2008,23:05)]Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 13 2008,09:53)]You must admit, John, that it is quite difficult to state anything "of import" when there is nothing of importance in the post about which you solicit a comment.

An old adage holds that "no news is good news;" in this case, no news is just that: No news.

Despite your felicitous eagerness to post animadversions about Mr Kristol, the simple fact of the matter is that his opinions merit neither more nor less attention (not to even consider valuation) than do those of any other pundit on the NYT editorial pages. Not much to get excited about, even on a day when there is no other news -- not even a missing dog story.

If anything, John, your resort to such a thread is indicative of a need for withdrawal from the cartoons which govern your credal stances on political topics.

Put your Sunday NYT to better use: There are bound to be many fish swimming in the East River that would better be swaddled in those same editorial pages and discarded on the beaches of New Jersey than swallowed.
Quote[/b] ]felicitous eagerness to post animadversions

Bow Tie Albert has the thesaurus out again!

Poor Albert, if he just had a College degree he wouldn't have to put on such a pathetic display of airs.

Words in prose ought to express the intended meaning; if they attract attention to themselves, it is a fault; in the very best styles you read page after page without noticing the medium.
Works of imagination should be written in very plain language; the more purely imaginative they are, the more necessary it is to be plain.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge

The finest language is mostly made up of simple unimposing words.
George Eliot



al2i likes it though.

[kc7jty]

let us not forget another benevolent mental wizard expert, at the times, fully bona fied in the gracious bestowal of highly accurate wisdom and insight upon the moronic masses.
link-o (http://www.thomaslfriedman.com/)

[nx6d]

It's hard to take a guy who was Dan Quayle's chief of staff seriously.

But then again, he spouts the usual soundbites from the right wing noise machine to keep guys like Frozen Steve an "KIX are for TRIDS" happy.

[W3MIV]

Quote[/b] (W8EFA @ Jan. 14 2008,02:05)]Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 13 2008,09:53)]You must admit, John, that it is quite difficult to state anything "of import" when there is nothing of importance in the post about which you solicit a comment.

An old adage holds that "no news is good news;" in this case, no news is just that: No news.

Despite your felicitous eagerness to post animadversions about Mr Kristol, the simple fact of the matter is that his opinions merit neither more nor less attention (not to even consider valuation) than do those of any other pundit on the NYT editorial pages. Not much to get excited about, even on a day when there is no other news -- not even a missing dog story.

If anything, John, your resort to such a thread is indicative of a need for withdrawal from the cartoons which govern your credal stances on political topics.

Put your Sunday NYT to better use: There are bound to be many fish swimming in the East River that would better be swaddled in those same editorial pages and discarded on the beaches of New Jersey than swallowed.
Quote[/b] ]felicitous eagerness to post animadversions

Bow Tie Albert has the thesaurus out again! #

Poor Albert, if he just had a College degree he wouldn't have to put on such a pathetic display of airs.

Words in prose ought to express the intended meaning; if they attract attention to themselves, it is a fault; in the very best styles you read page after page without noticing the medium.
Works of imagination should be written in very plain language; the more purely imaginative they are, the more necessary it is to be plain.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge

The finest language is mostly made up of simple unimposing words.
George Eliot



Poor Willy Boy. Never any comment about the post, but always an ad hominem derision of the poster.

That, my dear Willy Boy, speaks far more eloquently about the paucity of your political philosophy (and I am being overly generous to so designate it, but I can be charitable), not to even mention the vacuousness of your thin intellectual poses, than any puerile comment about me.

I thrive on the mean comments of such small minds.

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

[wd0ct]

The fcc has opened the way for major market media to buy newspapers. It has been reported, I believe by wjs, that Rupert Murdoch considers the nyt to be a sitting duck for a buy out.

It Rupert buys it will it become the darling of neocons? Sure it will.

[nx6d]

Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 14 2008,07:11)]Quote[/b] (W8EFA @ Jan. 14 2008,02:05)]Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 13 2008,09:53)]You must admit, John, that it is quite difficult to state anything "of import" when there is nothing of importance in the post about which you solicit a comment.

An old adage holds that "no news is good news;" in this case, no news is just that: No news.

Despite your felicitous eagerness to post animadversions about Mr Kristol, the simple fact of the matter is that his opinions merit neither more nor less attention (not to even consider valuation) than do those of any other pundit on the NYT editorial pages. Not much to get excited about, even on a day when there is no other news -- not even a missing dog story.

If anything, John, your resort to such a thread is indicative of a need for withdrawal from the cartoons which govern your credal stances on political topics.

Put your Sunday NYT to better use: There are bound to be many fish swimming in the East River that would better be swaddled in those same editorial pages and discarded on the beaches of New Jersey than swallowed.
Quote[/b] ]felicitous eagerness to post animadversions

Bow Tie Albert has the thesaurus out again! #

Poor Albert, if he just had a College degree he wouldn't have to put on such a pathetic display of airs.

Words in prose ought to express the intended meaning; if they attract attention to themselves, it is a fault; in the very best styles you read page after page without noticing the medium.
Works of imagination should be written in very plain language; the more purely imaginative they are, the more necessary it is to be plain.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge

The finest language is mostly made up of simple unimposing words.
George Eliot



Poor Willy Boy. Never any comment about the post, but always an ad hominem derision of the poster.

That, my dear Willy Boy, speaks far more eloquently about the paucity of your political philosophy (and I am being overly generous to so designate it, but I can be charitable), not to even mention the vacuousness of your thin intellectual poses, than any puerile comment about me.

I thrive on the mean comments of such small minds.

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
That means you get a big kick out of reading your own posts, Commander McBragg...

[W3MIV]

Oooooh, Davey, you're such a clever brute!

I confess, you and Willy Boy do make a nice couple. So well matched.

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

[w0aew]

Quote[/b] (W8EFA @ Jan. 13 2008,23:05)]Bow Tie Albert has the thesaurus out again! #
Gift-wrapped feces?

The fact that GWB made it to the presidency is proof to the world that this country is largely composed of idiots, regardless of vocabulary.

[KA8DKT]

Quote[/b] (KB1KIX @ Jan. 13 2008,06:38)]Upset?

You wish.

I find your need to post the topic hilarious.

I'm actually entertained by the whole thing.

A conservative at the slimes - they need a little more truth.

Jonathan
Are you suggesting that Kristol's comments are accurate and correct? The truth?

-gary

[n2nh]

Quote[/b] (w0aew @ Jan. 14 2008,11:38)]Quote[/b] (W8EFA @ Jan. 13 2008,23:05)]Bow Tie Albert has the thesaurus out again!
Gift-wrapped feces?
And Albertos poopy diapers er.. depends made out of Kristols columns.

[W3MIV]

Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Jan. 14 2008,23:38)]Quote[/b] (w0aew @ Jan. 14 2008,11:38)]Quote[/b] (W8EFA @ Jan. 13 2008,23:05)]Bow Tie Albert has the thesaurus out again! #
Gift-wrapped feces?
And Albertos poopy diapers er.. depends made out of Kristols columns.
Very intellectual response, John. Nice illustration of how you liberal Nu Yoahk dumbos support freedom of speech. Even ol' Art Sulzberger has a better handle on that than you.

Hint: You don't have to read Kristol's columns.

Or is it, perhaps, that creeping terror that something he might print is really too close to the truth to let loose among the mindless faithful?

[W3MIV]

"Conservative MSM?"

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif

You lose, John, as usual. I am always happy to read liberal columns (I even find some worthwhile ideas buried in them -- even the blind pig can find an acorn every now and again), but the only 'paper I read regularly is the WSJ. Their editorial policy is to open the paper to every viewpoint.

I receive RSS feeds from most of the major news media, including the NYT, LAT, Balto Sun, WashPost, USAToday, and many others. I also subscribe to the Jewish World Review, which reprints a wide assortment of columnists and cartoons --- which I know are your favorites since the pictures are easy to follow and give your tongue a rest from the incessant chewing inspired by troublesome vocabulary.

As to my characterization of the thread as lacking any worthwhile substance, that is still true despite my participation. It is not quite "obsession," John, merely amusement. I also toss a few peanuts to the monkeys when I stroll through a different zoo than this one.

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

[W3MIV]

A deletion, John? Feel a bit of shame over something? Or a touch of embarrassment?

It's OK, really. We understand.

[n2nh]

Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 15 2008,06:49)]Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Jan. 14 2008,23:38)]Quote[/b] (w0aew @ Jan. 14 2008,11:38)]Quote[/b] (W8EFA @ Jan. 13 2008,23:05)]Bow Tie Albert has the thesaurus out again!
Gift-wrapped feces?
And Albertos poopy diapers er.. depends made out of Kristols columns.
Very intellectual response, John. Nice illustration of how you liberal Nu Yoahk dumbos support freedom of speech. Even ol' Art Sulzberger has a better handle on that than you.

Hint: You don't have to read Kristol's columns.

Or is it, perhaps, that creeping terror that something he might print is really too close to the truth to let loose among the mindless faithful?
More than likely, it is the realization that you are compelled, no, obsessed with replying to a topic that you yourself categorized as "there is nothing of importance in the post". Methinks thou dost protest too much Alberto. It sure does stink like sun baked, week old, doody filled diapers when you perform your danse while quoting your long-suffering thesaurus.

Too bad I've lost what little respect for you I had now that you're looking for wriggle room Alberto. Truth? Neither you nor Kristol would know it if it hit you on the head. I've already proved that about Kristol. Worse yet, you just proved it about yourself.

[W3MIV]

"Proved?"

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif

Why don't you give ol' Art Sulzberger a call, John, and see if he will give you a spot on the editorial pages. After all, anyone who has "proved" that Kristol knows nothing about "Truth" deserves a wider audience than here.

Let us all know what Art has to say. Meanwhile, I shall continue to "wriggle" for your amusement.

[n2nh]

Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 15 2008,07:52)]A deletion, John? Feel a bit of shame over something? Or a touch of embarrassment?

It's OK, really. We understand.
Disappointed Alberto? Except for the first line, that reply was a non-sequitor to what I posted anyway. No, not ashamed, just not going to bother replying to someone who can't seem to get away from a topic he said he had nada on, yet is still here posting to himself. After all, all you needed to do was quote me.

In the end, Kristol can make up all the crud he wants. He is pandering to the neocons who want to hear his banal lullabies of assurance. In a year, the Neocon nightmare will be something for historians to look in their thesauruses for synonyms to Failure. And Neocons will be the lepers of the America that rejected them.

Yes proved. Look up the first post. Nice to know that you're a blowhard that doesn't have a clue, but I've suspected that for awhile.

[W3MIV]

"Proved?" Sure, you did. In your mind, if in no one else's.

It always comes down to the ad hominem, doesn't it? Whenever you can't quite deal with the topic, itself, you feel you must deal with the poster -- whether it is here or in the editorial pages of the NYT. Being wholly unable to refute Kristol's ideas, you merely deprecate the man instead.

That's a very telling trait, John.

[w0aew]

Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Jan. 15 2008,06:21)]It always comes down to the ad hominem, doesn't it? Whenever you can't quite deal with the topic, itself, you feel you must deal with the poster -- whether it is here or in the editorial pages of the NYT. Being wholly unable to refute Kristol's ideas, you merely deprecate the man instead.

That's a very telling trait, John.
Quote[/b] ]Well, it's nice to see ol' "Troller-in-Motion" is back at the old stand hawking his usual brand of Nujork fertilizer.

Glad to see you are back to normal, John. HNY.


Quote[/b] ]If anything, John, your resort to such a thread is indicative of a need for withdrawal from the cartoons which govern your credal stances on political topics.


Quote[/b] ]That, my dear Willy Boy, speaks far more eloquently about the paucity of your political philosophy (and I am being overly generous to so designate it, but I can be charitable), not to even mention the vacuousness of your thin intellectual poses, than any puerile comment about me.


Quote[/b] ]Oooooh, Davey, you're such a clever brute!

I confess, you and Willy Boy do make a nice couple. So well matched.


Quote[/b] ]Very intellectual response, John. Nice illustration of how you liberal Nu Yoahk dumbos support freedom of speech.

It sure does.

[ab1ga]

Quote[/b] (kc7jty @ Jan. 13 2008,10:10)]So, What Makes Kristol Right to Be a TIMES Op-Ed?
Perhaps connections in very high places?
The New York Times is still trying to find someone to fill William Safire's shoes, but it seems they didn't think they'd found him yet, so they're trying Mr. Kristol on for size.

[kc7jty]

Quote[/b] (ab1ga @ Jan. 15 2008,10:38)]Quote[/b] (kc7jty @ Jan. 13 2008,10:10)]So, What Makes Kristol Right to Be a TIMES Op-Ed?
Perhaps connections in very high places?
The New York Times is still trying to find someone to fill William Safire's shoes, but it seems they didn't think they'd found him yet, so they're trying Mr. Kristol on for size.
He's like a size 87 shoe. Doesn't fit nowhere, noway, nohow.