View Full Version : WTC Collapse Study
This should put to rest the wackjob theories who think everyone and everything except the planes brought the towers down.
The Planes Did It (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,284816,00.html)
K2WH (Neocon)
KC2RPP
06-20-2007, 01:37 PM
idk...it was a sad sad day. I had a couple of relatives that died in it. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif
My favorite song about that day-Alan Jackson-Where were you
W1GUH
06-20-2007, 02:23 PM
I just knew this would show up.
The report was only about the most visible part of the whole incident, and, again, done years after, and with no access to physical evidence. Under those conditions it can only say "Yes, it could have happened this way." not "It did happen this way." There's much, much else to explain...see the other threads on this topic.
Oh please, just when I thought the black helicopter crowd took the summer off. #Couldn't you do a code/no code post instead.....
KD6NIG
06-20-2007, 02:46 PM
It should....
But it won't http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif
W1GUH
06-20-2007, 02:58 PM
I think this topic has been so thoroughly explored, we could alll probably write each other's replies.
There's a certain amount of predictability going on.
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
Quote[/b] (W1GUH @ June 20 2007,06:23)]I just knew this would show up.
Doh!
kf6rdn
06-20-2007, 05:53 PM
Quote[/b] (W1GUH @ June 20 2007,06:58)]I think this topic has been so thoroughly explored, we could alll probably write each other's replies.
There's a certain amount of predictability going on.
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
Lol!
Isn't that the case with most of the political and opinion topics?
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
w8znx
06-20-2007, 07:00 PM
Quote[/b] (K2WH @ June 20 2007,06:09)]This should put to rest the wackjob theories who think everyone and everything except the planes brought the towers down.
The Planes Did It (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,284816,00.html)
K2WH (Neocon)
every now and then
we agree
on
some subject
Mac
( anarchist, atheist )
If this is true, then why is someone trying so hard to "prove the truth?" If it is truth, there is no need for 'proof,' it would be all fact, all unvarnished and would stand on it's own.
Next we'll be told it was the planet Venus and swamp gas from New Jersey. The wackos are the ones that just keep eating this stuff by the vat full. The same ones that were experimented on at the Bikini Atoll atomic test and were told it was safe. The same ones that are still practicing drop and cover.
If this is so, why was there such a great rush to dismantle the crime scene (since that is what a terrorist attack is, a crime) as quickly as possible. There was never any real investigation at the site and as such this theory is no more likely than the 'explosion' theory or any other well thought out theory.
Paul is right. This was old before it was posted.
n2ize
06-20-2007, 07:51 PM
I firmly believe that all three of those buildings collapsed entirely due to the pancake effect initiated by the impact of those planes and the subsequent heat damage.
The resons some people are skeptical is that all three buildings collapsed so neatly right into thei buildings own footprint which makes it seem like a planned implosion.
But we have to face reality. There is sometimes order to be found in chaos. In this case a systematic and sequential and "relatively neat" and perfect collaps of two of the worlds largest buildings. It is not hard to understand how some might scratch their heads in disbelief.
However, scientifically it appears that it was merely a systematic collaps of floors onto floors. Nothing sinsiter...
I am about puzzled about the collapse of the third skyscraper. However it appears it was close enough to absorb enough heat and melt to the ground.
KC9KOC
06-20-2007, 08:13 PM
There are still people who believe the moon landing was faked.
You can lead a person to reason, but you can't make them drink.
kc0ukk
06-20-2007, 11:49 PM
Quote[/b] (KC9KOC @ June 20 2007,13:13)]There are still people who believe the moon landing was faked. #
You can lead a person to reason, but you can't make them drink.
Nope, the murder of JFK was faked so he could go on the first trip to the moon. He's now spending his retirement years fishing on Mars. (Those 'failed' Mars missions didn't fail after all).
Quote[/b] (n2ize @ June 20 2007,14:51)]The resons some people are skeptical is that all three buildings collapsed so neatly right into thei buildings own footprint which makes it seem like a planned implosion.
But we have to face reality. There is sometimes order to be found in chaos. In this case a systematic and sequential and "relatively neat" and perfect collaps of two of the worlds largest buildings. It is not hard to understand how some might scratch their heads in disbelief.
However, scientifically it appears that it was merely a systematic collaps of floors onto floors. Nothing sinsiter...
I am about puzzled about the collapse of the third skyscraper. However it appears it was close enough to absorb enough heat and melt to the ground.
People are skeptical because they'd rather blame a president and government they don't like rather than the terrorists. It's November 2000 syndrome.
Some people are so ready to believe GWB and Haliburton planned the whole thing they'll throw physics, metallurgy, chemistry, engineering, and common sense right out the window.
It's what allows the noted mechanical engineer and scientist Rosie O'Dumbass to announce to the world that "steel doesn't melt".
If the planes had hit higher up on the buildings than they did there wouldn't have been 30+ floors worth of mass coming down. Just like an accordion.
If they'd have hit lower, maybe just above street level then you've got the mass of the entire building resting on a few damaged floors. Timber!
I guess the idiots would have been happier if two 1100 ft buildings of steel and glass had fallen over like trees in the woods and taken out everything and everyone in their path.