View Full Version : Why mommy's a Democrat.
N5NPO
03-16-2007, 01:04 PM
This says a lot.
I don't suppose this is indoctrination.
http://littledemocrats.net/index.html
kc8uzl
03-16-2007, 01:43 PM
This is the so stupid. Lets teach our children that they don't need morals. The democrats must think that if they don't do something they will lose all their voters.
VOTE REPUBLICAN
ad4mg
03-16-2007, 01:49 PM
Quote[/b] (kc8uzl @ Mar. 16 2007,08:43)]This is the so stupid. Lets teach our children that they don't need morals. The democrats must think that if they don't do something they will lose all their voters.
VOTE REPUBLICAN
Other threads here indicate that both parties seek to indoctrinate the young. No need to comment further on that.
In response to your campaign slogan, allow me to add my favorite:
Vote Republican - The Party of Hate
"One Way, Our Way"
The republicans must think that if they don't do something they will lose even more of their voters.
K0RGR
03-16-2007, 01:56 PM
Yes, I think this is a real book.
I'd rather have my kids read Mein Kampf, so they will recognize the GOP strategy when they see it.
N5NPO
03-16-2007, 08:50 PM
Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Mar. 16 2007,06:49)]Quote[/b] (kc8uzl @ Mar. 16 2007,08:43)]This is the so stupid. Lets teach our children that they don't need morals. The democrats must think that if they don't do something they will lose all their voters.
VOTE REPUBLICAN
Other threads here indicate that both parties seek to indoctrinate the young. #No need to comment further on that.
In response to your campaign slogan, allow me to add my favorite:
Vote Republican - The Party of Hate
"One Way, Our Way"
The republicans must think that if they don't do something they will lose even more of their voters.
I was wondering if you could tell me why you call the repulican party the party of hate. Could you provide me with some reasons and or examples?
THanks
ad4mg
03-16-2007, 08:54 PM
Already answered the same question in a reply to k2wh a few days ago.
You can find it if you're all that interested.
w2amr
03-16-2007, 09:04 PM
Burn the book and ship um off to Jesus camp.
N5NPO
03-16-2007, 09:09 PM
Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Mar. 16 2007,13:54)]Already answered the same question in a reply to k2wh a few days ago.
You can find it if you're all that interested.
I guess I will pass.
I do not have time nor enough interest to search for it.
Thanks anwyway.
kb2vxa
03-16-2007, 10:24 PM
The cover pic says it all, squirrels from outer space.
Please tell me this is a joke. It reeks of onion. Nice stereotypes.
http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/6204/rosiedonnellrq5.jpg
I feel bad for Rosie's wife. Who the hell was she looking at while enjoying the kiss of her "bride." http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif
kf6rdn
03-17-2007, 02:51 AM
Don't forget to look for the sequel:
Why Daddy is on Welfare.
http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/n/b/1/lieberman_bush_kiss.jpg
http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/5917/uploadedanimal006bg4.jpg
KI4PEQ
03-17-2007, 05:12 AM
Quote[/b] (al2n @ Mar. 16 2007,22:00)]http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/5917/uploadedanimal006bg4.jpg
Rosie O'Donnell before she shaves in the morning?
kc0ukk
03-17-2007, 06:21 AM
Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Mar. 16 2007,06:49)]Other threads here indicate that both parties seek to indoctrinate the young. #No need to comment further on that.
That's a given. The question however, remains. What is it that you will seek to imbue in your children?
Shall we kill our daughters for shaming our family? Who is it that decides what, exactly, is shaming our family?
Having trouble choosing? I'd go for the system that says you choose rather than the one that chooses for me.
w2amr
03-17-2007, 08:39 AM
Quote[/b] (N5NPO @ Mar. 16 2007,06:04)]This says a lot.
I don't suppose this is indoctrination.
http://littledemocrats.net/index.html
Wonder if the book contains chapters about Clinton's out sourcing of jobs resulting from NAFTA, or Joe Biden's legislation that allows the credit card companies to gouge the public even more?
n2ize
03-17-2007, 08:46 AM
Quote[/b] (n9xr @ Mar. 16 2007,20:44)]http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/n/b/1/lieberman_bush_kiss.jpg
Je t'aime
k4kyv
03-17-2007, 08:50 AM
Don't all parents have a legitimate right to indoctrinate their children to their political, moral and religious beliefs, whatever they may be? Ever notice the propaganda that passes for children's literature in religious book stores? (I'm not saying that there is anything objectionable about this, if the parents freely choose to purchase it).
But neither book should be distributed to children by public schools or government employees.
W3MIV
03-17-2007, 10:18 AM
Quote[/b] (n9xr @ Mar. 16 2007,22:44)]http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/n/b/1/lieberman_bush_kiss.jpg
Take it from an expert, that's a really bad PhotoShop job.
W3MIV
03-17-2007, 10:26 AM
Author of the "book" was born in Ohio and now lives in Madison, Wisconsin. Says a lot.
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
N5NPO
03-17-2007, 01:37 PM
Quote[/b] (kf6rdn @ Mar. 16 2007,19:51)]Don't forget to look for the sequel:
Why Daddy is on Welfare.
Daddy can't get on welfare. He is a white male. He lives with his elderly mom because his alimony and child support eats up 65% of his after tax take home pay. Mommy married another woman with a daughter named Heather (hince Heather has two mommies) and they now live in the $500,000 home that Daddy is paying for on top of the Alimony and Child support.
ad4mg
03-17-2007, 03:12 PM
Quote[/b] ]I was wondering if you could tell me why you call the repulican party the party of hate. Could you provide me with some reasons and or examples?
Here's an example:
Quote[/b] ]Grossly exaggerated stereotypical Neocon rant: Daddy can't get on welfare. He is a white male. He lives with his elderly mom because his alimony and child support eats up 65% of his after tax take home pay. Mommy married another woman with a daughter named Heather (hince Heather has two mommies) and they now live in the $500,000 home that Daddy is paying for on top of the Alimony and Child support.
Extremism as its worst.
Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Mar. 17 2007,07:12)]Quote[/b] ]I was wondering if you could tell me why you call the repulican party the party of hate. Could you provide me with some reasons and or examples?
Here's an example:
Quote[/b] ]Grossly exaggerated stereotypical Neocon rant: Daddy can't get on welfare. He is a white male. He lives with his elderly mom because his alimony and child support eats up 65% of his after tax take home pay. Mommy married another woman with a daughter named Heather (hince Heather has two mommies) and they now live in the $500,000 home that Daddy is paying for on top of the Alimony and Child support.
Extremism as its worst.
Completely.
NPO's silly post plays to every dumb stereotype he can conjure up.
I wonder what it's like to be that paranoid?
N5NPO
03-17-2007, 04:33 PM
Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Mar. 17 2007,08:12)]Quote[/b] ]I was wondering if you could tell me why you call the repulican party the party of hate. Could you provide me with some reasons and or examples?
Here's an example:
Quote[/b] ]Grossly exaggerated stereotypical Neocon rant: Daddy can't get on welfare. He is a white male. He lives with his elderly mom because his alimony and child support eats up 65% of his after tax take home pay. Mommy married another woman with a daughter named Heather (hince Heather has two mommies) and they now live in the $500,000 home that Daddy is paying for on top of the Alimony and Child support.
Extremism as its worst.
LOL!!!
What did I say that was hateful?
Point it out.
BTW stereotypes usually have at least some element of truth. It may or may not be mean to point them out. For example, most hams have two or more antennas on their car. One could say my van looks like a stegasaurus. So what?
N5NPO
03-17-2007, 04:43 PM
Oh, btw, I am not nor have I ever been a member of the republican party. I belive their problem is that they are not conservative enough.
I belive in less government, more individual (not group) rights. I guess I am more libertarian. Is that a party of hate too?
ad4mg
03-17-2007, 04:54 PM
Quote[/b] ]LOL!!!
What did I say that was hateful?
Point it out.
BTW stereotypes usually have at least some element of truth. It may or may not be mean to point them out. For example, most hams have two or more antennas on their car. One could say my van looks like a stegasaurus. So what?Only for my own satisfaction will I bother to reply. I feel that any attempt to debate you is a total waste of time.
Quote[/b] ]Daddy can't get on welfare. He is a white male.Here you begin by playing the race card, a favorite tactic of the extreme right. You imply that only non-whites qualify for welfare.
Quote[/b] ]He lives with his elderly mom because his alimony and child support eats up 65% of his after tax take home pay.Stereotype. It can be determined that you wish to slur what you perceive as an extremely liberal judicial system prejudiced towards women. Double bonus points for this one.
Quote[/b] ]Mommy married another woman with a daughter named Heather (hince Heather has two mommies) and they now live in the $500,000 home that Daddy is paying for on top of the Alimony and Child support.Triple bonus points here. Your stereotypical view that all liberal women engage in an alternate lifestyle (you must watch a lot of Rosie or Ellen), indoctrinate their children to accept this lifestyle, and just to spread it around real well, you illustrate your gender bias towards women by labeling them as bloodsucking leeches living off of the sweat of poor impoverished men.
In its entirety, your paragraph is intended to instigate an angry response by utilizing the most exaggerated examples of liberalism you can conceive. It illustrates your contempt for any lifestyle that doesn't fit your narrow definition of morality. The neocon, unlike the real conservative, feels the need to poke, pry, and direct the lifestyles of anyone living outside the narrow, hypocritical definition of what they consider normal, all the while maintaining that it is the Democrats who engage in such behavior.
Hence my often repeated statement ... "One Way. Our Way".
I trust this response is satisfactory, as it will be the last one I'll offer. Your fake role playing games in other threads, also used to incite and agitate, have removed any desire I may have once had to enter into any sort of discussion with you.
KI4PEQ
03-17-2007, 09:01 PM
Quote[/b] (n9xr @ Mar. 16 2007,21:44)]http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/n/b/1/lieberman_bush_kiss.jpg
Gee, Joe! What's that aftershave you're wearing?
KE5FRF
03-17-2007, 10:05 PM
Quote[/b] (kf6rdn @ Mar. 16 2007,21:51)]Don't forget to look for the sequel:
Why Daddy is on Welfare.
OMG, why didn't I think of that one, ROTFLMAO
KE5FRF
03-17-2007, 10:12 PM
Quote[/b] ]He lives with his elderly mom because his alimony and child support eats up 65% of his after tax take home pay.
Stereotype. It can be determined that you wish to slur what you perceive as an extremely liberal judicial system prejudiced towards women. Double bonus points for this one.
Actually, that's no stereotype whatsoever. I don't live with my elderly mom, but the child support does eat up right at half of my take-home pay, and I was fortunate.
N5NPO
03-17-2007, 11:41 PM
Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Mar. 17 2007,09:54)]Quote[/b] ]LOL!!!
What did I say that was hateful?
Point it out.
BTW stereotypes usually have at least some element of truth. It #may or may not be mean to point them out. For example, most hams have two or more antennas on their car. One could say my van looks like a stegasaurus. So what?Only for my own satisfaction will I bother to reply. #I feel that any attempt to debate you is a total waste of time.
Quote[/b] ]Daddy can't get on welfare. He is a white male.Here you begin by playing the race card, a favorite tactic of the extreme right. #You imply that only non-whites qualify for welfare.
Quote[/b] ]He lives with his elderly mom because his alimony and child support eats up 65% of his after tax take home pay.Stereotype. #It can be determined that you wish to slur what you perceive as an extremely liberal judicial system prejudiced towards women. #Double bonus points for this one.
Quote[/b] ]Mommy married another woman with a daughter named Heather (hince Heather has two mommies) and they now live in the $500,000 home that Daddy is paying for on top of the Alimony and Child support.Triple bonus points here. #Your stereotypical view that all liberal women engage in an alternate lifestyle (you must watch a lot of Rosie or Ellen), indoctrinate their children to accept this lifestyle, and just to spread it around real well, you illustrate your gender bias towards women by labeling them as bloodsucking leeches living off of the sweat of poor impoverished men.
In its entirety, your paragraph is intended to instigate an angry response by utilizing the most exaggerated examples of liberalism you can conceive. #It illustrates your contempt for any lifestyle that doesn't fit your narrow definition of morality. #The neocon, unlike the real conservative, feels the need to poke, pry, and direct the lifestyles of anyone living outside the narrow, hypocritical definition of what they consider normal, all the while maintaining that it is the Democrats who engage in such behavior.
Hence my often repeated statement ... "One Way. #Our Way".
I trust this response is satisfactory, as it will be the last one I'll offer. #Your fake role playing games in other threads, also used to incite and agitate, have removed any desire I may have once had to enter into any sort of discussion with you.
I appreciate you taking time to reply.
I didn't expect to entirely or even parially agree, but that is ok.
I didn't intend to convey hate toward anyone with my paragraph of sterotypes. I can relate somewhat to my paragraph because of life's experiences.
I am sorry you seem so bitter towrards those you call neo-cons.
73 de N5NPO
N5NPO
03-17-2007, 11:50 PM
Quote[/b] (KE5FRF @ Mar. 17 2007,15:12)]Quote[/b] ]He lives with his elderly mom because his alimony and child support eats up 65% of his after tax take home pay.
Stereotype. #It can be determined that you wish to slur what you perceive as an extremely liberal judicial system prejudiced towards women. #Double bonus points for this one.
Actually, that's no stereotype whatsoever. I don't live with my elderly mom, but the child support does eat up right at half of my take-home pay, and I was fortunate.
Me too. I don't live with my elderly mother, but I did stay with my elderly father for a while.
The way I see it, if a woman or man leaves a family, or otherwise destroys a marrige for reasons other than abuse or infidelity, they leave eveything. I hate to see how many marriges/families are destroyed because the grass looks greener somewhere else or they just want to be free to mess around and they want to keep the kids and house and everything else while the other person gets left out in the cold with the bill...
If that is extreme and hateful, oh well.
Quote[/b] (nx6d @ Mar. 17 2007,11:27)]Quote[/b] (ad4mg @ Mar. 17 2007,07:12)]
NPO's silly post plays to every dumb stereotype he can conjure up.
I wonder what it's like to be that paranoid?
http://i17.tinypic.com/3zatuuh.jpg
Where do you think they got the "Australian" for moon-bounce?
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif
I am not paranoid.
They really are out to get me.
I took the whole thing as funny...
I thought it was funny... on the one "Sample Page" that Democrats always make sure we are safe, just like Mommy... as an Elephant is walking by... http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif Clever indeed...
Just to point out, I am a centrist, however leaning right... book made me laugh...
Also in the Quotes from different famous people endorsing the book, had a Negative quote from Rush Limbaugh... so I guess when Rush hates it that is considered positive... too funny.
Eric
Quote[/b] (KE5FRF @ Mar. 17 2007,14:12)]Quote[/b] ]He lives with his elderly mom because his alimony and child support eats up 65% of his after tax take home pay.
Stereotype. #It can be determined that you wish to slur what you perceive as an extremely liberal judicial system prejudiced towards women. #Double bonus points for this one.
Actually, that's no stereotype whatsoever. I don't live with my elderly mom, but the child support does eat up right at half of my take-home pay, and I was fortunate.
Sorry, Heath, not buying that one, unless you have a really bad lawyer.
I received child support for 13 years after my ex left. The amount she paid didn't put any holes in her nylons, and she was pretty much maxed out according to dissomaster. She sure as hell didn't LIKE to send me $1000 a month, but she always did. I never asked for an increase, because I didn't need the money the increase would provide, and she never trashed me to our daughter, (and vice versa).
Anyway, the point is my ex was remarried and had a six figure income job. The child support was a nuisance, but I don't think it ever affected her lifestyle much. She did eventually leave her husband (what a shock!) and move to Alaska, where she is now really poor, and learning to be a bush pilot of all things. The child support arrangement ended in 2004, so her dumb decisions don't impact me at all.
Dave NX6D
Tulelake, CA
N5NPO
03-18-2007, 11:32 PM
Quote[/b] (nx6d @ Mar. 18 2007,05:27)]Quote[/b] (KE5FRF @ Mar. 17 2007,14:12)]Quote[/b] ]He lives with his elderly mom because his alimony and child support eats up 65% of his after tax take home pay.
Stereotype. #It can be determined that you wish to slur what you perceive as an extremely liberal judicial system prejudiced towards women. #Double bonus points for this one.
Actually, that's no stereotype whatsoever. I don't live with my elderly mom, but the child support does eat up right at half of my take-home pay, and I was fortunate.
Sorry, Heath, not buying that one, unless you have a really bad lawyer.
I received child support for 13 years after my ex left. The amount she paid didn't put any holes in her nylons, and she was pretty much maxed out according to dissomaster. She sure as hell didn't LIKE to send me $1000 a month, but she always did. I never asked for an increase, because I didn't need the money the increase would provide, and she never trashed me to our daughter, (and vice versa).
Anyway, the point is my ex was remarried and had a six figure income job. The child support was a nuisance, but I don't think it ever affected her lifestyle much. She did eventually leave her husband (what a shock!) and move to Alaska, where she is now really poor, and learning to be a bush pilot of all things. The child support arrangement ended in 2004, so her dumb decisions don't impact me at all.
Dave NX6D
Tulelake, CA
The last time I went to fight over custody I was without a lawyer due to lack of money to pay one.
I lost custody to an adulterous woman who left the kids with me to be with her boyfriend.
The whole family court thing can be a real sham. The judge didn't care that she had in effect abandoned the kids. THat didn't matter because it was before the divorce (DUH, why do you think there was a divorce!) and the kids want to stay with mama now....
Texas court, texas Judge, I didn't live in Texas, mother does.
n4sva
03-19-2007, 02:07 AM
No greater evil than a scorned woman. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif
KE5FRF
03-19-2007, 02:26 AM
Dave,
Between all the things that I lost, the total value of it all, and the child support I pay, my wife wil be getting well over 150,000 from me from now until my son is grown. PLUS, she'll expect me to pay for a lot of stuff along the way that she can't force, but I'll be given a guilt trip if I don't. PLUS, she won't have any money saved for his college education (I know her) so I'll have to pick up that tab too. PLUS, I'll probably be the one helping him get his first car. All in all, I will say that my son's child support will cost me well over 200,000 before he gets out of college. Thats just a little less than 20,000 a year! I know adults who live off that. The "law" is supposed to be that the parents divide financial responsibility based on income percentages, but the bottom line is that I'm picking up the tab. IF we had not divorced, I can't imagine spending more than 150,000 on my son through the years (and thats giving him everything I never had)...and thats actually SHARING the burden. The other part of that story is that unless the mother has proven to be neglectful or irresponsible, most courts award the child to the mother by default. It doesn't matter that they cheated, or that they were abusive to the spouse(thats [abusive] not my case nor would I claim it)...My ex recently got a DUI, imagine that! Fortunately, my so was with me that weekend, so I can't really use that against her...and the other part of that is I don't want to force my son away from his mom, even though she forced him away from me. Yes, I had a bad lawyer, a lawyer who only cared to get my case over with and do the bare minimum. He was all I could afford, and I had no idea how little effort he would put forth. Anyway, yes, after taxes, I pay a heckuva lot in child support, almost half my earnings when you add all the money I had to give her to boot that I had to borrow to pay her off.
n4sva
03-19-2007, 02:35 AM
I have to say I have been blessed with a good wife for these past 12 years. She might end up murdering me, but so far no consideration of divorce.
KI4PEQ
03-20-2007, 04:54 AM
When things weren't going too well between the XYL and I a couple of years back, I actually talked to a family lawyer about where I would stand if I called it quits and filed for divorce.
After he explained that the wife would be entitled to over 55 percent of my disability compensation to pay for child support and spousal maintenance until the last child turned 18, I decided that I should stick things out. We did work out our differences.
But under the present laws, it IS cheaper to keep her.
N5NPO
03-20-2007, 10:42 AM
From my experience with my family court cases and my current wife's court cases I see very little justice in the family court system. It doesn't seem to matter if you have a lawyer or not, most of the time in my experiences, justice is not served. I just do not understand this.