CONSERVATIVE: We Should Have ANOTHER 9/11! VID

[n2nh]

Quote[/b] ]Now I've heard everything! This morning on FOX & Friends, the trio of hosts discussed an unbelievable column written by Stu Bykofsky in the Philadelphia Daily News. Entitled "To Save America, we need another 9-11", Bykofsky suggests that another terrorist attack would help to heal the the great divide in America. Can you say "crazy as a loon"?

[...]

How many Republicans go to bed at night thinking exactly what Bykofsky has written? How many liberals have expressed their fear that just such an event could be manufactured?

* NUTS! * (http://www.newshounds.us/2007/08/10/lunacy_101_stu_bykofsky_suggests_that_another_911_ attack_would_bring_us_all_together.php#more)

[w2amr]

Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Aug. 10 2007,15:10)]Quote[/b] ]Now I've heard everything! This morning on FOX & Friends, the trio of hosts discussed an unbelievable column written by Stu Bykofsky in the Philadelphia Daily News. Entitled "To Save America, we need another 9-11", Bykofsky suggests that another terrorist attack would help to heal the the great divide in America. Can you say "crazy as a loon"?

[...]

How many Republicans go to bed at night thinking exactly what Bykofsky has written? How many liberals have expressed their fear that just such an event could be manufactured?

* NUTS! * (http://www.newshounds.us/2007/08/10/lunacy_101_stu_bykofsky_suggests_that_another_911_ attack_would_bring_us_all_together.php#more)
Fairly unbalanced? http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

[n4sva]

The Truth behind NewsHounds...from founder's personal web site:





News? (http://www.jimgilliam.com/about.php)

[n2nh]

Quote[/b] (n4sva @ Aug. 10 2007,20:57)]The Truth behind NewsHounds...from founder's personal web site:





News? (http://www.jimgilliam.com/about.php)
Dude, there's a video there. They got the goods on this one.

Better yet, here is the Article from MR Let's Do It Again.Mr Wonderful Neocon wants another 9/11. (http://www.philly.com/dailynews/columnists/stu_bykofsky/20070809_Stu_Bykofskywe_need_another_9_11.html)

And Jim Gilliam got the goods on the faulty Iraqi intel.

Good one SVA. It shows how they deal in facts.
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif

[KA8DKT]

It is documented by the neocons that they needed what happened on 9-11 to push forward their agenda. #And that documentation is on the record a year before 9-11 occurred.

Does it surprise you that they want to try it again?
#
The power that they gained by the first attack is waning badly and I'm sure they think they can regalvanize their fear campaign with another attack. #These people will stop at nothing in their lust for power.

-gary

[n2nh]

What surprises me is that they are admitting that they would do something like this on purpose. That they are admitting publicly that it's okay with neocons that they feel Americans should be sacrificed for their own selfish ends.

It's a revelation that neocons have come out of their closet to support the terrorists over their fellow Americans. And that they would gladly kill us for their own ends.

[N2RJ]

Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Aug. 10 2007,17:10)]Quote[/b] ]Now I've heard everything! This morning on FOX & Friends, the trio of hosts discussed an unbelievable column written by Stu Bykofsky in the Philadelphia Daily News. Entitled "To Save America, we need another 9-11", Bykofsky suggests that another terrorist attack would help to heal the the great divide in America. Can you say "crazy as a loon"?

[...]

How many Republicans go to bed at night thinking exactly what Bykofsky has written? How many liberals have expressed their fear that just such an event could be manufactured?

* NUTS! * (http://www.newshounds.us/2007/08/10/lunacy_101_stu_bykofsky_suggests_that_another_911_ attack_would_bring_us_all_together.php#more)
I think I saw that on TV.

Disgusting.

Of course, the Kons will try to spin it in their favor.

I lived through 9/11, unlike most of the kons in this country, I was close to the disaster and in the disaster area.

I (we) do NOT want another one to happen.

[k4kyv]

Sounds familiar. Reminds me too closely of something we heard exactly a year before 11SE01.

Quote[/b] ](September 2000) ...Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions...
REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES (http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf)

[ad4mg]

Quote[/b] (k4kyv @ Aug. 12 2007,14:39)]Sounds familiar. Reminds me too closely of something we heard exactly a year before 11SE01.

Quote[/b] ](September 2000) ...Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions...
REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES (http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf)
There's that pesky PNAC again. It must be some kind of covert thing ... the Kons get themselves all lathered up when I mention the PNAC.

[KG4CGC]

Loose Change (http://www.loosechange911.com/)

From the site: "However, when one looks deeper into the evidence, one might come to the startling conclusion that our own government might have been directly responsible for the attacks themselves."

Controlled demolitions, even a building that was UNTOUCHED went down in the same manner.
I saw the same thing everyone else saw on that gruesome morning as it happened. I remember clearly the planes hitting the towers especially the second one. A flat gray unmarked plane, NOT an American Airlines jet.

Yeah, I know. I must be crazy.

[KA8DKT]

Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Aug. 12 2007,14:49)]Quote[/b] (k4kyv @ Aug. 12 2007,14:39)]Sounds familiar. #Reminds me too closely of something we heard exactly a year before 11SE01.

Quote[/b] ](September 2000) ...Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions...
REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES (http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf)
There's that pesky PNAC again. #It must be some kind of covert thing ... the Kons get themselves all lathered up when I mention the PNAC.
Exactly, exactly, exactly. How many times have I linked to that document right here on these pages? How many people besides you actually bothered to read the document?

-gary

[ad4mg]

Quote[/b] (KA8DKT @ Aug. 12 2007,15:44)]Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Aug. 12 2007,14:49)]Quote[/b] (k4kyv @ Aug. 12 2007,14:39)]Sounds familiar. Reminds me too closely of something we heard exactly a year before 11SE01.

Quote[/b] ](September 2000) ...Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions...
REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES (http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf)
There's that pesky PNAC again. It must be some kind of covert thing ... the Kons get themselves all lathered up when I mention the PNAC.
Exactly, exactly, exactly. How many times have I linked to that document right here on these pages? How many people besides you actually bothered to read the document?

-gary
I've read every word on that site. More than once. If you want to really be frightened, the writings of these lunatics should fill that bill.

I don't know if it's denial, apathy, or what. Or some twisted, distorted sense of uber-patriotism, or just raw fear, but for a doctrine with the potential impact that it has, getting so little notice, is nothing short of alarming.

Maybe we truly are nothing but sheeple.

[N1LAF]

Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Aug. 12 2007,14:38)]Quote[/b] (KA8DKT @ Aug. 12 2007,15:44)]Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Aug. 12 2007,14:49)]Quote[/b] (k4kyv @ Aug. 12 2007,14:39)]Sounds familiar. Reminds me too closely of something we heard exactly a year before 11SE01.

Quote[/b] ](September 2000) ...Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions...
REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES (http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf)
There's that pesky PNAC again. It must be some kind of covert thing ... the Kons get themselves all lathered up when I mention the PNAC.
Exactly, exactly, exactly. How many times have I linked to that document right here on these pages? How many people besides you actually bothered to read the document?

-gary
I've read every word on that site. More than once. If you want to really be frightened, the writings of these lunatics should fill that bill.

I don't know if it's denial, apathy, or what. Or some twisted, distorted sense of uber-patriotism, or just raw fear, but for a doctrine with the potential impact that it has, getting so little notice, is nothing short of alarming.

Maybe we truly are nothing but sheeple.
Luke Skywalker, I don't see any Darth Vaders here.. (couldn't resist).

Anyways, good post, sorry to disappoint the libs here, no conservative spin. Was FOX News the only news to cover this? Did you catch that caption on FOX News, 'Sick Suggestion'? Looks fair and balanced to me.

There is a point that was brought up, is the concern about internal division. You see that bad example in our own congress and politicians. Its really frustrating.

The problem is, they haven't been to The Island (http://zrq.informe.com), and if they have, they may get another perspective and respect for others.

[ad4mg]

Quote[/b] (N1LAF @ Aug. 12 2007,17:54)]Luke Skywalker, I don't see any Darth Vaders here.. (couldn't resist).

Anyways, good post, sorry to disappoint the libs here, no conservative spin. Was FOX News the only news to cover this? Did you catch that caption on FOX News, 'Sick Suggestion'? Looks fair and balanced to me.

There is a point that was brought up, is the concern about internal division. You see that bad example in our own congress and politicians. Its really frustrating.

The problem is, they haven't been to The Island (http://zrq.informe.com), and if they have, they may get another perspective and respect for others.
Hi Paul! Yes, I noted the caption, and noted the nice young lady being most uncomfortable with the topic. I don't have the same level of disdain for Fox as all here do, but I note their bias, like all the other networks have. No biggie, just apply the necessary filter.

A cursory glance at the PNAC site reveals nothing to be disturbed about, but a thorough read of the site reveals some disturbing trains of thought.

I fully support having a strong military, only a fool wouldn't, but for purposes of defense, to help our allies, and, if necessary, to protect our interests abroad. I think the role of our military has been well defined for a couple of hundred years or so, and I see no need to redefine it's role at this time. Strengthen yes, redefine, no.

Your opinion may differ here, but I do support our invasion of Afghanistan to remove the Taliban, who harbored the terrorist network responsible for the attacks of 9/11/2001, but on the same note, I see the invasion of Iraq as an abuse of our military, with no justification ever being given for the need of the immediate attack. Even with the intelligence given at the time, the need appeared anything but immediate. I fail to see where 30 or 60, or even 90 days would have mattered, and we likely would have found reason not to attack Iraq.

Water over the dam now, I'm afraid.

I gotta hide out now, as I'm normally attacked viciously whenever I attempt to debate rationally, for I'm a lib'rul lune, or something like that! http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif

73.

[ka5piu]

Hello.

Speaking of The Island (http://zrq.informe.com/) , did this replace Hamsexy (http://forums.hamsexy.com/) ?

[K6BBC]

Yes, Neocons need another 9/11 - they have been sucking the bones of the last one for six years. They need some fresh meat.

bbc

[KA8DKT]

Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Aug. 12 2007,17:38)]Quote[/b] (KA8DKT @ Aug. 12 2007,15:44)]Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Aug. 12 2007,14:49)]Quote[/b] (k4kyv @ Aug. 12 2007,14:39)]Sounds familiar. #Reminds me too closely of something we heard exactly a year before 11SE01.

Quote[/b] ](September 2000) ...Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions...
REBUILDING AMERICA’S DEFENSES (http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf)
There's that pesky PNAC again. #It must be some kind of covert thing ... the Kons get themselves all lathered up when I mention the PNAC.
Exactly, exactly, exactly. #How many times have I linked to that document right here on these pages? #How many people besides you actually bothered to read the document?

-gary
I've read every word on that site. #More than once. #If you want to really be frightened, the writings of these lunatics should fill that bill.

I don't know if it's denial, apathy, or what. #Or some twisted, distorted sense of uber-patriotism, or just raw fear, but for a doctrine with the potential impact that it has, getting so little notice, is nothing short of alarming.

Maybe we truly are nothing but sheeple.
Now, check out the Defense Planning Guidance published in 1993. It is classified Secret, but a good part of it was leaked. That which was leaked is even more frightening than the Aug 2000 document from the PNAC.

-gary