PDA

View Full Version : A persuasive writing


KE5FRF
12-20-2006, 04:01 PM
OK, I submitted this to the News category, but I want to share my work in the regular forums for folks who may not ever read those postings.

I've also submitted it to a few other forums and QST magazine in hopes that it will manage touch the ham community here and abroad.

Feel free to distribute it (if you enjoy it and find it worthwhile)

73 and God Bless.

************************************************


TITLE: "SO NOW YOU'RE HF-ACTIVE"

© Heath Roberts, KE5FRF
With permission granted by the author to distribute with appropriate intellectual credit.



"Wow, I never thought this day would come. The FCC finally flexed its regulatory muscle and notified the world that US Amateur Radio operators will no longer be required to pass a Morse code proficiency test to indulge in the world below 50 Mhz. What does this mean for ME?"

This is a fair an honest question that many Technician class amateurs will be faced with in the coming weeks and months as American hams learn to accept the end of a long standing tradition and the beginning of a new era. It is natural to be excited about the new privileges that you will be granted. You are eager to plan your new HF station, purchase some new gear, and maybe even erect a tower and directional antenna for that DX band you've been hearing such great things about. There is so much out there to do and be a part of, you don't know where to begin.

I can assure you, this is a road that everyone has traveled in their quest as an amateur operator, code or not. You'll be certain to receive the wise counsel of some older fellow who has more than a few tips to share. A friend who upgraded his license to General last year will offer his insight into propagation and techniques for busting a pile-up. The local club will be offering a class on operating procedures. No worries, for there is a lot of resources at your disposal. All you must do is display a willingness to learn.

As exciting as the news is for you and as eager as you are, you can't help but wonder what mode you will like the best. Everyone says that PSK-31 offers the most efficient use of the spectrum and can cut through a host of propagation conditions that other modes can't. You saw an Extra class ham on Field Day working a digital station and this was the mode he used. It was interesting and he sure looked like he was having fun, but it kind of reminded you of an internet chat room like QRZ.COM.

Your buddy, the guy who upgraded his license before the new rules, swears that SSB is the most fun mode. He barely squeaked by on his code test and never looked back. He regularly checks into the WAS nets and is close to his goal on 80 meters and already confirmed 40 meters. There certainly won't be a lack of new friends to make on phone. Hmm...Maybe this will become your favorite mode too.

But there's one other fellow who keeps showing up and offering you suggestions that make a lot of sense but you're just not sure if you have it in you. He's the local CW guru and he spent the last two years coaxing you to master the code before the requirement was dropped, but you failed to heed his advice. You know it is probably too late to learn it now, the new rules go into effect next week, but you must admit that with the "pressure" off the idea of casually studying the code is intriguing. You've read some stuff on the internet about colorful figures in the history of amateur radio and telegraphy like Hiram Percy Maxim and T.R. McElroy. You've watched your CW friend use his Blue Racer during a contest and were fascinated by his skills. You feel a certain connection to this storied tradition even when you tap out "SOS" on your desk with your index finger. What is stopping you from turning your years of procrastination into something you think might benefit you in the long run?

My friend the answer is simple. Nothing is stopping you, nothing at all except the same thing that hindered every CW op who ever "dit his first dah." Learning Morse code is a work in progress. It is an endeavor of achievement that has a certain beginning but no real end. No matter what skill level your CW associates may brag to possess, they all make mistakes and have plenty of room for improvement. Just knowing this should set your mind at ease and give you inspiration!

Yep, you finally got that new HF rig via UPS delivery. The tower isn't up yet, but you managed to hoist a coax fed dipole into the old oak tree in the back yard. You cut it for 40 meters in hopes that it will offer the most playing time at this point in the sunspot cycle. Everything is hooked up and ready to go.

Power "ON"....Shschshhhschhtishahshhi....Static. "Hmmm what frequency is that? Oh, out of band."....Zzschshizzz...dadidadit dadadidah...dadidadit dadadidah. Oh boy, you recognize that familiar sound. Someone is calling CQ in code. Well, at least you know your antenna and feed line are working ok. Tune up...tune down...tune up. Nothing but static crashes and faint voices. You can't make anything out. Everything seems to be in order, filters configured for SSB. This is 40 meters, and you are on the lower sideband. "Oh well, I guess the band is dead".

So you tune back down to the CW sub band. Amazingly, as you move back to that CQ frequency, you must hear at least three ongoing QSOs along the way. Two of them are way to fast to make heads or tails, but one guy is sending slow enough that even YOU can copy a few of his characters. "Wow", you think. "I could do THAT!" You put the headphones on and lean back in your chair, close your eyes, and listen to the rhythm. You only know a handful of letters...S,O,C,Q....uh..uh...well SOS and CQ...but you are amazed that every time you hear these characters you immediately recognize them. "Hey, 26 letters in the alphabet, and I already know four!" You think to yourself, "Not bad."

My friend, you've just been bitten by the bug. There is a mystery behind all of those funny tones in the ether, and we've all found a childlike fascination with them at some point. You stand on the threshold of letting it be more than a fleeting interest. You have an opportunity before you to affiliate yourself with a tradition that has stood the test of time, and will stand strong many, many more years despite the actions of the Commission. Will you be just another op who jumps on board the sideband rollercoaster of QRM and static, or will you take the time to learn and develop a skill that will stay with you a lifetime?

This message is brought to you in hopes that you will consider the opportunities that CW brings. There is a large group of hams young and old whose only desire is to see the art and skill of telegraphy passed on for as long as it is feasible. Back before the FCC R&O, many of these folks seemed abrasive, but you must realize that they knew this day was coming but wanted nothing more than to delay it for as long as they could. Their desire is not to hold back deserving and ambitious hams that have much to offer. It never was. They simply seek to maintain the traditions which are the history of this hobby. They want to preserve and foster a mode of communication that they love and are proud to be a part of. Were their concerns and their motivations so unworthy?

Next time you fire up that brand new rig and hear the tell-tale music of Samuel Morse's creation, think about these things, and consider getting in touch with that fellow with the Vibroplex. I'm sure he'll be glad to invite you to his shack to show off his bug collection, and no doubt he'd be the first to take the time out to teach you those other 22 letters and some numbers to boot. Just think about it.

N2RJ
12-20-2006, 04:20 PM
Very nice article, Heath.

But be prepared for people to yell at you for forcing morse down their throats.

K0RGR
12-20-2006, 04:22 PM
Well, I think your article is well intentioned, but I'm afraid that the NCT community will see it as yet another attempt to proseletyze them into our old religion.

We do need to encourage the newbies to try CW, any way we can.

There are a couple things that will soon be possible:

1. Machine sent and received code. OK- code reader software is poor at best, but under good conditions, at least short QSOs should be workable, with some patience on both ends. The object is to send and receive intelligence. I expect first attempts to be comical, at best.

2. Cross-mode QSOs - newbies use keyboards to send CW to higher class licensees operating in the phone band.

Hopefully, we can get a fair percentage of the newcomers interested in CW before they run off and take the General test and disappear into SSB hell forever. Then, we can push the ARRL Code Proficiency Awards - have you got your '40'?

KE5FRF
12-20-2006, 04:31 PM
I doubt I'll EVER get my "40". http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif I am a hunt and peck typist and I have trouble with training my hands to react to things I hear. I've heard that this is the only way to copy high speeds when you can't write that fast.

I'm shooting for 30 WPM proficiency certifcation, I'm almost there.

Anyway, if it "is" percieved as an attempt to shove it down their throats, it was not my intention by a long shot. The fight is over and it will soon be in the books. No use in perpetuating a fight anymore.

I feel like now the philosophy has to change. The OT's and others like myself on the bands who have passed a code test are going to have to adapt, and we will. The vast majority of us have already accepted this change and have modified our perspective, however reluctantly.

On the same token, I am hoping that Techs will see that the fight is over, and entertain the idea that Morse code is a mode worth learning if for no other sake but to preserve a legacy and add another tool to their arsenal.

Again, I have no desire to be abrasive or condescending.

n0iu
12-20-2006, 07:19 PM
I don't want to discourage you, but QST most likely will not take it, not for an Op-Ed piece anyway. While you have obviously put a considerable amount of thought into your piece, they have a limit of about 900 words and yours checks in at 1330 words.

Also, QST insists upon exclusivity. If you have submitted it somewhere else, they won't print it. I have submitted a few things over the years to QST and if they chose not to accept it, then they will encourage you to find other outlets for your work. If you want something to appear in QST, send it to them first and wait for their response. Even though it may not be published right away, they will tell you pretty quickly whether or not it will appear in a future issue. If they do accept it, they own it whether they pay you for it or not.

Scott NĜIU

N2RJ
12-20-2006, 07:26 PM
Try CQ magazine. They are somewhat open with submissions.

KE5FRF
12-20-2006, 07:47 PM
Well, no matter. I have recieved several e-mails telling me that it has been forwarded through some reflectors and requests for permission to post on blogs. My only desire was to (hopefully) spread a positive message to as many as who might care to read it. The internet is as effective tool as any for that means. I really enjoy this hobby and the newness and excitement has not worn off for me yet.

(Still, I'm proud of my work as I haven't sat down to compose such a paper since my stint in college. I would have liked to have seen it in print in a magazine.)

ac3p
12-21-2006, 07:36 PM
I would like to put it in an issue of our local club rag of which I am editor, if that's ok. I would be happy to send you a copy so you can see it in print.

73 es GL fer the holidays, OM.

Frank AC3P

AC0H
12-21-2006, 08:17 PM
Nicely done.
See if Walt can get it in the next SPAR "Round Table".
I can't remember is SKCC has an online news letter or not.

KE5FRF
12-21-2006, 09:16 PM
Quote[/b] (ac3p @ Dec. 21 2006,14:36)]I would like to put it in an issue of our local club rag of which I am editor, if that's ok. #I would be happy to send you a copy so you can see it in print.

73 es GL fer the holidays, OM.

Frank AC3P
Frank,

That is why I wrote it, at the behest of a SPAR member who suggested I write something. It is my hope that anyone who thinks it is a worthwhile read will share it within the ham community.

And yes, if you put it in print, I would enjoy getting a copy, email if you prefer but a hardcopy would be fine too.

TY for asking.



Oh, and Kevin, AC0H...I posted this on the SPAR forum in the thread where I was encouraged to write it. I guess I should PM Walt and let him know about it.

w5alt
12-21-2006, 09:25 PM
Quote[/b] (KE5FRF @ Dec. 21 2006,17:16)]... I guess I should PM Walt and let him know about it.
Heath, I've been reading. The next Roundtable will be for March 2007, though. I'm not sure you want to wait that long.

Merry Christmas!

73,
Walt, W5ALT

ke4pjw
12-21-2006, 09:51 PM
Great article Heath!

This is what folks need to hear.

Best Regards and Merry Christmas!

n1ydx
12-22-2006, 02:33 AM
Not only enjoyed that article but rang bells on how I got into Ham Radio.

Thanks

N1YDX - Lee

VA3GRV
12-23-2006, 04:29 PM
Very Gud Heath!!! FB!!http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

WA2ZDY
12-23-2006, 05:12 PM
Did you do as I suggested and look at k9ya.org?