PDA

View Full Version : A Democrat you could vote for


KC4HGH
06-21-2007, 05:31 PM
From the Cumberland Times-News:

As a moderate and gun supporter, Richardson Dems' best bet

To the Editor:

With the unusually early race for the presidency in 2008, it seems the media had created so-called "rock star" candidates in order to add to the hype. With the likes of Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Barack Obama, Rudy Giuliani, and John Edwards, it is easy to miss the second and third tier candidates that are also in the race for the White House in 2008. One should be wary of not only each candidate's stance on issues but also their experience in dealing with those issues. With most of these candidates, popular or not, holes can be found throughout each resume, with the exception of one.

Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico is a Democrat running for the presidency in 2008. Gov. Richardson's resume is so expansive that it would be very difficult to point to an issue he has not had experience with. As a 14-year congressman, Secretary of Energy, Ambassador to the United Nations, and now popular two-term Governor of New Mexico (A Republican stronghold), it is indisputable that he is in fact the most qualified candidate for the job. To back his experience, he is a moderate and can therefore appeal to a large majority of the country. Richardson won the New Mexico gubernatorial race with 68 percent of the vote for this very reason.

Richardson has many important domestic plans for the country if he becomes elected. Richardson is a rare breed in the Democratic Party. He is a man that is a strong supporter for the Second amendment. He believes gun ownership is a very important right that should not be taken away. He is also opposed to increasing taxes whenever possible. In his first year as governor, he created tax cuts that promoted significant growth and investment in the state. In New Mexico alone, over 80,000 new jobs have been created, and unemployment is the lowest it has been in 30 years. Personal income is rising at near-record levels. Teacher pay and standards have risen, and the overall quality of the schools has gone up accordingly. Richardson balanced the budget for five years in a row.

He also has a very good environmental record. Under Bill Richardson's leadership, New Mexico has become the Clean Energy State. Just this year, Richardson signed a law requiring state utilities to quadruple their use of renewable energy. The state's wind, solar and biofuels industries are booming - creating hundreds of new jobs. And New Mexico has some of the country's toughest greenhouse-gas reduction goals. Bill Richardson's domestic goals will lead this country in the right direction by making it clean and prosperous.

Domestic policy isn't the only thing important to Richardson. Obviously, the foreign policy of the current administration has continued its downward spiral since the invasion of Iraq. Gov. Richardson has had several successful diplomatic meetings with some of the world's most notorious tyrants. In particular, he secured the release of two American civilians in Iraq by negotiating with Saddam Hussein. In 2006, Richardson flew to Sudan and secured the release of National Geographic journalist Paul Salopek. He also spoke to North Korea regarding their nuclear program. This man has proven that military responses are not always the answer and that improving relations with states around the world can be beneficial to the U.S. It isn't a surprise that he has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize four times. In the coming years, strong international experience will be a must for the president, and Richardson's is second to none.

The list of accomplishments by Bill Richardson could go on and on. However, when election day rolls around vote for the candidate who not only talks about the issues, but has actually gotten things done. Don't let mainstream media tell you who to vote for. Do your homework and decide for yourself.

Kevin P. McKenzie
LaVale

Interesting...seems like the media doesn't want YOU to know something about the "other guys". This would be an interesting fellow to investigate further....

N6KX
06-21-2007, 06:11 PM
...Or it could be a ploy to keep him under the radar for as long as possible, lest the Republicans spend too much time preparing to discredit, slander, and invalidate his candidacy. They can't reasonably argue issues, so they usually resort to character assassination and other ad hominem attacks. "Let them eat Hillary."

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif

w4wtf
06-21-2007, 06:16 PM
If it came down to him vs Rudy or Bloomberg, he may very well get my vote.

He definitly is better of firearms issues.

AC0H
06-21-2007, 07:59 PM
He's got ads running here now.
I thought that he'd be the one and only dem I could vote for until he uttered the word "Kyoto" in one of those ads. That killed it for me.

k0ews
06-22-2007, 12:57 AM
He's my favorite Democrat running. If he doesn't get the top nomination, I'd have to put him as a strong choice for the VP on whatever ticket does win.
As for Kyoto, that doesn't bother me so much as several states in America have tougher environmental standards than Kyoto right now.
Of all of the Dems, I do think he is the most qualified. Not a lot on style, but plenty of substance.

kf6rdn
06-22-2007, 01:04 AM
Quote[/b] (KC4HGH @ June 21 2007,09:31)]Interesting...seems like the media doesn't want YOU to know something about the "other guys". This would be an interesting fellow to investigate further....
I never hear anything about Tom Tancredo, one of the strongest guys on illegal immigration..

Not sure how he stands on other issues.

KC4HGH
06-22-2007, 06:00 PM
Quote[/b] (kf6rdn @ June 21 2007,18:04)]Quote[/b] (KC4HGH @ June 21 2007,09:31)]Interesting...seems like the media doesn't want YOU to know something about the "other guys". #This would be an interesting fellow to investigate further....
I never hear anything about Tom Tancredo, one of the strongest guys on illegal immigration..

Not sure how he stands on other issues.
Good point...do you suppose "they" are keeping him down as well?

Where are the Left-wingers on this? As long as you mention something favorable about Demo's, they're silent...anything derogertory, they're madder'n a wet settin' hen! (Insert "double standard" here)

k4kyv
06-22-2007, 06:43 PM
Today's left is not talking about socializing industry, abolishing capitalism or destroying the rich. What now passes for "left" in American politics is really "moderate" by historical standards.

Now, pressure for comprehensive health care reform is broad and deep, arising from major businesses as well as traditional liberal bastions.

The reaction against conservatism is being fed by two streams — a move left by one part of the electorate, and a frustration with ideological politics altogether by another part. That's why New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg hit a responsive chord when he declared this week that "good ideas should take precedence over rigid adherence to any particular political ideology."

What voters are demanding have to do with problems that have not been framed by the "right": the need to disengage from Iraq, to create health security and to ease economic inequalities. It's time to update our sense of where the political center lies, and to adjust our view of "the left" accordingly.

Center shifts from the 'right' (http://www.theleafchronicle.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070622/OPINION/706220324/1014/OPINION)