PDA

View Full Version : The ARRL Letter, Vol 25, No 50


AA7BQ
12-23-2006, 04:54 PM
***************
The ARRL Letter
Vol. 25, No. 50
December 22, 2006
***************

IN THIS EDITION:

* +FCC drops Morse requirement for all license classes
* +League challenges FCC's dismissal of BPL interference complaints
* +"Hello" campaign concludes with voices on the air December 29-30
* +ARES volunteers muster in wake of weather emergencies
* +ESA astronaut conducts first ARISS school QSO in Swedish
* Solar Update
* IN BRIEF:
This weekend on the radio
ARRL Certification and Continuing Education course registration
+ARRL Kids Day is Sunday, January 7
AO-51 "Echo" is now carrier-access
New DX record claimed for 300+ GHz "traditional RF" operation
New 2-meter EME world record claimed
Reminder: "Beijing model 1" IRCs expire at year's end
Dale Hatfield, W0IFO, named Spectrum Advisory Committee chairman
Angus Tait, ZL3NL, is 2006 Fred M. Link Award winner
We stand corrected!

+Available on ARRL Audio News <http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/audio/>

================================================== =========
NOTE: ARRL Headquarters will be closed Christmas Day, Monday, December 25,
and New Year's Day, Monday, January 1, reopening the following day at 8 AM
Eastern Time in both instances. There will be no W1AW code practice or
bulletin transmissions on those days. In addition, there will be no editions
of The ARRL Letter or ARRL Audio News for Friday, December 29. Both will
return Friday, January 5, 2007. We wish everyone a safe and happy holiday
season!
================================================== =========
==>Delivery problems: First see FAQ
<http://www.arrl.org/members-only/faq.html#nodelivery>, then e-mail
<letter-dlvy@arrl.org>
==>Editorial questions or comments only: Rick Lindquist, N1RL,
<n1rl@arrl.org>
================================================== =========

==>FCC ELIMINATES MORSE CODE AS EXAM REQUIREMENT!

Early next year, the US will join the growing list of countries that no
longer require Amateur Radio applicants to pass a Morse code test as the
entry ticket to HF. Announcement of the pending historic rule change arrived
with no fanfare December 15 in an FCC public notice. A full-blown Report and
Order (R&O) in the proceeding, WT Docket 05-235, followed December 19. The
best estimate of when the Morse code requirement will go away officially is
sometime in February -- 30 days after the R&O appears in the Federal
Register.

"We . . . believe that the public interest is not served by requiring
facility in Morse code when the trend in amateur communications is to use
voice and digital technologies for exchanging messages," the FCC said in its
R&O. "Rather, we believe that because the international requirement for
telegraphy proficiency has been eliminated, we should treat Morse code
telegraphy no differently from other Amateur Service communications
techniques."

The FCC says it deems the current regime of written examinations "sufficient
to determine whether a person is qualified to be issued an Amateur Radio
operator license."

The FCC cast aside arguments that Morse ability is advantageous in
emergencies, concluding that most emergency communication is handled using
voice, data, or video techniques. The Commission also turned away assertions
that retaining a Morse requirement would help keep out the bad apples.

"The record is devoid of a demonstrated nexus between Morse code proficiency
and on-the-air conduct," the FCC observed. It concurred with one commenter's
observation that "maintaining the code requirement does not purge Amateur
Radio of bad operators. Education and self-policing does."

The FCC also ordered that all Technician licensees present and future --
whether or not they've passed a Morse code test, will get privileges on 80,
40, 15 and 10 meters identical to those of Novice licensees. "In eliminating
this disparity between Technician and Technician Plus licenses, we are
simplifying the Amateur Service licensing structure and promoting regulatory
parity," the FCC said.

The FCC took advantage of the occasion to act on the League's Petition for
Partial Reconsideration in the "omnibus" proceeding, WT Docket 04-140,
calling on the Commission to retain 3620 to 3635 kHz for automatically
controlled digital stations by moving the Extra class phone band edge to
3635 kHz. The FCC decided instead to authorize 3585 to 3600 kHz for such
operations, and leave the newly expanded phone band intact.

The Commission further amended Part 97 "to authorize Amateur Extra class
privileges to all individuals who have been issued a CEPT radio-amateur
license by their country of citizenship, and who satisfy other requirements
in the Commission's rules."

Although the FCC's Morse code decision came as no surprise, it nonetheless
revived debate on the issue. The FCC had proposed more than a year ago to
drop the Morse code requirement for all license classes. The record in the
proceeding, the FCC said, "reflects a division of views in the Amateur Radio
community." After reviewing the more than 3500 comments and
counter-proposals radio amateurs had filed, the Commission stuck with its
initial proposal.

ARRL President Joel Harrison, W5ZN, had this reaction: "While the
Commission's decision to delete the Morse code requirement for an Amateur
Extra Class license departs from the ARRL's recommendation, it is helpful to
have the matter resolved so we can move forward."

ARRL CEO David Sumner, K1ZZ, expressed a similar viewpoint. "Now that the
debate is over, we can focus on learning Morse code simply for its own
sake," he said. Sumner pledged that the League would maintain its
traditional support of Morse code as an operating mode and would continue to
offer Morse training materials as well as such incentives as bonus credit
for CW contacts in ARRL-sponsored operating events. ARRL's Hiram Percy Maxim
Memorial Station W1AW will keep its schedule of Morse code practice and
bulletin transmissions.

Since World Radiocommunication Conference 2003, the UK, Canada, Germany and
other countries have dropped their Morse requirements. Sumner said other
countries have successfully made the transition to a codeless testing
regime, and he doesn't anticipate problems in the US.

The pending disappearance of the Morse code requirement seems to have
rejuvenated the urge to upgrade. ARRL Sales and Marketing Manager Bob
Inderbitzen, NQ1R, says distribution of General Class license training
materials have skyrocketed in the week after the FCC announcement.

The pending disappearance of the Morse code requirement seems to have
rejuvenated the urge to upgrade. ARRL Sales and Marketing Manager Bob
Inderbitzen, NQ1R, says sales of General Class license training materials
have skyrocketed in the week after the FCC announcement.

The ARRL has posted information relevant to the FCC action in WT Docket
05-235, including an FAQ, on its Web site <http://www.arrl.org/fcc/morse/>.

==>ARRL CHALLENGES FCC DISMISSAL OF VIRGINIA BPL INTERFERENCE COMPLAINTS

The FCC has told five Manassas, Virginia, radio amateurs that its testing
showed the city's BPL system complies with FCC Part 15 rules, and it
dismissed their interference complaints. The League is questioning the
Commission's conclusions, however. Six Manassas radio amateurs earlier this
year complained of BPL interference to their mobile operations. FCC
engineers took measurements at several locations in Manassas on October 25
and 26. Spectrum Enforcement Division Chief Kathryn S. Berthot reported the
results December 14.

"These measurements demonstrate that the Manassas BPL system is in
compliance with the radiated emission limits specified in Section 15.611(b)
of the Commission's rules at the two sites in areas we tested where
emissions appear to be the highest," Berthot wrote, adding that the
measurements showed the system is notching at 20 dB or greater to protect
the 40-meter band. "Accordingly, based on the results of our investigation,
we conclude that the Manassas BPL system is in compliance with the FCC's
requirements, and the complaints are hereby dismissed." BPL proponent The
United Power Line Council called the letter "complete and total vindication"
of the Manassas BPL system.

Not so fast, says ARRL General Counsel Chris Imlay, W3KD, who responded
December 21 on behalf of the League and the complainants
<http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/BPL-Manassas-2006-12-21.pdf>. Imlay
maintained that Berthot's letter raises more questions than it answers.
Because the "alleged testing" took place in the presence of BPL operator
COMTek and equipment maker Main.net but without the complainants, Imlay
said, there's no independent means to evaluate the FCC's conclusions.

"In ARRL's view, the Commission owes the complainants a far more
comprehensive response to their two-year-old complaints than what is set
forth in the terse and uninformative dismissal letter," Imlay wrote. Copies
of his letter went to the five FCC commissioners and to the complainants.
One complainant, George Tarnovsky, K4GVT, says neither he nor the other five
complainants was alerted to the planned FCC testing. The others are Donald
"Butch" Blasdell, W4HJL; William South, N3OH; Arthur Whittum, W1CRO; Jack
Cochran, WC4J, and Dwight Agnew, AI4II.

Imlay says Berthot's December 14 letter overlooks Whittum's May 2006
interference complaint, and, because of that, Whittum's complaint "remains
pending and unadjudicated." Beyond that, Imlay contended, the Amateur Radio
complainants, as FCC licensees, deserve better treatment and protection from
the FCC.

Because the Commission -- and especially OET -- has exhibited "an
overwhelming and obvious bias in favor of BPL" and "done everything possible
to deny or obfuscate the substantial interference potential of BPL" on HF,
Imlay wrote, the League is unwilling to accept what he called "the
unsupported conclusions" in Berthot's letter. Those conclusions, he noted,
vary substantially with the complainants' own observations and measurements,
verified by the ARRL Laboratory staff.

Among other things, the League wants to know if any of the complainants were
notified prior to the FCC's October testing, whether the OET is "routinely
involved" in enforcement-related field measurements, when COMTek and
Main.net learned of the planned testing, precisely where the FCC tested and
how it determined the sites and the system's status during the tests --
including system loading. In addition, the League requested technical
details of the testing, including measured emission levels.

Imlay says the Amateur Radio complainants "have been stonewalled by the City
and COMTek, and now they have been stonewalled by the Commission, after
waiting patiently for two years for some action." If the FCC seriously
intends to claim that the Manassas system complies with the rules, he
continued, it "must be willing to provide the information necessary to
support its dismissal order with documentation that is objectively
verifiable."

==>HELLO" CAMPAIGN FINALE TO SHOWCASE HAM RADIO'S PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE

Amateur Radio past, present and future will be the focus as the ARRL's
"Hello" campaign <http://www.hello-radio.org/> concludes with on-the-air
events Friday and Saturday, December 29 and 30. Aimed at putting a friendly
face on Amateur Radio, "Hello" also has celebrated "100 years of voice over
radio worldwide." In 1906, Canadian experimenter Reginald Fessenden
transmitted a program of voice and music -- in essence the world's first
radio broadcast -- from Brant Rock, Massachusetts. His original goal had
been to make voice radio contact with a station in Machrihanish, Scotland,
but that plan fell through after a storm felled the Scottish station's
antenna. ARRL Media and Public Relations Manager Allen Pitts, W1AGP, says,
Fessenden, "in true ham radio spirit," switched to "Plan B," broadcasting a
Christmas Eve program to ships at sea.

"This month ham radio operators events will complete what Fessenden was
unable to do in 1906 with special event stations and a lot more," Pitts
says. "Three primary centennial special events will take to the airwaves
December 29 and 30, representing the past, present and future of Amateur
Radio."

Special event stations W100BO/W1F at Brant Rock -- sponsored by the Peconic
Amateur Radio Club (PARC) with Steve Barreres, K2CX, as team leader -- and
GB1FVT in Machrihanish -- with Duncan MacArthur, GM3TNT, heading that effort
-- will epitomize Amateur Radio Past (Icom UK and Icom America are supplying
equipment for both events). Hiram Percy Maxim Memorial Station W1AW at ARRL
Headquarters will represent Amateur Radio Future. The station will be on the
air with all voice modes for the event.

"In addition to the sites showing the past and future of radio, the
transmission modes used will also reflect both traditional as well as new
and emerging technologies," Pitts says. "The stations will be operating AM
-- an early 20th-century mode -- and SSB and FM -- both later 20th-century
modes. EchoLink and IRLP plus digital voice on HF will carry us into the
21st century." The special event will commence at 2000 UTC on Friday,
December 29, and continue through the next 24 hours.

During the W1AW "Hello" event operation, ARRL Membership Manager Katie
Breen, W1KRB, will run a real-time blog -- called "Hello -- Live!" -- that
will include both photos and video
<http://www.arrl.org/blog/Hello%20-%20Live%21>.

"This blog will be a way to find out and even see what's taking place at the
three keystone stations," Breen said. She hopes to be able to include photos
and video from all three sites. "I hope people will share their thoughts
<w1krb@arrl.org> on what Amateur Radio has meant to them, whether they're
longtime licensees or newcomers. I want this to be fun and interactive, so
the amateur community can get a real picture of who we are here in
Newington!"

Hundreds of other ham radio stations in the US and around the globe are also
set to participate in the event. The special event participants will use a
variety of modes, reflecting the advances that have been made in radio
technology since 1906.

Pitts says Fessenden's 1906 broadcast inspired others to start playing with
radio, or "wireless" -- a term that's come full circle over the decades. Ham
radio evolved from that sort of early tinkering, and ham radio operators
have been in the forefront of developing wireless technologies from the
start.

"They continue their role in exploring new designs and applications," he
notes. "Today's hams use satellites, computers, software defined radio,
microwave, voice over Internet protocol systems and other technologies
undreamed of in 1906. But it all started with the word 'Hello.'"

==>COLORADO, WESTERN WASHINGTON ARES VOLUNTEERS RESPOND TO WEATHER
EMERGENCIES

ARRL Colorado Section Emergency Coordinator Ben Baker, KB0UBZ, says Amateur
Radio Emergency Service (ARES) volunteers activated this week after a
blizzard struck December 20 and continued into the next day, paralyzing a
large part of the state and stranding thousands of air and highway
travelers. Snowfall totals averaging 20 to 30 inches around the Front Range
of Denver and 40 inches or more in the foothills west of Denver, Baker said.

"ARES districts all along the Front Range are active, reporting snow totals
as well as responding to served agency requests," Baker told ARRL
Headquarters December 21. "Amateur Radio operators supporting the Red Cross
and The Salvation Army have been staffing shelters, while other ARES members
have been using their four-wheel drive vehicles to transport essential and
emergency personnel to their assignments."

Colorado Gov Bill Owens declared a state of emergency and activated the
Colorado National Guard to assist in rescuing stranded motorists. The
Colorado Emergency Operations Center as well as county and local EOCs were
opened By week's end, major highways and Denver's airport were reopened to
traffic.

Elsewhere, ARES and Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service (RACES) teams
across Western Washington activated December 14 after severe weather struck
the Pacific Northwest, ARRL Western Washington Section Manager Ed Bruette,
N7NVP told ARRL. Eight people died, and nearly 1.5 million homes and
businesses lost electrical power in the wake of the strong winds and heavy
rainfall, although the communications infrastructure "pretty well stayed
intact," Bruette said.

"The need for ARES/RACES was to be staged and have circuits established at
the local EOCs and ECCs in case of major communication outages, with a
secondary mission to support Red Cross shelters," Bruette explained. "I'm
fairly certain every local ARES/RACES team in Western Washington was
activated." Fifteen American Red Cross shelters opened across the affected
region, and the state activated its EOC at Fort Murray.

Winds approaching 70 MPH were clocked at SeaTac Airport, Seattle's official
observation point, damaging the terminal and canceling flights. Bruette
predicted it could take several days to restore power in outlying areas.
Meanwhile, he noted, imprudent use of portable generators and other devices
had caused at least two deaths and sent many more to emergency rooms with
carbon monoxide poisoning.

"The number of CO poisonings in the area have been termed epidemic," Bruette
said. "In one case, 30 apartment dwellers were burning charcoal indoors to
stay warm." Gov Chris Gregoire urged Washingtonians to be aware of the
dangers of carbon monoxide poising and to spread the word to those without
power or heat.

Downed trees closed several major highways, while others fell victim to
flooding. Blocked roads affected public safety agencies' ability to respond,
Bruette said.

After weathering the worst of the storm at his fire district headquarters,
Bruette says he returned home to find he still had power -- and "all my
antennas are unharmed." Other radio amateurs in the region were not so
lucky, he added.

==>SWEDISH FROM SPACE VIA HAM RADIO DELIGHTS ARISS QSO AUDIENCE

The first Amateur Radio on the International Space Station (ARISS) school
contact in Swedish delighted both students and onlookers this past weekend.
European Space Agency astronaut Christer Fuglesang, SA0AFS/KE5CGR, chatted
in his native tongue Sunday, December 17, with youngsters at Thunman School
in Knivsta, Sweden. ARISS-Europe Chairman Gaston Bertels, ON4WF, said
everyone enjoyed hearing the Swedish language from space.

"Christer answered 13 questions from the students," Bertels noted.
"Funglesang is the first Swedish astronaut and enthusiasm in Sweden is
topmost. The audience was delighted with hearing Swedish spoken from space."

Students and an estimated audience of 500 gathered in Kvistna's sport hall
for the event, Bertels said. Verizon Conferencing provided a teleconference
circuit to bridge the gap from Earth station VK4KHZ in Australia to Sweden.

Among other things, the grade 5 through 9 students wanted to know if birds
can fly in the microgravity of the ISS, how the ISS crew disposes of its
trash, whether crew members have to wear spacesuits all the time, if they
saw flashes of light in their vision due to cosmic rays and did Fuglesang
believe there was intelligent life in space.

For the contact, which attracted generous media coverage -- including TV and
newspaper reports -- students wore shirts bearing a special logo
commemorating the contact. Bertels said the students who took part in the
contact plan to sign one of the shirts and present it personally to
Fuglesang when he's back on Earth. Fuglesang arrived aboard the ISS as part
of the shuttle Discovery STS-116 crew. Discovery returned December 22.

ARISS <http://www.rac.ca/ariss> is an international educational outreach,
with US participation by ARRL, AMSAT and NASA.

==>STRAIGHT KEY NIGHT IS JANUARY 1, 2007 (UTC)

ARRL once again will sponsor Straight Key Night (SKN)
<http://www.arrl.org/contests/rules/2007/skn.html> starting at 0000 UTC
January 1 (New Year's Eve in US time zones) and continuing for the next 24
hours.

SKN is *not* a contest. It's an opportunity for CW enthusiasts -- veterans
or novices -- to dust off their straight keys and enjoy socializing and "rag
chewing" on the air. Some 350 participants posted entries for SKN 2006. SKN
2007 entries via e-mail <straightkey@arrl.org> or to SKN, ARRL, 225 Main St,
Newington, CT 06111 must be received by January 31, 2007.

"Best Fist" and "Most Interesting QSO" votes will appear in April 2007 QST.
"Soapbox" posts <http://www.arrl.org/contests/soapbox/> also are welcome.

During the same time period, AMSAT invites radio amateurs worldwide to
participate in Straight Key Night on OSCAR 2007. The AMSAT event is
dedicated to the memory of Cliff Buttschardt, K7RR, an enthusiastic and
longtime SKN participant on both OSCAR and HF.

No rules, no scoring and no logs, AMSAT says. Just operate CW through any
OSCAR between 0000 and 2400 UTC on 1 January 2007 using a straight key.

SKN on OSCAR 2007 participants also may nominate a "Best Fist" from among
stations worked. Nominations go to Ray Soifer, W2RS <w2rs@amsat.org>. A list
of nominees will appear in AMSAT News Service and in The AMSAT Journal.

==>SOLAR UPDATE

Propagation prognosticator Tad "Who Let the Spots Out?" Cook, K7RA, Seattle,
Washington, reports: More stormy space weather showed up this week! At the
same time, sunspot activity was lower. Average daily sunspot numbers dropped
17 points to 10.4 for December 14-20, but on December 15, the planetary A
index -- an indicator of global geomagnetic activity from magnetometers
around the globe -- rose to 104. That's a very high number and indicates a
severe geomagnetic storm.

The cause was a large coronal mass ejection (CME) that happened to be
Earth-directed. It arrived on December 14, and aurora borealis -- the
northern lights -- were visible as far south as Arizona. During the hours of
darkness in North America December 14 and 15, the planetary K index rose to
eight for three successive three-hour periods. That's very big.

A paper, "Geomagnetic activity indicates a large amplitude for sunspot cycle
24" <http://tinyurl.com/yewboz> presented at the fall meeting of the
American Geophysical Union, proposes that the next sunspot cycle could be
one of the most intense ever seen. Also, see "The World Above 50 MHz" in
December 2006 and January 2007 QST.

Currently we've seen several days of zero sunspots. Expect few or no
sunspots over the short term and planetary A indices December 22-27 of 15,
15, 10, 5, 5 and 15. The next predicted period of higher geomagnetic
activity is around January 2, with a planetary A index of 25.

Sunspot numbers for December 14 through 20 were 23, 19, 20, 11, 0, 0 and 0,
with a mean of 10.4. The 10.7 cm flux was 93.4, 87.1, 82.3, 81.3, 74.7,
72.9, and 71.5, with a mean of 80.5. Estimated planetary A indices were 63,
104, 11, 4, 8, 14 and 24, with a mean of 32.6. Estimated mid-latitude A
indices were 30, 48, 10, 3, 7, 9 and 16, with a mean of 17.6.

For more information concerning radio propagation, visit the ARRL Technical
Information Service Propagation page
<http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/propagation.html>.

____

==>IN BRIEF:

* This weekend on the radio: The RAEM Contest is December 24. The DARC
Christmas Contest is December 26. The RAC Winter Contest is December 30. The
Feld Hell QSO Party and the Stew Perry Topband Challenge are the weekend of
December 30-31. The SARTG New Year RTTY Contest, the AGCW Happy New Year
Contest, the AGCW VHF/UHF Contest are January 1, 2007. The ARS Spartan
Sprint is January 2. The ARRL RTTY Roundup, the Original QRP Contest and the
EUCW 160-Meter Contest are the January 6-7 weekend. ARRL Kid's Day is
Sunday, January 7. See the ARRL Contest Branch page
<http://www.arrl.org/contests/> and the WA7BNM Contest Calendar
<http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/index.html> for more info.

* ARRL Certification and Continuing Education course registration:
Registration remains open through Sunday, January 7, for these on-line
courses beginning Friday, January 19. Amateur Radio Emergency Communications
Level 2 (EC-002), Amateur Radio Emergency Communications Level 3 (EC-003R2),
Antenna Modeling (EC-004), HF Digital Communications (EC-005), VHF/UHF --
Life Beyond the Repeater (EC-008), and Radio Frequency Propagation (EC-011).
These courses will also open for registration Friday, January 5, for classes
beginning Sunday, February 18. To learn more, visit the CCE Course Listing
page <http://www.arrl.org/cce/courses.html> or contact the CCE Department
<cce@arrl.org>.

* ARRL Kids Day is Sunday, January 7: The next chance to provide youngsters
with a fun, hands-on radio experience is Sunday, January 7, when the first
ARRL Kids Day of the new year takes place
<http://www.arrl.org/FandES/ead/kd-rules.html>. ARRL Education and
Technology Program Coordinator Mark Spencer, WA8SME, offers some Kids Day
2007 thoughts and suggestions on p 45 of December QST. Kids Day begins at
1800 UTC and continues until 2400 UTC. There's no limit on operating time.
Suggested exchanges are first name, age, location and favorite color.
Suggested frequencies are 14.270 to 14.300 MHz, 21.380 to 21.400 MHz and
28.350 to 28.400 MHz, plus local VHF repeaters with the sponsor's
permission. Licensees should observe third-party traffic restrictions when
making DX contacts
<http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/io/3rdparty.html>. These apply
when unlicensed individuals communicate via ham radio.

* AO-51 "Echo" is now carrier-access: AO-51 "Echo" satellite users no longer
need to transmit a 67-Hz CTCSS subaudible tone to enable the satellite's
transponder. AMSAT Vice President of Operations Drew Glasbrenner, KO4MA,
reports AO-51 is now a carrier-access satellite. The change was aimed at
improving worldwide access to AO-51, especially from those areas where
CTCSS-equipped transceivers are less common. Check the AO-51 operating
schedule <http://www.amsat.org/amsat-new/echo/ControlTeam.php> *before*
using the satellite! -- AMSAT News Service

* New DX record claimed for 300+ GHz "traditional RF" operation: Microwave
enthuiasts Brian Justin, WA1ZMS, and Pete Lascell, W4WWQ, in Virginia are
claiming a new DX record for "traditional RF operation above 300 GHz." The
December 10 QSO on 322 GHz spanned 7.3 km (4.53 miles) and was accomplished
using slow-speed FSK CW and Spectran software. "This latest QSO exceeds our
former DX of 1.4 km (0.87 mile) as well as makes a claim for best DX on any
amateur frequency above 300 GHz, except for visible light," said Justin, who
also welcomes competition on the millimeter wavelengths. "I hope other hams
come to know that the bands above 47 GHz are ripe for the picking when it
comes to DX and other firsts."

* New 2-meter EME world record claimed: Moonbounce enthusiasts in New
Zealand and Portugal are claiming a new EME (Earth-Moon-Earth) distance
record on 2 meters. The December 6 contact, using digital JT65B mode, was
between Nick Wallace, ZL1IU, in New Zealand (RF64vr) and Joe Kraft,
CT1HZE/DL8HCZ, (IM57nh) in Portugal. Wallace was running 500 W to 4-by-12
Yagis, while Kraft was putting 1.5 kW into 4-by-11 Yagis. The EME contact
spanned a terrestrial distance of 19,685 km (12,204 mi).

* Reminder: "Beijing model 1" IRCs expire at year's end: Check any
International Reply Coupons (IRCs) <http://www.upu.int/irc/en/> you've got
on hand for an expiration date! As of January 1, 2002, UPU-issued IRCs bear
expiration dates, after which the coupons *have no value*. The so-called
"Beijing model 1" IRC expires on December 31. The newest IRC, the "Beijing
model 2," expires December 31, 2009. Many DXers still use IRCs, issued by
the Universal Postal Union (UPU) <http://www.upu.int/index.html>, to cover
return postage for QSL cards. The UPU says IRCs are exchangeable in all
member countries for the minimum postage of a priority item or an
unregistered air mail letter sent to a foreign country. An IRC costs $1.85
in the US. Although US post offices are not obliged to sell IRCs, it is
mandatory for post offices in UPU member countries to *exchange* the
coupons.

* Dale Hatfield, W0IFO, named Spectrum Advisory Committee chairman: ARRL
member Dale Hatfield, W0IFO, of Boulder, Colorado, has been named to chair
the Commerce Department's Spectrum Advisory Committee
<http://www.ntia.doc.gov/advisory/spectrum/index.html>. The former chief of
the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology, Hatfield now is an
independent consultant and adjunct professor in the University of Colorado
Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program. The Commerce Spectrum Advisory
Committee is part of the President's Spectrum Policy Initiative.

* Angus Tait, ZL3NL, is 2006 Fred M. Link Award winner: The Radio Club of
America (RCA) has honored Sir Angus Tait, ZL3NL, as the recipient of the
2006 Fred M. Link (W2ALU) Award. The RCA recognized Tait "for his
substantial contributions to the advancement and development of land mobile
radio and communications." The managing director of Tait Electronics in
Christchurch, New Zealand, Tait, 87, was unable to attend RCA's awards
banquet in mid-November, and Tait Communications President Bill Fredrickson
accepted the award in his stead. -- Don Bishop, W0WO, provided some
information for this report

* We stand corrected! In The ARRL Letter, Vol 25, No 49 (Dec 15, 2006), the
news brief "New Jersey club boosts Spectrum Defense Fund" contained
incorrect information. Hudson Division Assistant Director Jim Joyce, K2ZO,
filled in for Bergen Amateur Radio Association (BARA) President Tony Izzo,
K2AMI, who could not make the trip to ARRL Headquarters. The news brief
"Radio Club of America honors Frank Clement" should have said: Clement
worked for Hughes Aircraft and was part of the engineering team that
designed and built the Hughes Flying Boat (the HK-1 Hercules), the "Spruce
Goose."

================================================== =========
The ARRL Letter is published Fridays, 50 times each year, by the American
Radio Relay League: ARRL--the National Association For Amateur Radio, 225
Main St, Newington, CT 06111; tel 860-594-0200; fax 860-594-0259;
<http://www.arrl.org>. Joel Harrison, W5ZN, President.

The ARRL Letter offers a weekly e-mail digest of essential and general news
of interest to active radio amateurs. Visit the ARRL Web site
<http://www.arrl.org> for the latest Amateur Radio news and news updates.
The ARRL Web site <http://www.arrl.org/> also offers informative features
and columns. ARRL Audio News <http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/audio/> is a
weekly "ham radio newscast" compiled and edited from The ARRL Letter. It's
also available as a podcast from our Web site.

Material from The ARRL Letter may be republished or reproduced in whole or
in part in any form without additional permission. Credit must be given to
The ARRL Letter/American Radio Relay League.

==>Delivery problems (ARRL member direct delivery only!):
letter-dlvy@arrl.org
==>Editorial questions or comments: Rick Lindquist, N1RL, n1rl@arrl.org
==>ARRL News on the Web: <http://www.arrl.org>
==>ARRL Audio News: <http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/audio/> or call
860-594-0384

==>How to Get The ARRL Letter

The ARRL Letter is available to ARRL members free of charge directly from
ARRL HQ. To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your address for e-mail
delivery:
ARRL members first must register on the Members Only Web Site
<http://www.arrl.org/members/>. You'll have an opportunity during
registration to sign up for e-mail delivery of The ARRL Letter, W1AW
bulletins, and other material. To change these selections--including
delivery of The ARRL Letter--registered members should click on the "Member
Data Page" link (in the Members Only box). Click on "Modify membership
data," check or uncheck the appropriate boxes and/or change your e-mail
address if necessary. (Check "Temporarily disable all automatically sent
email" to temporarily stop all e-mail deliveries.) Then, click on "Submit
modification" to make selections effective. (NOTE: HQ staff members cannot
change your e-mail delivery address. You must do this yourself via the
Members Only Web Site.)

The ARRL Letter also is available to all, free of charge, from these
sources:

* ARRLWeb <http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/>. (NOTE: The ARRL Letter will be
posted each Friday when it is distributed via e-mail.)

* The QTH.net listserver, thanks to volunteers from the Boston Amateur Radio
Club: Visit Mailing Lists@QTH.Net
<http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/letter-list>. (NOTE: The ARRL
cannot assist subscribers who receive The ARRL Letter via this listserver.)

ka0zlg
12-23-2006, 06:02 PM
Well it is here, I am happy that the fuss is over with about code or no code. I see it this way, for those of you that have it you can say been there, done that and you have the paper to say so, some of you may even have the T-shirt to show it. Remember you have something they do not. So lets all welcome the new HFers and help them out with what they need. remember they learn by example just like you and I, you were new at this at one time also.
Have a nice holiday season
73
Mike
KA0ZLG

AD7BK
12-23-2006, 06:54 PM
Well I for one will welcome the change, and I will help the new Generals (from the result of the change maybe everyone will upgrade and the bands will be full) out by welcoming them to the world of HF. I remember the magic of HF specially when I talked to Sweeden SM5IMO for over a half hour on 20m at NIGHT I could hear him he could hear me. I need to get my antenna up to the top of the tallest tree here so I can get out on 20m http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

David

n0dne
12-23-2006, 08:25 PM
I am very proud to be an Extra-Lite! #My T-Shirt just happens to be small. #I was happy to be a 5 wpm Tech and talk in my little 200 KHz world on 10 meters. #It took me almost 4 months of practicing 6-8 hours a day. #I passed my code test with the bare minimum... 25 characters. #Based on my trials and tribulations with 5 wpm, I knew I would never get the 13 wpm I needed to get my General. #

When I found out the Morse requirement dropped to 5 wpm I got my General and started working those privileges and have had a wonderful time. #Last month I got off my dead b... and earned the coveted Amateur Extra license I had been dreaming about for 36 years. #Started working those privleges and found almost no one there. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif #

I know several hams who have taken their General and Amateur Extra written tests and struggled with even getting 5 wpm. #I, too, look forward to talking to those Generals and Amateur Extras who struggled trying get 5 wpm.

Welcome, Welcome, Welcome http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif

Have a great holiday!

73, Joel, n0dne

wa4mqw
12-23-2006, 08:27 PM
Like others have said, I am glad the debate is over and hope our hobby will grow to new levels of activity and intelligence with more respect given to each other on all frequencies. CW was dead long ago for some and now it will not be used as a hammer and equated to innate intelligence. I will always cherish the thousands of great QSOs over the past 43 years using mostly CW and hope all hams feel the same no matter what their preferred mode of operation is. I hope that all future hams will learn and appreciate the part that CW played in the history of communications around the world since it was invented by Samual F.B. Morse and Alfred Vail in 1832. It changed the world. I am proud to have been an Amateur Radio Operator that developed a fair amount of proficiency in the art of CW.

73 to all and let us welcome all hams without requard to their preferred mode.

Bob

WA4MQW

KE4BFK
12-23-2006, 08:53 PM
Take a chill pill.
Its a great hobby for meeting other people from diffrent cultures throughout the world and a great help in emergency situations.
This hobby has needed a boost for quite awhile now.
I am still waiting to see a commercial advertisment from the A.R.R.L. durning the superbowl asking for new hams to join the ranks.
I am a 20 wpm extra and I am not suprised to see this change.
Morse code will not die but we still must protect our vhf and uhf Freq's. from commercial intrests.
If any newbie wants to learn code I for one will slow down and help with a NEW mode of communication to the newbie.
One must crawl before they can walk and before you know it they will be running,but not without skinned knees.
I know my opinion is in the minority,but what is done is done,now we must help grow the seeds that have been sown.
I just hope that in a few years we have a great harvest.
It will only happen if WE ALL PULL AND WORK TOGETHER and welcome these newbies on the HF bands.
Give back to the hobby we all enjoy.
Be a leader and give a helping hand to the one that is asking for it.
This will be my last comment on this matter.
Thanks to everyone that has read my comments even though everyone don't agree with my comments.I hold no grudges.
I just hope band conditions get better and we can all get along.
I wish you all a MERRY CHRISTMAS and HAPPY NEW YEAR.
I hope to catch you all on the bands.
73
John
KE4BFK


http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

KE4BFK
12-23-2006, 09:01 PM
Let's all make straight key night a "Night to Remember".
Just like the Titanic.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif #http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

WT0A
12-23-2006, 09:58 PM
Let's see, what was this thread about? Oh yeah, AO51, ares/races, swedish from space, SKN, w1aw hello, fessenden special event, BPL, solar update,and about thirty other items but the only thing commented about is code which has already been beat far beyond death in many other treads.
Glen

w5klb
12-23-2006, 10:33 PM
Quote[/b] ]"We . . . believe that the public interest is not served by requiring facility in Morse code when the trend in amateur communications is to use voice and digital technologies for exchanging messages," the FCC said in its R&O.

Silly me... I always thought Morse was a "digital technology". Oh well, live and learn.

KC0OFZ
12-23-2006, 10:43 PM
ARRL CEO David Sumner, K1ZZ, expressed a similar viewpoint. "Now that the
debate is over, we can focus on learning Morse code simply for its own
sake," he said. Sumner pledged that the League would maintain its
traditional support of Morse code as an operating mode and would continue to
offer Morse training materials as well as such incentives as bonus credit
for CW contacts in ARRL-sponsored operating events. ARRL's Hiram Percy Maxim
Memorial Station W1AW will keep its schedule of Morse code practice and
bulletin transmissions.

I doubt this to be true. Lets see about 2 years from now when at least one or more written tests is gone and he wants to ELIMINATE CW bulletins and practice just to continue his pandering. The league is a sell out and will not stop now.

ab8ma
12-23-2006, 10:49 PM
Quote[/b] (k0qhh @ Dec. 23 2006,21:58)]Let's see, what was this thread about? Oh yeah, AO51, ares/races, swedish from space, SKN, w1aw hello, fessenden special event, BPL, solar update,and about thirty other items but the only #thing commented about is code which has already been beat far beyond death in many other treads.
Glen
You beat me to it. The first thing I did was search for the solar prediction. The code thing is old news, no??

wa3vjb
12-23-2006, 11:06 PM
It will be interesting to see whether Joe Carcia can figure out how to get the Harris commercial transmitter on AM as part of the Fessenden commemoration.

Sumner once denied the thing had AM capability as he tried to avoid the question of W!AW's use of an incompatible mode for its broadcasts on an AM Calling Frequency recognized by the ARRL.

But, best wishes that they may operate as many AM Tall Ships as will be on for the Heavy Metal Rally that same weekend, as well as the sort of success noted with the AM Bandwarming Party last weekend as reported on Amateur Radio Newsline.

Sound file below.
About 5 megs, MP3, includes a lot of great-sounding AM.

Catch you on the airwaves.

Paul/VJB
AM BANDWARMING PARTY !! The full report. (http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=9220.0;id=1501)


HEAVY METAL RALLY 2006 - Details !!! (http://amfone.net/Amforum/index.php?topic=9284.0)

KE7HQY
12-23-2006, 11:42 PM
Quote[/b] ]"I'm fairly certain every local ARES/RACES team in Western Washington was activated."
Speaking as a member of the Kirkland, Washington (5 mi east of Seattle) ARES team we were not deployed, however we most certainly were put on standby. Cell phones still worked and some telephone lines still were operational, so I am guessing City managers/Fire dept. personnel could still comunicate effectively enough. Kirkland EOC (Emergency Operations Center at the city hall) was placed on standby Thursday afternoon just in case. HOWEVER, there were many cities which faired far worse than Kirkland, and so they most definitely needed ARES.

KD5OEI
12-24-2006, 03:19 AM
Perhaps something more important (than the code issue itself) to focus on is the BPL issue in the letter.

"==>ARRL CHALLENGES FCC DISMISSAL OF VIRGINIA BPL INTERFERENCE COMPLAINTS

The FCC has told five Manassas, Virginia, radio amateurs that its testing
showed the city's BPL system complies with FCC Part 15 rules, and..."

Whether or not the FCC is aware of, or using as a distraction, the hubub that the Morse code issue has caused, the suggestion is that we are perhaps not paying attention to some of the more troublesome issues like BPL. BPL interference will ruin things for almost everyone, even the poor SWLers.

To think that the FCC will simply dismiss the comments and concerns made by ostensibly competent ham ops in favor of an interference-causing business - this should be a good point to take note of.

n8ag
12-24-2006, 03:27 AM
Sorry to see the CW requirement go. Those who never use CW will miss a lot of contacts they could have made. Let's be real about this, 5 WPM is not difficult, period. This just falls in line will the on-going reduction of the theory portion of amateur exams. It all sadly boils down to economics. The more people who get their license begets more ham equipment sold which, in turn, begets more QST & CQ ads and subscriptions and more members for the ARRL.

N7PLC
12-24-2006, 07:56 AM
Let the crying begin

VE7RFH
12-24-2006, 08:17 AM
Quote[/b] (w5klb @ Dec. 23 2006,15:33)]Quote[/b] ]"We . . . believe that the public interest is not served by requiring facility in Morse code when the trend in amateur communications is to use voice and digital technologies for exchanging messages," the FCC said in its R&O.

Silly me... I always thought Morse was a "digital technology". Oh well, live and learn.
Morse Code is merely the language used for the communication, it happens that the medium most commonly used in the ham bands for commuicating in Morse Code is the interupting a continuous wave of RF but it can also be transmitted using audio tones or flashing a light. Any number of different codes can be used in the same manner, CW is not exclusive to the language of Morse Code.

kb9sri
12-24-2006, 11:55 AM
this is still dumb no matter what anyone thinks...if you dont like my comment you can kiss my cb radio backside...welcome to hf you you lazy welfare sucking people...

W5IEI
12-24-2006, 01:16 PM
Quote[/b] (kb9sri @ Dec. 24 2006,04:55)]this is still dumb no matter what anyone thinks...if you dont like my comment you can kiss my cb radio backside...welcome to hf you you lazy welfare sucking people...
Yes,
I'd rather see BPL take out the bands than the welfare Generals!!!

m1wml
12-24-2006, 02:09 PM
This has got to be a step in the right direction for u.s. teck ham radio operators specialy.. it,s been gone here for a few years now and has been very succsesful here in the uk.. and to all those old time hams who are finding it hard to except. trust me it will be worth it in the long run.. i will be looking out for you tech,s so you have been warned...

K4JF
12-24-2006, 02:21 PM
Quote[/b] (w5klb @ Dec. 22 2006,16:33)]Silly me... I always thought Morse was a "digital technology". Oh well, live and learn.
It is. Now you've learned something! :o)

K4JF
12-24-2006, 02:24 PM
Quote[/b] (KD5OEI @ Dec. 22 2006,21:19)]Perhaps something more important (than the code issue itself) to focus on is the BPL issue in the letter.

"==>ARRL CHALLENGES FCC DISMISSAL OF VIRGINIA BPL INTERFERENCE COMPLAINTS

The FCC has told five Manassas, Virginia, radio amateurs that its testing
showed the city's BPL system complies with FCC Part 15 rules, and..."

Whether or not the FCC is aware of, or using as a distraction, the hubub that the Morse code issue has caused, the suggestion is that we are perhaps not paying attention to some of the more troublesome issues like BPL. BPL interference will ruin things for almost everyone, even the poor SWLers.

To think that the FCC will simply dismiss the comments and concerns made by ostensibly competent ham ops in favor of an interference-causing business - this should be a good point to take note of.
Correct. BPL is a far more serious threat to ham (and all other HF) radio than whether we test for code or not.

N5FOG
12-24-2006, 05:51 PM
Quote[/b] (K4JF @ Dec. 23 2006,09:24)]Quote[/b] (KD5OEI @ Dec. 22 2006,21:19)]Perhaps something more important (than the code issue itself) to focus on is the BPL issue in the letter.

"==>ARRL CHALLENGES FCC DISMISSAL OF VIRGINIA BPL INTERFERENCE COMPLAINTS

The FCC has told five Manassas, Virginia, radio amateurs that its testing
showed the city's BPL system complies with FCC Part 15 rules, and..."

Whether or not the FCC is aware of, or using as a distraction, the hubub that the Morse code issue has caused, the suggestion is that we are perhaps not paying attention to some of the more troublesome issues like BPL. BPL interference will ruin things for almost everyone, even the poor SWLers.

To think that the FCC will simply dismiss the comments and concerns made by ostensibly competent ham ops in favor of an interference-causing business - this should be a good point to take note of.
Correct. BPL is a far more serious threat to ham (and all other HF) radio than whether we test for code or not.
That’s one thing I've noticed, the old timers are fighting the code issue 10 times harder than the BPL issue. The older timers are so concerned about someone getting on HF for a little less than they did. And they would rather put all their effort into fighting the new comers instead of worrying about the beast that could very well KILL THE HF SPECTRUM.

And that “I'd rather see BPL take out the bands than the welfare Generals” is nothing but a selfish attitude that shows your true concern isn’t ham radio just your own ego.


Eric Kc5Fog

WA5BEN
12-24-2006, 07:54 PM
Quote[/b] (KC0OFZ @ Dec. 23 2006,15:43)]ARRL CEO David Sumner, K1ZZ, expressed a similar viewpoint. "Now that the
debate is over, we can focus on learning Morse code simply for its own
sake," he said. Sumner pledged that the League would maintain its
traditional support of Morse code as an operating mode and would continue to
offer Morse training materials as well as such incentives as bonus credit
for CW contacts in ARRL-sponsored operating events. ARRL's Hiram Percy Maxim
Memorial Station W1AW will keep its schedule of Morse code practice and
bulletin transmissions.

I doubt this to be true. Lets see about 2 years from now when at least one or more written tests is gone and he wants to ELIMINATE CW bulletins and practice just to continue his pandering. The league is a sell out and will not stop now.
It always strikes me as funny when the loudest complaints against the ARRL come from those relatively newly licensed.

Were it not for the ARRL, these relative newcomers probably would not have bands to use -- and most certainly would not have the NEW bands.

There is little to be learned from CW operation. The primary learning potential is simply getting a circuit to transmit -- and that, only if one actually builds a simple transmitter.

CW is of little use in any real emergency or disaster scenario. (In point of fact, there is no documented use of CW in an emergency or disaster for at least two decades.) Newer technologies exist that have both greater information carriage rates and more technical education capabilities.

CW is retained in the amateur service (and in no other service) simply because it is a mode that some prefer to use at least some of the time. Yes, it is an historic mode. Yes, it should be retained for those who wish to use it.

CW does not "qualify" any person to be a good operator. There is NO test that can do that. Conversely, the lack of CW does not "disqualify" them -- or in any way make the less of an operator. Only the ACTIONS of the operator after they are licensed will show whether he/she is a "true ham".

When any person chooses to get a license, he/she accepts an obligation to:

Treat other licensees with respect -- both on and off the air.

Assist other operators when possible.

Accept positive criticism so that he/she can grow as an operator.

Act at all times in a manner that is a credit to the amateur radio service.

Offer his/her skills, equipment, and time to assist his/her community.

I have been licensed almost 45 years. I wish that I could say that I have always lived up to these obligations. Like all of us, I am sometimes all too human. The important thing that distinguishes a "true ham" is that the "true ham" never stops trying to be a better ham -- and a better person.

kb9sri
12-24-2006, 09:22 PM
bpl is not the problem doing away with mores code is just dumbing down america if that is your worry bpl? smart hams will fix that
...........

kc0jez
12-24-2006, 10:23 PM
The Jetson Effect

There are several things you can say about me, but for this discussion we’ll just consider a few: I have too many hobbies. I read too much. I love new technology, and I yearn for doing things the “old fashioned way”.

I enjoy many hobbies. Electronics, photography, music, computers and aviation just to name a few. And I avidly read publications relating to these subjects. But I also read old publications. I have a basement full of QST and Ham Radio, and 73 magazines, some dating back to the 1940’s. I have an attic full of aviation magazines going back at least that far. Photography magazines from the last 70 years are strewn about the house.

With these materials at hand I have a pretty good grasp of the advancements made in the art of the subjects over the years. Heck, I even personally use the various levels of technology represented. I have a digital camera, a current computer, an advanced digital multitrack recording system, a small handheld multi-band ham radio. But I also have manual typewriters, reel to reel tape recorders, completely manual film cameras, and radio gear chock full of tubes. We’ve begun construction of an all aluminum high performance aircraft, and at the same time are preparing to build a wood and fabric plane as well. So I know first hand how the technology has changed in these areas.

Here’s what puzzles me. Near as I can tell, since the beginning of time (although I have no caveman era magazines to document this) the human race has striven to make whatever we want to do easier. The dishwasher, the electric can opener, the power sander, the electric garage door opener, the list is actually endless. But when technology advances within what we might call an art, or skill, those already practicing the vocation hate and resist the new technology, and it seems to be true in any area of this type. I can pull out photo magazines where fiery letters to the editor are advising that photos taken using a new fangled device called a “light meter” should be banned from photo contests. That these devices would ruin photography, can not be relied upon for accurate readings, could not possibly prove more accurate than the human eye, and should be scorned. Pick up any photo magazine of the past few years and read the digital vs. film debates that rage on. If you’re not using film, it’s not photography, doncha know!

It used to take a whole studio full of equipment to make a good multitrack recording. Remember, the Beatles did the Sergeant Pepper album on a 4 track recorder! Then along came 8 tracks, 16 tracks, 32 tracks, 1 inch wide tape, 2 inch tape, noise reduction, 30 ips tape speeds, and the list goes on. Huge mixing boards, racks of effects, pre-amps, processors and blinking devices. Now, in one small unit on my desktop I have a nearly unlimited number of tracks and effects at my disposal and can create amazing things that used to take lots of space and cash to accomplish. This of course angers the audio gods since now lowly scum can do what THEY do without spending the time, money and sweat to reach the same result. Somehow, taking advantage of the new technology makes the result less valid because the necessary pain wasn’t inflicted on the way.

The latest example of this is happening in the amateur “ham” radio ranks. The Federal Communications Commission has finally removed the need to learn Morse code for access to the choice high frequency part of the radio spectrum. Many hams who have been at it for years now consider those who get a license today to be less of an operator because they don’t have to learn the Morse code. The new young radio operators, in the meantime, rejoice as they are no longer required to learn to operate t his one particular radio mode, that dates back over 100 years, to prove their ability to “advance the art of radio”. Another debate over changes with the times that has turned ugly complete with some nasty and degrading name calling. Today these debates also take advantage of other new technologies as now the differing sides can debate publicly and world wide with the new-fangled internet! Sadly, for some, the debate never dies.

Believe me, there are many things I enjoy doing the old fashioned way. I love to fire up my Heathkit regenerative radio and tune in shortwave stations on a set I built myself with solder, and tubes, and point to point wiring. I shoot with my digital camera, then pull out a 50’s era roll film job, shoot black and white film, and develop[p it in my own darkroom. I love playing vinyl albums. I enjoy the harmonic distortion and warmth of analog audio. The last time we had a power outage at work, I still got my work done because I pulled out a manual typewriter from under my desk, finished my writing, and went home on time while everyone else had to finish up on their computers after the juice came back on. Still, at the same time I embrace and enjoy the modern technologies that make my diversions easier and the final results better.

I call if the Jetson Effect. The Chefs of old would be appalled at the instant pushbutton meals served up by Rosie the Robot! Everything the Jetsons needed to do seemed to be done for them by some automated gadget of some sort. Ahh, but poor George Jetson... He missed dinner. He was in the attic looking for the slide projector.

WA4III
12-24-2006, 11:03 PM
Quote[/b] (W5IEI @ Dec. 24 2006,06:16)]Quote[/b] (kb9sri @ Dec. 24 2006,04:55)]this is still dumb no matter what anyone thinks...if you dont like my comment you can kiss my cb radio backside...welcome to hf you you lazy welfare sucking people...
Yes,
I'd rather see BPL take out the bands than the welfare Generals!!!
I got my Extra Class License when the 20 WPM rule was in effect. I don't feel that I am any better than anyone else. It don't matter is you are a 5, 13, 20, or a NO CODE extra, everyone that has complied with the FCC's rules and requirements have equal rights on the band, or sub band they are licensed to operate.

The above comments are not HAM like and represent a minority of the HAM community. If you have nothing to do but bicker over the issue which you didn't have the time or nerve to write the FCC and oppose the issue or more so if you were to cheap to buy the stamp, get you a cheap CB and get on channel 23 where you obviously belong.

As far as the no coders, I welcome you. If I can be of assistance, I will try to help.

For the old HAMs lets pull together and help the new commers become good operators. Lets extend the good friendship hand to them and help them in their transition to amateur radio.

I know you grippers are a minority because of the number of letters to the FCC in opposition to the elimination of the code requirement. If you wish to continue your CW operation, feel free to do so. In your sub band, the "no coders" will not bother you.

WELCOME TO ALL

de WA4III

N2MMM
12-24-2006, 11:52 PM
Quote[/b] (W5IEI @ Dec. 24 2006,06:16)]Quote[/b] (kb9sri @ Dec. 24 2006,04:55)]this is still dumb no matter what anyone thinks...if you dont like my comment you can kiss my cb radio backside...welcome to hf you you lazy welfare sucking people...
Yes,
I'd rather see BPL take out the bands than the welfare Generals!!!
You're not a ham, you're a pig. Turn in your ticket LOSER.

N7YA
12-25-2006, 01:29 AM
Quote[/b] (ab8ma @ Dec. 23 2006,15:49)]Quote[/b] (k0qhh @ Dec. 23 2006,21:58)]Let's see, what was this thread about? Oh yeah, AO51, ares/races, swedish from space, SKN, w1aw hello, fessenden special event, BPL, solar update,and about thirty other items but the only #thing commented about is code which has already been beat far beyond death in many other treads.
Glen
You beat me to it. The first thing I did was search for the solar prediction. The code thing is old news, no??
Same here...Solar forecast. Its more important to me to know what the conditions are looking like since i actually get on the air.

The code debate is stale...has been for years.

73...Adam, N7YA

kc8vpx
12-25-2006, 03:25 AM
Quote[/b] (N2MMM @ Dec. 24 2006,18:52)]Quote[/b] (W5IEI @ Dec. 24 2006,06:16)]Quote[/b] (kb9sri @ Dec. 24 2006,04:55)]this is still dumb no matter what anyone thinks...if you dont like my comment you can kiss my cb radio backside...welcome to hf you you lazy welfare sucking people...
Yes,
I'd rather see BPL take out the bands than the welfare Generals!!!
You're not a ham, you're a pig. Turn in your ticket LOSER.
***DITTO*** I can't believe he would talk to his friends like that-that are not hams. Everyone of us hams know someone that does not have interest in this hobby. These kind of people are the ones who are responsible for all of the bickering about Morse Code.

kc5oua
12-25-2006, 10:34 AM
Quote[/b] (WA4III @ Dec. 24 2006,16:03)]Quote[/b] (W5IEI @ Dec. 24 2006,06:16)]Quote[/b] (kb9sri @ Dec. 24 2006,04:55)]this is still dumb no matter what anyone thinks...if you dont like my comment you can kiss my cb radio backside...welcome to hf you you lazy welfare sucking people...
Yes,
I'd rather see BPL take out the bands than the welfare Generals!!!
I got my Extra Class License when the 20 WPM rule was in effect. I don't feel that I am any better than anyone else. It don't matter is you are a 5, 13, 20, or a NO CODE extra, everyone that has complied with the FCC's rules and requirements have equal rights on the band, or sub band they are licensed to operate.

The above comments are not HAM like and represent a minority of the HAM community. If you have nothing to do but bicker over the issue which you didn't have the time or nerve to write the FCC and oppose the issue or more so if you were to cheap to buy the stamp, get you a cheap CB and get on channel 23 where you obviously belong.

As far as the no coders, I welcome you. If I can be of assistance, I will try to help.

For the old HAMs lets pull together and help the new commers become good operators. Lets extend the good friendship hand to them and help them in their transition to amateur radio.

I know you grippers are a minority because of the number of letters to the FCC in opposition to the elimination of the code requirement. If you wish to continue your CW operation, feel free to do so. In your sub band, the "no coders" will not bother you.

WELCOME TO ALL

de WA4III
Thanks

More people should be like you, hope to speak with you soon on hf....

KC5OUA

KE7JFA
12-25-2006, 02:34 PM
Quote[/b] (kb9sri @ Dec. 24 2006,04:55)]this is still dumb no matter what anyone thinks...if you dont like my comment you can kiss my cb radio backside...welcome to hf you you lazy welfare sucking people...
That's nice of you to say dirtbag.
You must be one of the idiots on 75 meter that cuss and swear and act like an fool. (or is 75 meter cb?)
I have a job, new car I PAY FOR, a house I PAY FOR, bills I PAY FOR and you have the nerve to call us "welfare" cases?
If you were in front of me, I would give you a horse whipping you would never forget.

ke6oud
12-25-2006, 04:34 PM
Quote[/b] (kb9sri @ Dec. 24 2006,04:55)]this is still dumb no matter what anyone thinks...if you dont like my comment you can kiss my cb radio backside...welcome to hf you you lazy welfare sucking people...
That is really mature for a 40 year old man.....

WA5BEN
12-25-2006, 05:45 PM
Quote[/b] (kb9sri @ Dec. 24 2006,14:22)]bpl is not the problem doing away with mores code is just dumbing down america if that is your worry bpl? smart hams will fix that
...........
BPL is a real and present danger. One must be technologically ignorant to believe that effective countermeasures are possible on the receiving side.

Even if CW disappeared from the ham bands (which it will not in the foreseeable future), there would be ZERO impact upon amateur radio. CW is a MODE. It is neither vital to the amateur radio service nor important as a test element.

KE7JFA
12-25-2006, 07:46 PM
[QUOTE]As far as the no coders, I welcome you. If I can be of assistance, I will try to help.

For the old HAMs lets pull together and help the new commers become good operators. Lets extend the good friendship hand to them and help them in their transition to amateur radio.

I know you grippers are a minority because of the number of letters to the FCC in opposition to the elimination of the code requirement. If you wish to continue your CW operation, feel free to do so. In your sub band, the "no coders" will not bother you.

WELCOME TO ALL

de WA4III

Well said and appreciated. If all HF'ers are like you, it will be a rather pleasant experience.
Thanks again! See ya on HF soon!

n1dvj
12-25-2006, 07:50 PM
Quote[/b] (W5IEI @ Dec. 24 2006,06:16)]Yes,
I'd rather see BPL take out the bands than the welfare Generals!!!
Fortunately for the rest of us, attitudes like this won't matter. For it WILL be the new Generals and above who will inhabit the bands, and voices like this won't have any say in it and can pretty much be ignored.

And BPL will be 'solved'. Maybe not right away, but eventually.

n1dvj
12-25-2006, 07:54 PM
Quote[/b] (kb9sri @ Dec. 24 2006,04:55)]this is still dumb no matter what anyone thinks...if you dont like my comment you can kiss my cb radio backside...welcome to hf you you lazy welfare sucking people...
As he said, I guess he IS a CBer!

Only I think most of the CBer's that are new that move into HAM radio will embrace it. I guess some, like this., just never let go of their CB roots and try to maintain 'ownership' by bullying. Only the phrase that used to be "This is MY channel" is now replaced by "This is MY frequecy" or "This is MY band"

Put your CB backside away. Grow up and become a real HAM or go back to 11M and your petty turf wars and leave the HAMs alone!

W6YNS
12-25-2006, 10:53 PM
All they are doing is eliminating the CW requirement to upgrade to HF Frequencies. There will still be people who use CW; just like people who still use Dial Up Internet or listening to Phonograph Records. The most important thing to do is learn about Electronics and develop good communication skills with people from different parts of the world. CW is a rather outdated mode of communication. But if a person enjoys operating CW let them do it.

kd6oji
12-25-2006, 11:01 PM
I appreciate the kind welcomes of the majority of the posts here, as do the others who intend to upgrade, yet have not become proficient in morse.
I obtained my no code tech in 1989 to get away from the CB mentality. I have enjoyed a decade plus on VHF and UHF, and have made a lot of great friends along the way. I have had one gentleman, somewhat of an elmer to me, call and extend his welcome as well, and he's currently an extra.

That is the kind of attitude the majority of the current General and Extra class operators do have, which will make the transition easier for us new generals coming in soon. Yes, we will make some mistakes, we are only human, but I know for one, the vast majority do NOT use CB jargon now, so there is no reason to believe that would happen when we upgrade.

As to those#who will still wish to spew their mindless drivel, foul language, etc. on air, beware.. there will be many more ears to lodge formal complaints on your poor operating practices and rules violations. but dont worry, if you wish to operate like you were on a CB, I won't disturb you, I got away from CB long ago.

n9lya
12-25-2006, 11:31 PM
Code or no code... Ham Radio will survive with or without the Cry Babies..

KI4KFW
12-26-2006, 12:12 AM
Quote[/b] (n8ag @ Dec. 23 2006,20:27)]Sorry to see the CW requirement go. Those who never use CW will miss a lot of contacts they could have made. Let's be real about this, 5 WPM is not difficult, period. This just falls in line will the on-going reduction of the theory portion of amateur exams. It all sadly boils down to economics. The more people who get their license begets more ham equipment sold which, in turn, begets more QST & CQ ads and subscriptions and more members for the ARRL.
I do not know why a person who did not pass a code test would not use code..Does one have too pass a test in order to use something? Is there no other way of learning CW other than passing a test? I may not understand what you have written here and I am sorry if this comes over without respect but the meaning of the first part of your paragraph has me scratching my head.

KB3MPZ
12-26-2006, 02:07 AM
am sitting here trying to figure out what to say to all the comments about "welfare generals". I see the aditudes of fellow hams and ask do I really want to upgrade or just sell off my equipment. Its not just the ones on here, the locals find out you are a nocode tech and you are no longer welcome anywhere. After a saturday "ham" breakfast my wife started dragging her feet studying for the tech test. I am just glad I am not in my home area all the time. I am a truck driver and get to alot of areas where us no code low lifes are welcome. If thing remain the way they are at this point I will mostlikely not be renewing my license. Or I will upgrade to extra and stick around just to hear all the OF's bitch like someone took something from them.
Get with it people lets deal with real problems BPL,jammers,and other illegal operators.

N4TLL
12-26-2006, 05:25 AM
Nice Letter and I can't wait to talk on HF because I'm a no Code Tech license Ham radio operator N4TLL Tim Lewis

kc8vpx
12-26-2006, 01:46 PM
Quote[/b] (N4TLL @ Dec. 26 2006,00:25)]Nice Letter and I can't wait to talk on HF because I'm a no Code Tech license Ham radio operator N4TLL Tim Lewis
Hey tim, I'm in the same ball park. I'll see you on HF!

K4JF
12-26-2006, 06:47 PM
Quote[/b] (WA4III @ Dec. 23 2006,17:03)]I know you grippers are a minority because of the number of letters to the FCC in opposition to the elimination of the code requirement.
Actually, a majority of respondents advocated retention of the code test, at least for Extra. So how would a "gripper" (whatever that is) be a minority if he/she was in agreement with the majority?

N5PVL
12-26-2006, 11:58 PM
A gripper is what you get when having a chance to learn something is looked upon as an unpleasant, unfair chore that should be avoided at any cost.

K7LRB
12-27-2006, 09:20 AM
Quote, "CW is a rather outdated mode of communication."

RIGHT.... not like SSB which has only been around for over 50 years!

73,
de Larry

K4JF
12-27-2006, 02:34 PM
Quote[/b] (N5PVL @ Dec. 25 2006,17:58)]A gripper is what you get when having a chance to learn something is looked upon as an unpleasant, unfair chore that should be avoided at any cost.
OK. So it's not related to "Gipper", our much-missed former president.

I figured it had something to do with how you "grip" your microphone.

kb7hk
12-28-2006, 05:52 PM
Before getting too excited make sure you read the ruling.
Technicians, #the new rule states that Techs will now have the same HF priviledges as current Tech/plus and Novices have. That means you'll only have voice/ssb priviledges on 10meters, 28.3-28.5mhz. Data and CW is allowed from 28.0-28.3mhz while CW is also allowed in the 28.3-28.5mhz band for novice/tech's.
On the other bands with Novice/Tech HF priviledges only CW is allowed.
You will need to get your General to go any further. #
Hope to see you all upgrade soon. Good luck!
gud dx de
KB7HK

KB1SF
12-29-2006, 01:29 AM
Quote[/b] (KC0OFZ @ Dec. 23 2006,15:43)]Lets see about 2 years from now when at least one or more written tests is gone and he (K1ZZ and the League) wants to ELIMINATE CW bulletins and practice just to continue his pandering. #The League is a sell out and will not stop now.
A "sellout" to whom?

Almost half of US Hams don't currently possess a coded license. #And a goodly number of the rest could absolutely care less about Morse.

Please give me one good reason why the League should continue indefinitely to expend scarce resources catering to an ever-shrinking minority of Luddite Hams who are still bound and determined to keep Ham Radio stuck firmly in the technological "dark ages". #

Fortunately, most US Hams don't live in the past. #The League shouldn't either. #

Keith
KB1SF / VA3KSF

K4JF
12-30-2006, 02:21 AM
Quote[/b] (K7LRB @ Dec. 26 2006,03:20)]Quote, "CW is a rather outdated mode of communication."

RIGHT.... not like SSB which has only been around for over 50 years!
Or like FM, which has been around even longer.

KB5YAI
12-30-2006, 03:01 AM
I am a no code tech and plan to still practice my morse code and when I get good at it I will use CW as often as I can it's sad to see the older hams act like a bunch of cry babies, I am now studying for my general class license, so everyone have a happy new year, see ya in 2007.

73 de kb5yai, soon to be a welfare general. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif

N3KTI
12-30-2006, 04:40 AM
i am a no code tec do i have to take the gen exam to work hf? email me at olerjc@hotmail.comty N3KTI

K4JF
12-30-2006, 06:34 PM
Quote[/b] (N3KTI @ Dec. 28 2006,22:40)]i am a no code tec do i have to take the gen exam to work hf? email me at olerjc@hotmail.comty N3KTI
You will be able to work SSB and data on part of 10 meters and CW on parts of 80, 40 and 15 meters when this goes into effect sometime in February (est). For more than that, you will have to take the General written exam.

(From your friendly neighborhood VE)

kc8shp
12-30-2006, 08:12 PM
To those of you that support this new no-code ruling, I applaud you and thank you.

I only hold a technician license.

To those of you that call those like me "lazy welfare sucking people" or "welfare Generals", I also applaud you. I applaud you for showing your true CBish colors. Now, when I'm on HF, I know what calls NOT to respond to.

I, for one, attempted for 2 years to learn code so that I can take full advantage of the HF bands without success. I used CD's, tapes, various computer programs, and help from other hams. I was never able to learn code proficiently enough to pass my test. So, I welcome this news with much excitement. I'm ready to toss some HF rigs in my rig and meet new hams while driving the countries hiways.

Chip
KC8SHP

KB1SF
12-30-2006, 10:32 PM
Folks, in the final analysis, I think it will be shown that all the FCC has really done by dropping Morse testing is to re-arrange the deck chairs on the Titanic…a little.

That is, has anyone taken a few minutes away from their keyboards to actually listen across our HF Bands lately? #Am I the only one noticing that, on many days, they seem dead from end to end? #Aside from the occasional contest weekend (or 75 Meter net) most of what I hear these days on the bulk of our HF bands is little more than dead air. Now, I know we are approaching the bottom of the sunspot cycle. But, even so, I remember our bands being a LOT busier during previous sunspot minimums. #

All of which begs the question: #Where the heck is everybody?

Over and over again on this and other forums I hear the broken-record lament that our bands are now going to be “invaded” from those dreaded “no-coders” and that those of us who prefer the “legacy modes” are going to be QRMed to death by those “digital elitists” once the ARRL (or someone else’s) regulating by bandwidth petition becomes “law”. #The other broken-record I hear is that our bands are now being “given away” to unqualified newcomers who haven’t worked “hard enough” for their privileges. #

But, while we are all arguing about whose slice of HF spectrum needs to be protected from which dreaded onslaught, has anyone noticed that fewer and fewer of us actually seem to be OPERATING these days? #That is, how many of us have recently sent a CQ for several minutes at a time with not a single reply?

Sadly, the same lack of activity seems to hold true on our VHF and UHF bands. #How many of us have listened to one or more of our local repeaters only to hear little more than the repeater ID for hours at a time? How many of us have made a call on our local repeater (other than during “drive time”) only to have nobody return the call? The same holds true for Ham Radio clubs. #They, too, appear to be dying a slow death.

Just before I stepped down as President of AMSAT-NA, I remember some of our experimenters had proposed placing a wideband (HF to UHF and above) receiver on one of our satellites then under construction. #The receiver would be able to listen on any frequency (or series of frequencies) on these bands from Low Earth orbit and would even digitally store what it heard for later download.

Unfortunately, this was all happening at about the same time the ARRL was locked in battle with the “Little LEOs” who had formally requested parts of our 2m and 70 Cm spectrum be re-allocated to the commercial satellite service for their world-wide use. #

Needless to say, once the ARRL got wind of what AMSAT was proposing, they had a proverbial “Cow”. #Why? #Simply because the downloads from our wideband receiver would show the world, beyond a shadow of doubt, that our Ham bands are NOT being used in an “efficient” manner and that the Little LEO proponents could now use that information against us to argue their case for world-wide sharing (if not re-allocation) of our spectrum! #Sadly, based purely on current spectral use, it became painfully clear that our Amateur Radio interests simply wouldn’t have a leg to stand on in such an argument.

Now, while it appears the “Little LEO” threat has gone away (at least for the moment), I think the long-term implications of this issue should be a wake-up call to us all.

That is, I believe the principle threat to Amateur Radio’s existence these days has nothing whatsoever to do with “code” vs. “no-code”. #It is our inability to attract and keep newcomers combined with our own lack of interest in operating. #That is, many of us still have licenses, but fewer and fewer of us are regularly operating on the air. #

And, in the eyes of some VERY well heeled commercial interests (who, by the way, are also listening to us…or rather…our dead air!) that make our bands “ripe for the picking” because they are mostly empty these days. #In their eyes, we are now sitting on GOBS of commercially valuable spectrum space that’s being “wasted” on an ever-dwindling bunch of crusty old curmudgeons who remain hell-bent on using their quaint, tube-type radios whose VFOs have long since rusted in place.

While it’s certainly fun to reminisce about “what was”, the sad truth is that we live in the present, not the past. #And, unfortunately, it would appear that the FCC…by pursuing their decades long incentive licensing foolishness, all the while trying (in vain) to keep the “riff raff” out of the hobby...have now also insured that only the “elite of the elite” got (or get) in. #

Unfortunately, by doing so, the FCC long ago turned what was SUPPOSED to be an international “amateur” radio service designed specifically for persons “solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest” into a “National RF Engineer Training Service” for their own, self-serving purposes. #That purpose was (and is) to feed the (once dominant) US electronics industry. But, in the process, the FCC also made sure that ordinary, non-electronically inclined people of average intelligence and experience need not apply. #

Would someone please tell me how a so-called “personal” radio service should also, by implication, be expected to perform “public service”, “emergency communications” or forming a “pool of trained operators, technicians and electronics experts” or even “enhancing international good will?”

Cleary, these are all functions of GOVERNMENTS, not of individuals interested in radio technique “with a personal aim”. #What’s more, there are internationally allocated GOVERNMENT radio frequencies set aside specifically for such purposes…. and the Amateur Service is absolutely NOT one of them!

Now, certainly, the FCC will officially tell you that Hams donate their time and the use of their equipment to such worthy causes as “volunteers”. #However, if this is true, then why go to all the time and expense to codify all those OTHER wonderful reasons for our existence into governing regulation? #Furthermore, why go to all the trouble to set up a licensing structure that looks more like a college degree program for graduate electrical engineers rather than simply a radio service designed for one’s own personal use, enlightenment and enjoyment?

The bottom line here is that the stated objectives set out for our Service in Part 97 now go WELL beyond the international basis, purpose and scope for our Service. #They are there primarily to help insure that we in Amateur Service in the United States do the Government’s bidding, rather than the other way around. #What’s more, these clearly self-serving objectives absolutely DON’T belong in the US version of why the Amateur Radio Service exists because they specifically contravene what the international regulations say on the subject.

And, any way you cut it, my friends, the Amateur Radio Service in the United States has now paid dearly for such regulatory highway robbery. #And the results are plain to see.

Our average age is now approaching 60 years old. #The last time the number of Amateur Service licensees actually increased was back in 2003. #That was nearly four years ago. #And, because we’re on a 10 year license cycle here in the USA, who knows how many more licensed US Hams are still being carried on the books that are now quite dead? #And, how many others have since become so completely disgusted with all the bickering and “mine is bigger than yours” elitist snobbery the FCC has enabled (by their incentive licensing foolishness) that such folks have now moved on to other pursuits never to return?

But, clearly, unless we all (yours truly included) begin spending a LOT more time on the air (and less time here chatting on the Internet about how our bands should (or shouldn’t) be carved up among ourselves) I’m afraid much of our spectrum is going to eventually be re-allocated to some other service based on our own “benign neglect”.

And, sadly, when that happens, we’ll have nobody to blame but ourselves. That’s because we will have “exclusive clubbed” and “over regulated” ourselves right out of existence.

73,

Keith
KB1SF / VA3KSF

K2RRT
12-31-2006, 09:16 PM
This is perfect. It is nothing but the truth. We are going to debate our carpets right out from under us...

N4TLL
01-04-2007, 01:53 AM
I still say that's a Nice Letter and I'm a No Code Tech and I'm waiting to see what bands Should I talk on HF Tim Lewis N4TLL

kd5fep
01-04-2007, 02:03 PM
Quote[/b] (kb9sri @ Dec. 24 2006,14:22)]bpl is not the problem doing away with mores code is just dumbing down america if that is your worry bpl? smart hams will fix that
...........
Now dat's funny rat dar, don't care who ya are.