PDA

View Full Version : The ARRL Letter, Vol 25, No 46


AA7BQ
11-18-2006, 04:47 PM
***************
The ARRL Letter
Vol. 25, No. 46
November 17, 2006
***************

================================================== =========
NOTE: The new Amateur Radio rules detailed in the recent "omnibus" FCC
Report and Order (R&O), WT Docket 04-140, will go into effect at 12:01 AM
EST December 15. See "Amateur Radio 'omnibus' rule changes," below.
================================================== =========


IN THIS EDITION:


* +Amateur Radio "omnibus" rules changes to go into effect Dec 15
* +Hensley is New Vice Director in Roanoke Division
* +Broadcasters intervene to support ARRL in BPL court appeal*
* +ARRL 500 kHz experiment kicking into high gear
* +W1AW sporting brand-new antennas
* +SKYWARN Recognition Day coming December 2
* +Delegates elect new ITU Secretary-General
* +Hams headed for space
* Solar Update
* IN BRIEF:
This weekend on the radio: The ARRL November Sweepstakes (SSB)
ARRL Certification and Continuing Education course registration
Celebrate a birthday on the air!
Great thing to do for our troops




+Available on ARRL Audio News <http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/audio/>

================================================== =========
==>Delivery problems: First see FAQ
<http://www.arrl.org/members-only/faq.html#nodelivery>, then e-mail
<letter-dlvy@arrl.org>
==>Editorial questions or comments only: Rick Lindquist, N1RL,
<n1rl@arrl.org>
================================================== =========
NOTE: ARRL Headquarters will be closed Thursday and Friday, November 23 and
24, for the Thanksgiving holiday. There will be no editions of The ARRL
Letter and ARRL Audio News or W1AW bulletin and code practice transmissions
on Friday, November 24. ARRL Headquarters will re-open Monday, November 27,
at 8 AM EST. The ARRL Letter and ARRL Audio News will return Friday,
December 1. We wish everyone a safe and enjoyable holiday!
================================================== =========

==> AMATEUR RADIO "OMNIBUS" RULES CHANGES TO GO INTO EFFECT DECEMBER 15

A little over a month after the Federal Communications Commission released
the Report and Order (R&O) in the so-called "Omnibus" Amateur Radio
proceeding, WT Docket 04-140 (FCC 06-149) to the public, a revised version
appeared November 15 in the Federal Register
<http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01jan20061800/edocket.access.gpo.go
v/2006/pdf/E6-19189.pdf>. The changes in the R&O will take effect Friday,
December 15, at 12:01 AM EST, 30 days after its publication.

As expected, the Report & Order clarified two items that had raised some
concerns when it was first released last month: That the 80/75 meter band
split applies to all three IARU Regions, and that FCC licensees in Region 2,
which includes North America, can continue to use RTTY/data emissions in the
7.075-7.100 MHz band.

Still to be resolved are three controversial aspects of the Proceeding:

* Expansion of the 75 meter phone band all the way down to 3600 kHz (thus
reducing the privileges of General, Advanced and Amateur Extra class
licensees, who had RTTY/data privileges in the 80 meter band, and CW
privileges of General and Advanced class licensees)

* The elimination of J2D emissions, data sent by modulating an SSB
transmitter, of more than 500 Hz bandwidth. This will make PACTOR III at
full capability illegal. Other digital modes effectively rendered illegal
below 30 MHz include Olivia and MT63 (when operated at bandwidths greater
than 500 Hz), 1200-baud packet, Q15X25 and Clover 2000.

* The elimination of access to the automatic control RTTY/data subband at
3620-3635 kHz.

The ARRL Board is discussing the possibility of a petition to reconsider
several items in the R&O.

ARRL Regulatory Information Specialist Dan Henderson, N1ND, commented: "The
release of the R&O in the Federal Register has started the countdown clock.
We are all looking forward to being able to use the refarmed frequencies
starting on December 15. We are still anxiously awaiting the release of the
Report and Order for 05-235, the Morse Code Proceeding. We are hopeful that
the Commission will be able to move on that petition and address the
outstanding issues in the Omnibus R&O soon."

For more information, see the band chart
<http://www2.arrl.org/announce/regulatory/wt04-140/Hambands3_color.pdf> and
the Frequently Asked Questions on WT Docket No. 04-140
<http://www2.arrl.org/announce/regulatory/wt04-140/faq.html>. Both have been
updated to reflect the R&O as it was published in the Federal Register.

==> HENSLEY IS NEW VICE DIRECTOR IN ROAOKE DIVISION

Patricia Hensley, N4ROS, was elected as Vice Director of the Roanoke
Division today. She defeated incumbent Rev Les Shattuck, K4NK, 2280 to 996.
A total of 3281 ballots were received; five ballots were not able to be
counted, being declared spoiled or invalid. The three year term begins at
noon EST January 1, 2007.

Hensley, a retired school principal from Richburg, South Carolina, has
served in ARRL volunteer positions for the past 15 years, serving as South
Carolina Section Manager from February 2000 to December 2002. She is a
recipient of the ARRL Instructor of the Year award and is currently the
South Carolina state director for Air Force MARS.

Hensley ran on a platform wanting to make the term "Amateur Radio operator"
a highly respected title. She said she feels, "…an Amateur Radio license no
longer fosters respect from community and national leaders. Even FEMA finds
it 'more comfortable' to hire part-time individuals to provide emergency
communications because amateurs are 'volunteers.'"
She went on to acknowledge that ARRL membership is declining, and leadership
positions are "…filled by default because few want to serve. More is
required than smiling faces behind a hamfest table to solve these problems."
She said she sees restrictive covenants and interference to frequencies as
major issues affecting the Amateur Radio community.

Stepping forward to run for election for what she calls "proactive change,"
she said the members of the Amateur Radio community "must be regarded as
individuals who are knowledgeable about our avocation and are willing and
competent to serve our communities in time of need."

Rev Shattuck became Vice Director in 2000 after serving as South Carolina
Section Manager. He has been licensed for over 40 years. In the past, Rev
Shattuck has served as president of QRP ARCI, and is a member of QCWA, the
A-1 Operator Club, DXCC, VUCC, FISTS CW Club and ARES/RACES. He is currently
serving as pastor of Gilgal United Methodist Church. He lives in Anderson,
South Carolina.

==> BROADCASTERS INTERVENE TO SUPPORT ARRL IN BPL COURT APPEAL

The Association for Maximum Service Television (MSTV) and the National
Association of Broadcasters (NAB) have filed a joint motion for leave to
intervene in support of the ARRL in its court appeal of the Federal
Communications Commission's Broadband over Power Line (BPL) rules.

The motion to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
is dated November 9 and states: "MSTV and NAB believe that the regulations
under review are arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to law, and will
adversely impact their members by, among other things, permitting unlicensed
users of radio spectrum to interfere with licensed uses of the spectrum."

MSTV and NAB are entitled to intervene as a matter of right, so the Court is
expected to grant the motion. As expected, some BPL proponents are seeking
to intervene on the side of the FCC.

ARRL Chief Executive Officer David Sumner, K1ZZ, welcomed the support of
MSTV and NAB. "It is gratifying that these two prestigious broadcasting
organizations recognize the danger posed to all FCC licensees by the FCC's
flawed BPL rules. It's good to have them on our side."

==>ARRL 500 kHz EXPERIMENT KICKING INTO HIGH GEAR

The group of Amateur Radio operators researching the radio spectrum in the
vicinity of 500 kHz already have recorded a few successes. The 500 KC
Experimental Group for Amateur Radio <http://www.500kc.com/> is operating
under Part 5 experimental license WD2XSH, which the FCC Office of
Engineering and Technology granted September 13 to the ARRL. Project manager
Fritz Raab, W1FR, says WD2XSH participants have been heard across both the
Atlantic and the Pacific as well as all around the US.

"Things took off much faster than I had ever imagined," Raab told ARRL early
this month. "Eleven station are on the air now." Others in the 21-station
group included on the Experimental license continue efforts to cobble
together the transmitting and antenna systems necessary to put out a signal
on what group members call "the 600 meter band."

Raab says the 600-meter signal of well-known low-frequency enthusiast "Dex"
McIntyre, W4DEX, in North Carolina -- operating as WD2XSH/10 -- was copied
October 10 in Germany using very slow-speed CW (QRSS). Other stations have
since duplicated that feat. Rudy Severns, N6LF, operating as WD2XSH/20 from
Oregon, not only is heard regularly throughout the western half of the US
but has been copied in Hawaii and, possibly, in New Zealand, Raab says,
noting that the New Zealand reception was "not sufficiently clear" to make a
claim.

While not a part of the experimental group, Ralph Wallio, W0RPK, has assumed
the role of official record keeper and has noted more than two dozen one-way
reception reports of more than 1000 miles. The list included "by ear" CW
reception from Colorado to Massachusetts, nearly 1800 miles. The best
distance as of earlier this week: 4515 miles from Conard Murray, WS4S,
operating as WD2XSH/11 in Tennessee to Germany using QRSS (reception using
computer software).

Operating as WD2XSH/14 from Vermont, Raab says he's managed three QSOs with
his "meager 42-foot vertical" -- New Hampshire, Massachusetts and North
Carolina -- plus reception in Ohio. He envisions at least a secondary
600-meter Amateur Radio allocation from 495 to 510 kHz that would support
Amateur Radio emergency communication via groundwave.

The two-year WD2XSH authorization permits experimentation and research
between 505 and 510 kHz using narrowband modes at power levels of up to 20 W
effective radiated power (ERP). The Midwest stations are limited to 505 to
508 kHz for the time being, Raab notes. The first QSO took place September
21 between the stations in Tennessee and North Carolina — a distance of some
300 miles.

To get on the air, WD2XSH participants have repurposed some older gear and
even some text equipment. Paul Signorelli, W0RW, operating as WD2XSH/21 from
Colorado, has modified a vintage Heath DX-100 transmitter for LF CW
operation. "I match the DX-100 output to a 5-turn link of #10 wire," he
reported in a detailed description of how he was able to get the old rig to
transmit just below the AM broadcast band. Getting "down there" points up
the need to increase physical component size by several orders of magnitude.

"The link is on a 13-inch diameter cardboard hoop," Signorelli continues.
"It slips up and down over the antenna loading coil and is adjusted for
lowest SWR." That antenna loading coil itself is a foot in diameter, wound
with #10 solid, insulated wire. A 30-gallon trash can provides the
weatherproofing for the coil. The DX-100 generates 100 W of RF on 500 kHz.
Signorelli advises against using conventional-sized coax. "This transmitter
will smoke your coax if you have high SWR," he said. He's using hardline
instead.

While Raab notes that while the current license cannot accommodate more
participants, he plans to re-evaluate the situation in a year. "At that
time, we may request a revision to the license that makes substitutions for
stations that have not gotten on the air and possibly add some new
stations," he says on the group's Web site. "Substitutes and additions will
be selected based upon their potential to contribute to the experiment." He
cautions, "This is an experimental license, not just ham radio on a new
frequency!"

The experimental group does invite reception reports
<http://w5jgv.com/500kcreportform.htm> of transmissions made by group
members. You do not have to be a member of the experimental team to send a
reception report.

==>W1AW COMPLETES "THE BIG (ANTENNA) PROJECT"

Can you hear us now? W1AW's typically strong signals may be pushing S meters
a tad higher now, following the recent replacement of nearly every one of
the station's antennas. The last major upgrade was in 1989. Despite wear and
tear inflicted during numerous New England winters, the old antennas --
installed on four towers at the W1AW site adjacent to ARRL Headquarters --
had been getting the job done reliably. Even so, replacing the aging
aluminum had been on the agenda for a while. W1AW Station Manager Joe
Carcia, NJ1Q, says the loss of one-half of a director on a 20-meter
rotatable Yagi at the very top of the 120-foot tower pushed the project to
top priority.

"Instead of just piecemealing it, we decided to do the major antenna
replacement now," he explained. "Antenna for antenna, they're essentially
the same capability or better." Interest from the W1AW Endowment Fund
<http://www.arrl.org/endoww1aw.html>, which depends on members'
contributions, covered the nearly $24,000 project cost. All of the new
antennas are manufactured by M2.

The W1AW antenna farm includes both fixed-direction "bulletin" Yagis as well
as several rotatable Yagis that can serve to fill in "holes" in W1AW's
coverage pattern and are available for use by radio amateurs who visit W1AW
to operate.

While the new antenna farm may mean "a few dB" of additional signal during
bulletin and code practice transmissions, Carcia says, visiting ops will be
the primary beneficiaries. A five-element 20-meter Yagi replaced the old
three-element unit available for visitors.

"I've already noticed that when we put visitors on 20 meters, we've had very
good reports at barefoot power levels," he reports. Carcia says that while
the five-element Yagi's pattern is a bit more narrow, it has a much better
front-to-back ratio. The new antennas also will enhance ARRL's ability to
put the station on the air for contests, special occasions and during
emergencies.

W1AW undertook the massive antenna swap in consultation with ARRL antenna
expert Dean Straw, N6BV, and installation contractor (and noted contester
and DXer) Matt Strelow, KC1XX.

Replaced were all 14 of W1AW's HF Yagis as well as Yagis for 2 meters and 70
cm. The 120-foot tower alone supports two Yagis for 40, three for 20, two
for 15 and one for 10 meters. The project included changing out a
lightning-damaged rotator on the big tower.

One especially significant antenna upgrade involved the 30-meter system.
W1AW went from a cut-down 40-meter Yagi to a "monster" full-size 30-meter
Yagi that dwarfed the ground crew tasked with handling it. The 15 and 12
meter Yagis went from three elements to four. Carcia also installed a new
160-meter dipole using Poly 13 UV-jacketed stranded copper-clad steel wire.

The antenna upgrades took about four days in all, spread out over a period
of a few weeks. While the weather cooperated by and large, Carcia says
inclement weather did get in the way at one point. Strelow, an assistant and
several members of the ARRL HQ staff performed the work, which included a
tower inspection. The old antennas -- some damaged and all requiring new
hardware -- were offered "as is" to ARRL staff members. Carcia says he's
pleased with the results.

"I'm very impressed by the performance overall, but especially on 17
meters," Carcia said of the new system. "We are putting 1 kW into three
elements. The amp is extremely happy with the antenna."

Project photos and details on the W1AW antenna farm accompany our Web site
news story <http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2006/11/01/100/>.

==> SKYWARN RECOGNITION DAY IS DECEMBER 2

The 8th annual SKYWARN Recognition Day (SRD) special event will take place
Saturday, December 2, 2006. SKYWARN Recognition Day is an event co-sponsored
by the National Weather Service and the American Radio Relay League, and it
is the National Weather Service's way of saying "thank you" to Amateur Radio
operators for their commitment to helping keep their communities safe.
During the 24-hour special event, amateur radio operators will visit their
local National Weather Service (NWS) office, set up Amateur Radio stations,
and work as a team to contact other hams across the world.

"Ham radio operators volunteering as storm spotters are an extremely
valuable asset to National Weather Service operations since they are
cross-trained in both communications and severe storm recognition", says
Scott Mentzer (N***QE), organizer of the event and Meteorologist-In-Charge
at the NWS office in Goodland, Kansas.

In typical warning operations, it is the direct communication between mobile
spotters and the local NWS office which provides vital ground truth
information. Spotter reports of hail size, wind damage and surface-based
rotation in real time greatly assists the radar warning operator since that
information can be correlated with Doppler radar displays. The result can
range anywhere from a more strongly-worded statement to convey a greater
sense of urgency, or the issuance of a tornado warning a few minutes earlier
than would otherwise have been possible.

While National Weather Service offices utilize the real-time reporting of
severe weather events to assist in warning operations, hurricanes and
tropical storms have shown us that ham radio operators are equally important
during the recovery phase of natural disasters.
There are countless stories where ham radio worked in tandem with more
conventional technology to relay emergency traffic.

SKYWARN Recognition Day will be held on December 2, 2006, from 0000 UTC to
2400 UTC.

The object is for all radio amateur stations to exchange QSO information
with as many National Weather Service Stations as possible on 80, 40, 20,
15, 10, 6, and 2 meter bands plus the 70 centimeter band. Contacts via
repeaters are permitted.

The exchange should include call sign, signal report, location, and a one or
two word description of the weather occurring at your site ("sunny", "partly
cloudy", "windy", etc.). NWS stations will work various modes including SSB,
FM, AM, RTTY, CW, and PSK31. While working digital modes, special event
stations will append "NWS" to their call sign (e.g., N***A/NWS).

==>DELEGATES ELECT AMATEUR RADIO-FRIENDLY ITU SECRETARY-GENERAL

Member states of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) attending
the 17th ITU Plenipotentiary Conference in Antalya, Turkey, have elected
Hamadoun I. Touré of Mali as Secretary-General of ITU for a four-year term.
Touré topped a field of six candidates to succeed Japan's Yoshio Utsumi, who
cannot run for another term. International Amateur Radio Union (IARU)
President Larry Price, W4RA, says the ITU member states chose wisely in
their selection of Touré.

"Hamadoun Touré is someone with whom IARU has worked for the past eight
years," Price said, "and he has a proven record of understanding the
importance of the Amateur Services, especially their importance in emergency
and disaster communications."

IARU Vice President Tim Ellam, VE6SH, who's attending the "Plenipot,"
congratulated Touré in person on behalf of IARU and its member-societies.
Ellam says Touré told him that it's important for IARU to "continue its good
work in the ITU," adding that the IARU "has an important role to play in the
future."

Addressing the conference after the vote, Touré told the 1500 delegates from
around the world that he would work with transparency, objectivity and vigor
to realize the two main objectives that were central to his campaign: to
eliminate the digital divide and to ensure that cyberspace would become more
secure. Touré has served two terms as director of ITU's Telecommunication
Development Bureau.

Delegates elected Houlin Zhao of China as Deputy Secretary-General. He said
that he would do his best to assist the Secretary-General elect and the
three directors as well as the membership to make ITU a more dynamic
organization that would contribute to the emerging global Information
Society. ITU-Radiocommunication Bureau Director Valery Timofeev of the
Russian Federation was unopposed for re-election.

The "Plenipot" concludes November 24. For only the second time IARU
representatives will be among the Plenipot observers, with Ellam and
International Coordinator for Emergency Communications Hans Zimmermann,
HB9AQS/F5VKP, each present for half of the conference. Turkey's IARU member
society, Telsiz ve Radyo Amatörleri Cemiyeti (TRAC), has organized a
demonstration station and exhibit of Amateur Radio emergency communications
capabilities adjacent to the conference site.

The ultimate authority in the ITU, the Plenipot, held every four years, is
the occasion for representatives of ITU member states to consider proposed
changes to the organization's constitution and convention, adopt strategic
and financial plans and elect senior management.

[THIS WILL NEED UPDATING] Among candidates for the 12 seats on the part-time
Radio Regulations Board is Robert W. Jones, VE7RWJ. Plenipot 2006 delegates
also will consider changing the name of the ITU. Several Arab States have
submitted a Common Proposal to call it the "International Telecommunication
and Information Technology Union." — ITU; IARU

==>HAMS HEADED FOR SPACE

NASA and the Russian Federal Space Agency have named two astronauts and two
cosmonauts to make up the next International Space Station crew, Expedition
15. While their duty tours will not coincide, if the current schedule holds,
there will always be at least one US and one Russian radio amateur aboard
the ISS for the next year.

Astronauts Clayton Anderson, KD5PLA, and Daniel Tani, KD5TXE, will travel to
the station next year as flight engineers. Anderson will ride to the ISS
aboard shuttle Endeavour on mission STS-118, targeted for next June, and
he'll return to Earth on shuttle Atlantis on mission STS-120, which will
carry his replacement, Tani, to the station. Tani will return via the
shuttle in October 2007. Cosmonauts Fyodor Yurchikhin, RN3FI, and Oleg Kotov
will fly to the ISS next March on a Russian Soyuz spacecraft and will spend
six months aboard the orbiting laboratory.

Yurchikhin will command Expedition 15, and Kotov will serve as station
flight engineer and Soyuz commander.

Until Anderson arrives, astronaut Sunita Williams, KD5PLB, will serve as
Expedition 15's third crew member and flight engineer. She's scheduled to
fly to the ISS on shuttle Mission STS-116 in December. Williams is reported
to be eager to do ARISS school group contacts from NA1SS.

The same shuttle flight will carry European Space Agency astronaut Christer
Fuglesang, KE5CGR/SA0AFS, Sweden's first astronaut. He will serve as a
mission specialist on his first journey into space, an 11-day ISS
construction mission.

Plans are under way to arrange for Fuglesang to carry out an ARISS school
contact with students in Thunmanskolan located in Knivsta, Sweden. The
contact would be the first ARISS school QSO with Scandinavia.

==>SOLAR UPDATE

Heliophile Tad "Who Let the Spots Out?" Cook, K7RA, Seattle, Washington,
reports: This week saw the odd combination of average daily sunspot number
declining while the solar flux rose. It isn't so odd for this to happen
when there are very few sunspots, and one rises slightly while the other
declines slightly. But this time, the solar flux rose quite a bit. Average
daily sunspot number dropped nearly 19 points to 27.7, and average daily
solar flux rose over 8 points to 94.3. There is a big sunspot number 923,
currently moving off center to the western limb. This sunspot is so large
that it could be seen unaided at sunset, although this is not safe viewing.
Perhaps this spot radiated plenty of energy at 2.8 GHz (the frequency at
which solar flux is measured), but the combined area and number of spots
didn't make a high sunspot number.

Conditions should be good this weekend, although today (November 17)
unsettled geomagnetic activity is expected. After today geomagnetic
conditions should stabilize. Predicted planetary A indices for November
17-20 is 15, 10, 5 and 5. Geophysical Institute Prague predicts unsettled
to active conditions for November 17, unsettled November 18, quiet to
unsettled November 19, quiet November 20-22, and quiet to unsettled on
November 23.

The predicted solar flux is 95 through the weekend. This is relatively high
for this point in the sunspot cycle. If we had zero sunspots we would
expect to see the solar flux nearly 30 points lower, around 67.

For more information concerning radio propagation, see the ARRL Technical
Information Service at http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/propagation.html. For a
detailed explanation of the numbers used in this bulletin, see
http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/k9la-prop.html. An archive of past propagation
bulletins is at http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/prop/.

Sunspot numbers for November 9 through 15 were 29, 13, 13, 18, 30, 41 and 50
with a mean of 27.7. 10.7 cm flux was 89.4, 91.1, 97, 96.7, 95.2, 94.5, and
96.1, with a mean of 94.3. Estimated planetary A indices were 10, 36, 20, 7,
2, 4 and 5 with a mean of 12. Estimated mid-latitude A indices were 7, 29,
20, 9, 1, 3 and 6, with a mean of 10.7.

____

==>IN BRIEF:

* This weekend on the radio: The ARRL November Sweepstakes (SSB), the NA
Collegiate ARC Championship (SSB), SARL Field Day, the LZ DX Contest, the
EUCW Fraternizing CW QSO Party, the All-Austrian 160-Meter Contest, the RSGB
Second 1.8 MHz Contest (CW), the EU PSK63 QSO Party are the weekend of
November 18-19. The Run for the Bacon QRP Contest is November 20. JUST
AHEAD: The CQ Worldwide DX Contest (CW) is the weekend of November 25-26.
The ARCI Topband Sprint is November 30 (UTC). The ARRL 160-Meter Contest,
the EU-PSK QRP Contest, the TARA RTTY Melee, the Wake-Up! QRP Sprint, and
the TOPS Activity Contest are the weekend of December 2-3. See the ARRL
Contest Branch page <http://www.arrl.org/contests/> and the WA7BNM Contest
Calendar <http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/index.html> for more info.
See the ARRL Contest Branch page <http://www.arrl.org/contests/> and the
WA7BNM Contest Calendar <http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/index.html>
for more info.

* ARRL Certification and Continuing Education course registration:
Registration remains open through Sunday, December 3, for these ARRL
Certification and Continuing Education (CCE) online courses beginning
Friday, December 15: Amateur Radio Emergency Communications Level 2
(EC-002), Amateur Radio Emergency Communications Level 3 (EC-003R2), Antenna
Modeling (EC-004), HF Digital Communications (EC-005), VHF/UHF -- Life
Beyond the Repeater (EC-008), and Radio Frequency Propagation (EC-011).
These courses will also open for registration Friday, December 1, for
classes beginning Friday, January 19, 2007. To learn more, visit the CCE
Course Listing page <http://www.arrl.org/cce/courses.html> or contact the
CCE Department <cce@arrl.org>.

* Celebrate a Birthday On the Air!
Well-known contester and DXer Martti Laine, OH2BH, is getting ready to
celebrate his 60th birthday Sunday, November 19. Since his friends are
scattered in every corner of the world, a unique concept is underway. Just
dress up for the occasion, switch on your radio and you will find yourself
at the most thrilling birthday party ever. The birthday event will begin
November 18 at 0000 UTC and run for 48 hours until November 19, 2006 2359
UTC -- the 19th being Martti's actual birthday. It will run on both CW and
SSB simultaneously, on frequencies .025 and .225 (such as 14.025 and
14.225), with powerful 4O60BH stations on a 600 meter high mountain perch
that overlooks Kotor Bay in Montenegro. The radio operations are led by
Ranko Boca, YT6A; Dragan Djordjevic, YT6Y, and others from near and far. But
that's not all -- you can pass on your birthday wishes to Martii personally
on the air. You can schedule appointment for the time of your choice on
14.225 kHz by sending a request to <sked-60@oh2bh.fi>. The birthday party
station will then call you at that exact minute. You can also send your
birthday greetings via e-mail to <msg-60@oh2bh.fi>. QSLs will be via OH2BN.
Each direct request will be honored by a special stamp released for the
occasion.

* DXpeditioning Basics available as a free ARRL download: Thinking about
going on a DXpedition? Then you might want to check out DXpeditioning
Basics, by ARRL Membership Services Manager Wayne Mills, N7NG, a DXpedition
veteran. The 26-page booklet covers DXpedition objectives, organization,
whom to work, pileup management, QSO mechanics, frustration management,
problems, and follow-up. If you have never been on a DXpedition before, this
guide will give you some real insight. While DXpeditioning Basics no longer
available in print, ARRL offers a free download
<http://www.arrl.org/awards/dxcc/dx-basics.pdf>.

* FCC classifies BPL-enabled Internet access as "information service": The
FCC has declared Broadband over Power Line (BPL)-enabled Internet access
service to be an information service. The November 3 Memorandum Opinion and
Order (MO&O)
<http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-165A1.pdf> in WC
Docket 06-10 places BPL-enabled Internet access service on an equal
regulatory footing with other broadband services, such as cable modem and
DSL. BPL proponent the United Power Line Council had asked the Commission
last December to issue a declaratory ruling in the matter. The FCC said
competition among broadband services providers will provide consumers with
more and better services at lower prices. "The Commission's broadband
statistics show that subscribers to BPL Internet access services, although
few in number overall, increased by nearly 200% in 2005," FCC Chairman Kevin
Martin said in a statement. Specifically, the MO&O finds that the
transmission component underlying BPL-enabled Internet access service is
"telecommunications," and that the approach it's adopted with respect to BPL
is consistent with the framework established for cable modem and wireline
broadband Internet service.

* UK authorities to permit experimental Internet/HF speech gateway: The
Radio Society of Great Britain (RSGB) <http://www.rsgb.org/> says UK
telecoms regulator Ofcom <http://www.ofcom.org.uk/> has granted a unique
Notice of Variation (NoV) to Steve Richards, G4HPE, to operate an
experimental Internet/HF speech gateway. The NoV would allow two-way
communication between the Internet and the Amateur Radio HF bands. The RSGB
assisted Richards in obtaining the authorization. "The purpose of the
research is to explore the many technical and operational challenges that
such a system poses for emergency communications," the RSGB said. "It is
also hoped that the project will shed light on how Internet-based networks
can aid Amateur Radio emergency communications." The NoV is a first in the
UK because it allows full frequency agility over the lower HF bands and the
use of significant power levels, the RSGB said. According to the Society,
the gateway is not intended as a permanent Amateur Radio Service facility
and will likely only be operated on a predetermined test schedule. Only
Amateur Radio licenses will have access the gateway, which will be fully
attended at all times. The International Radio Emergency Support Coalition
(IRESC) <http://www.iresc.org/> -- a worldwide group of radio amateurs who
use voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) facilities to connect disaster areas
to points of support -- also is involved in this project.

* Great thing to do for our troops: If you go to the Web site
<http://www.letssaythanks.com>, you can pick out a thank you card. Xerox
Corporation will print it, and it will be sent (at no charge) to a soldier
currently serving in Iraq. You can't pick who gets it, but it will go to a
member of the armed services. -- tnx Coy Day, N5OK


================================================== =========
The ARRL Letter is published Fridays, 50 times each year, by the American
Radio Relay League: ARRL--the National Association For Amateur Radio, 225
Main St, Newington, CT 06111; tel 860-594-0200; fax 860-594-0259;
<http://www.arrl.org>. Joel Harrison, W5ZN, President.

The ARRL Letter offers a weekly e-mail digest of essential and general news
of interest to active radio amateurs. Visit the ARRL Web site
<http://www.arrl.org> for the latest Amateur Radio news and news updates.
The ARRL Web site <http://www.arrl.org/> also offers informative features
and columns. ARRL Audio News <http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/audio/> is a
weekly "ham radio newscast" compiled and edited from The ARRL Letter. It's
also available as a podcast from our Web site.

Material from The ARRL Letter may be republished or reproduced in whole or
in part in any form without additional permission. Credit must be given to
The ARRL Letter/American Radio Relay League.

==>Delivery problems (ARRL member direct delivery only!):
letter-dlvy@arrl.org
==>Editorial questions or comments: Rick Lindquist, N1RL, n1rl@arrl.org
==>ARRL News on the Web: <http://www.arrl.org>
==>ARRL Audio News: <http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/audio/> or call
860-594-0384

==>How to Get The ARRL Letter

The ARRL Letter is available to ARRL members free of charge directly from
ARRL HQ. To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your address for e-mail
delivery:
ARRL members first must register on the Members Only Web Site
<http://www.arrl.org/members/>. You'll have an opportunity during
registration to sign up for e-mail delivery of The ARRL Letter, W1AW
bulletins, and other material. To change these selections--including
delivery of The ARRL Letter--registered members should click on the "Member
Data Page" link (in the Members Only box). Click on "Modify membership
data," check or uncheck the appropriate boxes and/or change your e-mail
address if necessary. (Check "Temporarily disable all automatically sent
email" to temporarily stop all e-mail deliveries.) Then, click on "Submit
modification" to make selections effective. (NOTE: HQ staff members cannot
change your e-mail delivery address. You must do this yourself via the
Members Only Web Site.)

The ARRL Letter also is available to all, free of charge, from these
sources:

* ARRLWeb <http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/>. (NOTE: The ARRL Letter will be
posted each Friday when it is distributed via e-mail.)

* The QTH.net listserver, thanks to volunteers from the Boston Amateur Radio
Club: Visit Mailing Lists@QTH.Net
<http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/letter-list>. (NOTE: The ARRL
cannot assist subscribers who receive The ARRL Letter via this listserver.)

w5alt
11-18-2006, 06:03 PM
Quote[/b] (aa7bq @ Nov. 18 2006,12:47)]==> AMATEUR RADIO "OMNIBUS" RULES CHANGES TO GO INTO EFFECT DECEMBER 15
...
Still to be resolved are three controversial aspects of the Proceeding:
Dunno about the ARRL, but I think the FCC resolved those issues by publishing the rules in the Federal Register. Did I miss something?

73,
Walt, W5ALT

w4oaf
11-19-2006, 03:51 AM
I think the FCC missed something when they #passed these new changes.
Since the code speed for Extras and Generals have been dropped to 5 wpm and there are many Advanced and Generals out here that passed the 13wpm code test by sitting in front of an FCC Examiner and not a VE why did #the FCC not open up the #bottom 25 Khz of 80,40,20,15 mtrs to everyone #that has CW priveledges now.
Seems that those that have gotten the extra class with a 5 wpm code test only are interested in #the phone portion of the bands.
If #the CW is done away with for all classes of license #will the bottom 25Khz still be restricted to only extra class licensees.?
Is it possible for the ARRL or someone who knows how to submit an NPRM to submit one for opening the bottom 25 khz of the 80.40,20,15 mtr bands to the Advanced and Generals now.

Ed Narwid W4OAF--ARRL Life Member

w5klb
11-19-2006, 04:39 AM
Mr.Narwid, W4OAF, who proclaims to be PROUD ARRL Life member sez:
Quote[/b] ]Seems that those that have gotten the extra class with a 5 wpm code test only are interested in #the phone portion of the bands.
And you, sir, are dead wrong making an assumption like that. There are PLENTY of "Extra Lites" who happen to like the "music" of CW. I happen to be one of them. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif

kb7uxe
11-19-2006, 06:10 AM
just keep calling cq on 3.696...

i'll be there....Even if your a 5wpm extra..

cul.

KQ6XA
11-19-2006, 12:46 PM
Quote[/b] (aa7bq @ Nov. 18 2006,09:47)]" The elimination of J2D emissions, data sent by modulating an SSB transmitter, of more than 500 Hz bandwidth. This will make PACTOR III at full capability illegal. Other digital modes effectively rendered illegal
below 30 MHz include Olivia and MT63 (when operated at bandwidths greater than 500 Hz), 1200-baud packet, Q15X25 and Clover 2000."
UPDATE 22 NOV 2006
From the ARRL website:
FCC Working to Correct Error in Omnibus Rules Change Order

"-- In the recently released R&O 04-140 -- the "Omnibus" rules
changes affecting the Amateur Radio Service -- the FCC inadvertently
limited J2D emissions to 500 Hz bandwidth. We are happy to report
that the FCC is working on an erratum to correct the J2D error. While
nothing is certain until the erratum is actually released, it is fair
to say that the FCC recognizes the problem and intends to fix it prior
to the December 15 effective date of the new rules. We will post
further information on the erratum as it becomes available."

-------------

It seems that many hams, including ARRL (and myself) were confused by the initial reports and ARRL synopsis of the R&O and the ruling. That is not surprising, since the FCC actions were poorly written, self-contradictory, and unclear.

But, the new FCC definition of "Data" does not have the effect that some thought it had, from the first news.

To all the sadistic operators wishing for the death of Pactor-3... please be advised that rumors of its demise are premature! http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif Pactor-3 remains legal under the new rules, as it always has been! In fact, Pactor-1 may now be used to transmit photos in the "data" subbands http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

If one looks at the emission designator list, it can help better understand which common ham modes are affected or not affected by the new FCC rules.

PACTOR-3 is DBPSK or DQPSK, and the emission designator is G1D for data, or G1B for text, or G1C for images. PACTOR-3 continues to be legal on HF under the new rules.

The 500Hz Bandwidth rule does not apply to G1D (Pactor-3 data).
The 500Hz Bandwidth rule does not apply to G1B (Pactor-3 text).

If you view the wording of the FCC rule in the context of
the FCC R&O, you will find that FCC never intended to apply the 500Hz bandwidth limit to the fast data emission types hams have been using for many years. The 500Hz bandwidth limit only applies to images sent in the data subbands. I realize that the placement of semicolons and commas, and re-phrasing of the word "emissions" can be read in different ways. However, we already have the verbatum intent of FCC as published in their R&O as the FCC guideline for interpretation of this part of the rule:

First, read FCC's own words published in the R&O:
"19 ...To accommodate the concern raised by ARRL, however, we will revise our rules to clarify that the 500 Hz limitation applies only to the emission types we are adding to the definition of data when transmitted on amateur service frequencies below 30 MHz. By amending the rule in this manner, the 500 bandwidth limitation will not apply to other data emission types or amateur service bands in which a higher symbol rate or bandwidth currently is permitted."

Now, in light of that FCC statement as a guideline, read the FCC definition of "Data" in the new omnibus rules:

"(2) Data. Telemetry, telecommand and computer communications emissions having designators with A, C, D, F, G, H, J or R as the first symbol; 1 as the second symbol; D as the third symbol, and emissions A1C, F1C, F2C, J2C, J3C, and J2D* having an occupied bandwidth of 500 Hz or less when transmitted on an amateur service frequency below 30 MHz. Only a digital code of a type specifically authorized in this part may be transmitted."
[ Note: J2D error is being corrected by FCC]

Emission Designators for Common Amateur Radio Digital Data / Text / Fax

Frequency Modulated
RTTY (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
MFSK (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
ALE (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
PACTOR (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
PACKET (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
FSK31 (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
8FSK DTM ARQ (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
8FSK DBM ARQ (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
FMHELL (FSK) = F1B / F1C

Phase Modulated
BPSK31 (PSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
QPSK31 (QPSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
PSK63 (PSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
Q15X25 (QPSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
MT63 (DBPSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
PACTORII (DPSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
PACTORIII (DBPSK or DQPSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
MIL-STD 188-110 (PSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C

Amplitude and Angle Modulated Simultaneously
Olivia (AMFSK) = D1D / D1B / D1C
OFDM (AMPSK) = D1D / D1B / D1C

Duration or Position Modulated
FELDHELL (PWM) = L1B / L1C
FELDHELL (PPM) = M1B / M1C

Case closed.

73---Bonnie Crystal KQ6XA


.

W1AWB
11-19-2006, 12:55 PM
Quote[/b] (w5klb @ Nov. 18 2006,21:39)]Quote[/b] ]Seems that those that have gotten the extra class with a 5 wpm code test only are interested in the phone portion of the bands.
And you, sir, are dead wrong making an assumption like that. There are PLENTY of "Extra Lites" who happen to like the "music" of CW. I happen to be one of them. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
[QUOTE]

Agreed. Yes I passed the 5 wpm code test and got my Extra 4+ years ago. I operate comfortably over 30 wpm most evenings on 80 meter CW. I have worked hard to be a good CW op and find these assumptions insulting.

Andy Extra Lite W1AWB

K9FV
11-19-2006, 01:28 PM
Quote[/b] (W1AWB @ Nov. 19 2006,06:55)][QUOTE=Quote ]Seems that those that have gotten the extra class with a 5 wpm code test only are interested in #the phone portion of the bands.
And you, sir, are dead wrong making an assumption like that. There are PLENTY of "Extra Lites" who happen to like the "music" of CW. I happen to be one of them. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
Quote[/b] ]

Agreed. Yes I passed the 5 wpm code test and got my Extra 4+ years ago. I operate comfortably over 30 wpm most evenings on 80 meter CW. I have worked hard to be a good CW op and find these assumptions insulting.

# # # # # # Andy Extra Lite W1AWB
Thank you "extra lites" for making your posts of your love of CW.... #While I am not a 5 wpm, I'm still sorta an "extra lite" cause I only passed the 13wpm back in the early 90's. #At that time CW was simply a stumbling block, but in the last 4 yrs or so I've developed an enjoyment of code. #Funny how that happens, when something is "required" - it is not liked at all, but once it becomes a matter of personal choice, it becomes fun...

Didn't wish to turn this into a code vs no-code thread, just wished to thank the "extra lites" who enjoy code.

73 de Ken H.

w4oaf
11-19-2006, 07:29 PM
I guess I did not explain very clearly- Yes there are many Extras that have started to like the code as it is shown here with the replys to my original post.
But then to there are many that only passed the 5 wpm test to gain the expanded phone priveledges and will even tell you they never liked the code to begin with and can't copy or send it now.
I am from the old times when we had to also show profiency in not only copy but also sending in front of the FCC Examiners.

That was before the Incentive Licensing took place.

Those of you that are the 5wpm extras that have taken the effort to use CW and improve your code speeds I aplogize for mistakenly putting you in the class of those that just like to work phone.
I also am well above the 20 wpm that originally was the speed for Extras and I concentrate my operating to over 90% on CW.

It was not my intention to start a Code vs No code here but just to point out that the lower 25 KHZ should be open to all now that the phone bands are being expanded to suit those that use phone alot and the code speed has been lowered or even possibly eliminated.

If it is eliminated you will find alot less people even attempting to learn the code.

Ham radio has many facets to it and there is something for us all. I happen to like CW wheras others may like Phone or digital as the main mode.
There is a place for us all.

73s KEEP CW ALIVE- It is REAL HAM RADIO

Ed

gw0nnb
11-19-2006, 08:35 PM
So what's the deal? CW frequencies being squashed again for more phone and then bandwidth restrictions on data? Makes me wonder why, when there aren't anwhere near the number of us there used to be, and the Internet
is killing the hobby's attraction and also the number of people listening to any kind of radio at all, what kind of pipe they've been smoking at the ITU conference. Also, for the record, when the 12 WPM minimum test that Region 1 had when I sat my CW, full operating privaleges were something you had to work harder at than appears to be the case now - but contrary to the opinion og some board posters, there's a LOT of sub-10 wpm CW traffic on the HF bands, which makes me believe that the majority of 5 wpm-ers are active in CW - and that's a good thing. When I was first licensed at 14, most everyone going for a full class license wanted to experiment with HF packet, and very few of the people I met who weren't "Old Timers" QSO'd in morse. CW has been to this day, the only mode of QSO I have employed, although I do intend on using some SSB and AM when I don't have to care about RFI so much. And yes, I did say AM, hihi

de w3/gw0nnb e e

w4oaf
11-19-2006, 09:05 PM
Yes it does seem that the internet is taking the place of Ham radio to some degree- But we should also remember that there is a place for the Internet within Ham radio. we have these websites like right here qrz.com as well as the DX cluster ones and those to post items for sale also to check equipment specs etc etc. There is alot that the Internet offers Ham radio as well as others. Unfortunatly it also offers alot that does not have to be there and has no purpose in everyday life for even non hams.
I also operated AM in the late 50s and early 60s then the new mode of DSB (Double Side Band) before SSB became a reality. We as Novices were restricted to 75 Watts and crystal control and CW only with a one year license. No upgrade aftera year no more license.

The only phone the Novice had was an AM segment on 2mtrs.
Then as the technology started to improve Ham radio also had to change with it and here we are today. It makes you wonder where it will be 10 years from now.
With the comming of Cell Phones and the low cost to have and use them will Ham radio be a thing of the past eventually. I hope not as it is still fun and a way of meeting new people around the world and possibly making friends with some of them.
What chance do you have making friends worldwide with a cell phone?http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif?http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif???

There are many good things about Ham Radio it has alot to offer all of us and if we do not like a certain mode well we do not have to use it.

Its a good Hobby -Lets all strive together worldwide to keep it a good hobby. This can be done if we all pull together as we all have the same interest HAM RADIO.

Ed W4OAF

W0JBC
11-19-2006, 09:33 PM
It's just wonderful ...

Let's get into the bragidosia ...

Not everyone will be happy.....


Another code thread - a -brewin' ...


I don't care anymore since '91.....


JB

kd6fyk
11-19-2006, 09:33 PM
Now the 5wpm extras are fighting with the 20wpm extras...
Just lose the code testing and ham radio might not die.

kf4vgx
11-19-2006, 10:15 PM
Amateurs will argue over anything.
Egotisms comes to mind http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif .
Seems we amateurs carry a bit more than the average person, in that department.

I like my eggs scrambled you may like yours fried or boiled, well you get the drift. Different taste for different folks.
..
No one should be the judge of how one enjoys their hobby. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif


Just enjoy!

http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif

w4oaf
11-19-2006, 11:10 PM
I fully agree lets just all enjoy our hobby there is enough diversity in it that we can all enjoy something.
And just think this all started because I made a comment that the bottom 25 KHZ should be opend to everyone on 80,40,20,15 now that the code had been dropped to 5 wpm and possibly soon it will be eliminated.
since the FCC wants to expand the Phone bands. Why not also expand the CW bands as there are still pleanty of us that like to work CW.
Lets not let this turn into that crazy 20 mtr fiasco on 14.313 that we had several years ago with all the bickering and fighting that went on there. That is one reason I like to work mostly CW it seems friendlier there than portions of the phone bands with people not showing respect and trying to jam everyone and name calling etc etc.
It happens every day someplace.
Now we are off the initial posting of the ARRL Letter
.My original post was based on the contents of that letter.

Ed W4OAF

w5klb
11-20-2006, 02:25 AM
Quote[/b] (kd6fyk @ Nov. 19 2006,14:33)]Now the 5wpm extras are fighting with the 20wpm extras...
Just lose the code testing and ham radio might not die.
Okay, enough is enough. The last thing I wanted was to turn this into another code/no code ambient air temperature equine. I'm sure all of us who have posted here a long time have seen enough of those kinds of threads to make us puke. I also imagine that it's drove the moderators frayed ends of santiy trying keep members from each other's throats.

My point to orginally to Ed, OAF was that it seemed he was painting all of us Extra Lites with the same brush. But he's done of good job explaining himself on that point. Thank you Ed.

Now, can we forget about this "code/no code thing" for awhile? There are far better things to talk about in the in the ARRL letter Fred has posted.

Let's MoveOn.

N6TPT
11-20-2006, 04:47 AM
Let's keep in mind that we haven't lost any CW spectrum. #CW is legal on all amateur frequencies. #All that has happened is that more spectrum is available for SSB operation (as of December 15). #The real concern is the 80 meter spectrum for data modes. #I'm sure that will get straightened out.

W0JBC
11-20-2006, 05:37 AM
TPT get your head out of the sand...

w5alt
11-20-2006, 03:33 PM
Ghery, you and I haven't lost any CW spectrum, but the General class ticket holders certainly have! What is now CW/digital spectrum for General class will shortly be Extra class phone spectrum.

73,
Walt, W5ALT

k7unz
11-20-2006, 07:19 PM
So much for "incentive licensing".......

Life was so much simpler before, and never the same since.

An opinion.....

73, Jim/k7unz

W9WHE
11-20-2006, 10:48 PM
Hensley (N4ROS) states:

"…an Amateur Radio license no longer fosters respect from community and national leaders".

NO fooling?
You don't suppose that's because of constant DUMBING DOWN of the standards, so that your average ham is rapidly becoming little more then an appliance operator, now do you? Thank you, arrl http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif


+++++++++++



"She went on to acknowledge that ARRL membership is declining, and leadership positions are "…filled by default because few want to serve. More is required than smiling faces behind a hamfest table to solve these problems."

My god!
You mean that if arrl is going to stem declining membership, it might actually have to LISTEN TO ITS OWN PAYING MEMBERS? Worse yet, arrl might actually have to do what its paying membership wants? ;)

NAAAHHHHHHH.....who would do a silly thing like that? Certainly NOT arrl!
Afterall, arrl knows what is best for you, even if you are too stupid to know it. Now sit down, shut up, and send in more money.

wb5yiw
11-20-2006, 11:37 PM
Quote[/b] (K9FV @ Nov. 19 2006,00:28)]Didn't wish to turn this into a code vs no-code thread, just wished to thank the "extra lites" who enjoy code.

73 de Ken H.
Ken,

You can't post ANYTHING on this forum that doesn't disintegrate into a code vs. no-code debate. I haven't logged on to this site in weeks, and except for the titles, nothing has changed. Same arguments, almost the same words. Oh, the names and call signs change from time to time, but that's all.

I actually believe that if someone just logged on and posted "It's a lovely day", that within 5 or 10 replies not only would it not be a lovely day, it would be the fault of dumbed down tests and the removal of the code requirements.

Sheesh people...why did I even look?

W0JBC
11-21-2006, 12:06 AM
YIW .... you are one who gawks while driving past a traffic accident or a train wreck.... You HAD to make your opinion known , having already read previous posts... Thats OK ..

Don't look anymore ... Save yourself from the stress...

Good Luck

WD8AQS
11-21-2006, 04:00 AM
Quote[/b] (w5alt @ Nov. 20 2006,08:33)]Ghery, you and I haven't lost any CW spectrum, but the General class ticket holders certainly have! What is now CW/digital spectrum for General class will shortly be Extra class phone spectrum.

73,
Walt, W5ALT
Us Generals gained 125KHz phone and lost 150KHz CW, a loss of 25KHz of usable spectrum.
http://www2.arrl.org/announce/regulatory/wt04-140/Hambands3_color.pdf

K4JF
11-21-2006, 04:45 AM
Quote[/b] (w4oaf @ Nov. 18 2006,15:05)]With the comming of Cell Phones and the low cost to have and use them will Ham radio be a thing of the past eventually. I hope not as #it is still #fun and a way of meeting new people around the world and possibly making friends with some of them.
What chance do you have making friends worldwide with a cell phone?http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif?http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif???
Ed W4OAF
You are right, Ed, about the non-existant chance of making friends worldwide with a cell phone. #

That's why I disagree with your theory that cell phones will kill ham radio. #Wired phones didn't, and cells are just 2-way radios hooked into the phone line. #The operation is no different than home phones, and they have been around longer than ham radio!

A cell phone is a utility, not a hobby, no different than wired home phones in the final result - just making it more convenient to contact people we already know. #You can't CQ with one, you can't meet new people with one, you can't build one and link directly with somebody far away... etc.

Long live ham RADIO.

NL7W
11-21-2006, 07:26 AM
Quote[/b] (KQ6XA @ Nov. 19 2006,05:46)]Quote[/b] (aa7bq @ Nov. 18 2006,09:47)]" The elimination of J2D emissions, data sent by modulating an SSB transmitter, of more than 500 Hz bandwidth. This will make PACTOR III at full capability illegal. Other digital modes effectively rendered illegal
below 30 MHz include Olivia and MT63 (when operated at bandwidths greater than 500 Hz), 1200-baud packet, Q15X25 and Clover 2000."
It seems that many hams, including ARRL (and myself) were confused by the initial reports and ARRL synopsis of the R&O and the ruling. That is not surprising, since the FCC actions were poorly written, self-contradictory, and unclear.

But, the new FCC definition of "Data" does not have the effect that some thought it had, from the first news.

To all the sadistic operators wishing for the death of Pactor-3... please be advised that rumors of its demise are premature! http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif Pactor-3 remains legal under the new rules, as it always has been! In fact, Pactor-1 may now be used to transmit photos in the "data" subbands http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

If one looks at the emission designator list, it can help better understand which common ham modes are affected or not affected by the new FCC rules. I don't see any common digital data modes being used by hams that are using J2D. It seems that ARRL and everyone else were worried about the J2D limit of 500Hz over nothing.

PACTOR-3 is DBPSK or DQPSK, and the emission designator is G1D for data, or G1B for text, or G1C for images. Pactor is not J2D. PACTOR-3 continues to be legal on HF under the new rules.

The 500Hz Bandwidth rule does not apply to G1D (Pactor-3 data).
The 500Hz Bandwidth rule does not apply to G1B (Pactor-3 text).

If you view the wording of the FCC rule in the context of
the FCC R&O, you will find that FCC never intended to apply the 500Hz bandwidth limit to the fast data emission types hams have been using for many years. The 500Hz bandwidth limit only applies to images sent in the data subbands. I realize that the placement of semicolons and commas, and re-phrasing of the word "emissions" can be read in different ways. However, we already have the verbatum intent of FCC as published in their R&O as the FCC guideline for interpretation of this part of the rule:

First, read FCC's own words published in the R&O:
"19 ...To accommodate the concern raised by ARRL, however, we will revise our rules to clarify that the 500 Hz limitation applies only to the emission types we are adding to the definition of data when transmitted on amateur service frequencies below 30 MHz. By amending the rule in this manner, the 500 bandwidth limitation will not apply to other data emission types or amateur service bands in which a higher symbol rate or bandwidth currently is permitted."

Now, in light of that FCC statement as a guideline, read the FCC definition of "Data" in the new omnibus rules:

"(2) Data. Telemetry, telecommand and computer communications emissions having designators with A, C, D, F, G, H, J or R as the first symbol; 1 as the second symbol; D as the third symbol, and emissions A1C, F1C, F2C, J2C, J3C, and J2D having an occupied bandwidth of 500 Hz or less when transmitted on an amateur service frequency below 30 MHz. Only a digital code of a type specifically authorized in this part may be transmitted."

Emission Designators for Common Amateur Radio Digital Data / Text / Fax

Frequency Modulated
RTTY (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
MFSK (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
ALE (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
PACTOR (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
PACKET (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
FSK31 (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
8FSK DTM ARQ (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
8FSK DBM ARQ (FSK) = F1D / F1B / F1C
FMHELL (FSK) = F1B / F1C

Phase Modulated
BPSK31 (PSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
QPSK31 (QPSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
PSK63 (PSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
Q15X25 (QPSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
MT63 (DBPSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
PACTORII (DPSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
PACTORIII (DBPSK or DQPSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C
MIL-STD 188-110 (PSK) = G1D / G1B / G1C

Amplitude and Angle Modulated Simultaneously
Olivia (AMFSK) = D1D / D1B / D1C
OFDM (AMPSK) = D1D / D1B / D1C

Duration or Position Modulated
FELDHELL (PWM) = L1B / L1C
FELDHELL (PPM) = M1B / M1C

Case closed.

73---Bonnie Crystal KQ6XA


.
Bonnie,

You are creative!

Please go on believing these ITU designators apply to your digital data modulating a suppressed carrier, single-sideband HF radio. A pink ticket will be waiting for you; are you not using your SSB transceiver for your digital modes of all kinds?

Remember:

500 Hz is the bandwidth limit for all recognized digital modes on HF.

It's simply stated now. Oh, you can review ITU emission designations at:

http://life.itu.int/radioclub/rr/ap01.htm

73.

N3JI
11-21-2006, 07:38 PM
Quote[/b] (k7unz @ Nov. 20 2006,13:19)]So much for "incentive licensing.......

Life was so much simpler before, and never the same since.

An opinion.....

73, Jim/k7unz
Seems to me that "Simple" is "Here are your band limits -- stay in 'em and don't QRM each other!". That's about as simple as it gets. Wonder when that's coming??

(Frankly, I'd look forward to it, as in the 160m bandplan)

Joe, N3JI

KI4PEQ
11-22-2006, 01:45 AM
As far as just about every thread on this forum turning into a b*tch fest, I think we can scientifically prove that many males on this forum DO suffer from P.M.S. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

K4JF
11-22-2006, 03:24 AM
Quote[/b] (N3JI @ Nov. 20 2006,13:38)]Seems to me that "Simple" is "Here are your band limits -- stay in 'em and don't QRM each other!". #That's about as simple as it gets. #Wonder when that's coming??

Joe, N3JI
That's already the rule, Joe. What is the problem? It's real easy, as I see it.

(A lot easier than this daily relogging - going back to email and getting the password, cut, back to QRZ, paste in, it's getting tiresome....)

k9dy
11-22-2006, 04:36 AM
<<You don't suppose that's because of constant DUMBING DOWN of the standards, so that your average ham is rapidly becoming little more then an appliance operator, now do you? >>

Most of us have become "appliance operators" because not many of us are professional engineers, or have elaborate test equipment to deal with the complexities of building or maintaining modern gear.

We must get new and younger people into the hobby, but I agree the "dumbing down" has an effect on the quality some of the newbies. NOTE: I did not say all, and not all our problems are caused by new hams. However, the availibility of the question pool and practice questions has just made "knowledge" a matter of memorization. Couple this with "no code" and it is getting ridiculously easy. We need a simple entry class, with interesting privileges, but we also need the higher classes licenses to be a bit more of a challenge. It used to take months of hard study to pass the Tech/General or above exams, because the actual test questions were a closely guarded secret, and you had to have some knowledge of the subject to pass. I am proof it could be done. I passed my General and Advanced in 1970 at the same FCC session after 3 months of studying the theory and practicing code. I mention this because I had ZERO electrical background prior to wanting my license. You just have to have the desire to put out the effort. Things you work for have much more value and gain more respect and self-esteem.

W0JBC
11-22-2006, 05:00 AM
K9DY, Steve. Since you were an advanced in the early seventies, how do you equate the advanced test then versus the extra test in 2000 ? I thought the advanced was a comprehensive killer of an exam back then... This is a serious question ....

I have seen and tested on line for the extra and without cracking a book, missed the thing by two questions.... Most questions were covered in the advanced exam back then ...... I am NOT a wizard .... It just seems that the extra isn't like it used to be.....

This just MY observation ...
I didn't ugrade to extra back in those days because I achieved what I wanted at the time ...

I would like your input ...

Thanks,

JB

KE4IKY
11-23-2006, 01:12 AM
Bonnie,

You are creative! #

Please go on believing these ITU designators apply to your digital data modulating a suppressed carrier, single-sideband HF radio. #A pink ticket will be waiting for you; are you not using your SSB transceiver for your digital modes of all kinds?

Remember:

500 Hz is the bandwidth limit for all recognized and unspecified digital modes on HF. #

It's simply stated now. #Oh, you can review ITU emission designations at:

http://life.itu.int/radioclub/rr/ap01.htm

73.

After reading the rules and order, I don't see how someone would get in trouble for using Pactor 3, all I saw was something about enableing image transmissions using 500hz bandwidths if they are transmitted as data wheere fax isn't wanted.

Any further explanation would be welcome. Thanks
Joel

NL7W
11-23-2006, 06:56 AM
Quote[/b] (KE4IKY @ Nov. 22 2006,18:12)]Bonnie,

You are creative!

Please go on believing these ITU designators apply to your digital data modulating a suppressed carrier, single-sideband HF radio. A pink ticket will be waiting for you; are you not using your SSB transceiver for your digital modes of all kinds?

Remember:

500 Hz is the bandwidth limit for all recognized digital modes on HF.

It's simply stated now. Oh, you can review ITU emission designations at:

http://life.itu.int/radioclub/rr/ap01.htm

73.

After reading the rules and order, I don't see how someone would get in trouble for using Pactor 3, all I saw was something about enableing image transmissions using 500hz bandwidths if they are transmitted as data wheere fax isn't wanted.

Any further explanation would be welcome. Thanks
Joel
Ok.

I support this W6EM quote:

"According to the Authorized Emissions section, codified at 97.305( c ), the following paragraphs are cited as the authorized specifications for HF data.

Below 28MHz:
97.307(f)(3) Only a RTTY or data emission using a specified digital code listed in Sec. 97.309(a) of this part may be transmitted. The symbol rate must not exceed 300 bauds, or for frequency-shift keying, the frequency shift between mark and space must not exceed 1 kHz.

28MHz:
97.307(f)(4) Only a RTTY or data emission using a specified digital code listed in Sec. 97.309(a) of this part may be transmitted. The symbol rate must not exceed 1200 bauds, or for frequency-shift keying, the frequency shift between mark and space must not exceed 1 kHz.

97.309(a) lists PacTOR as one of the specified modes. But, that is meant to be PacTOR I -- not II nor III as they are not fully published protocols."

Wider bandwidths and "unspecified codes" may be used starting on 50.1 MHz and above -- like Pactor III. But, users of "unspecified codes" must meet other stipulations as well. Consult the regs.

73.

N5PVL
11-23-2006, 02:20 PM
This R&O has encouraged me to study for the extra exam.

NL7W
11-23-2006, 04:38 PM
The latest twist regarding the R&O's data restriction story:

The League, on their website, is saying the FCC intends to generate an erratum regarding HF J2D bandwidth emissions.

We will see...

KE4IKY
11-23-2006, 05:29 PM
So am I correct in saying that the problem with Pactor 3 is that

1.There isn't enough information published about the protocol to monitor call signs and content.

2. They use voice bandwidths for digital communications
on frequencies that they shouldn't.

Just as another question.
What information about the protocol that hasn't been published already needs to be published to make the communications monitorable and legal.

The whole protocol description from SCS seems a little vague about some bit switching times. (at the least)

Thanks again.

Joel

w5cmp
11-23-2006, 06:07 PM
Quote[/b] (KE4IKY @ Nov. 23 2006,16:29)]So am I correct in saying that the problem with Pactor 3 is that

1.There isn't enough information published about the protocol to monitor call signs and content.

2. They use voice bandwidths for digital communications
on frequencies that they shouldn't.

Just as another question.
What information about the protocol that hasn't been published already needs to be published to make the communications monitorable and legal.

The whole protocol description from SCS seems a little vague about some bit switching times. (at the least)

Thanks again.

Joel
YOU GUY'S NEED TO GET A ! LIFE.

kb5wbh
11-23-2006, 06:12 PM
Hopefully they will put the auto subbands back in 80m somewhere below 3.600 and put the J2D mistake and frequency use to rest at the same time!

73
Mike kb5wbh

k8cpa
11-23-2006, 06:21 PM
Quote[/b] (KI4PEQ @ Nov. 20 2006,19:45)]As far as just about every thread on this forum turning into a b*tch fest, I think we can scientifically prove that many males on this forum DO suffer from P.M.S. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif too funny!

NL7W
11-23-2006, 06:31 PM
Quote[/b] (KE4IKY @ Nov. 23 2006,10:29)]So am I correct in saying that the problem with Pactor 3 is that

1.There isn't enough information published about the protocol to monitor call signs and content.

2. They use voice bandwidths for digital communications
on frequencies that they shouldn't.

Just as another question.
What information about the protocol that hasn't been published already needs to be published to make the communications monitorable and legal.

The whole protocol description from SCS seems a little vague about some bit switching times. (at the least)

Thanks again.

Joel
Hi,

At this point in time, we know Pactor III, and possibly Pactor II, are proprietary codes. One manufacturer (SCS) makes modems capable of employing these codes, and will not release the spectrum of technical data that would allow both hams and other commercial competitors to design compatible software and/or hardware.

About your numbered questions:

Question 1:
Callsigns could possibly be monitored if given via Morse, but communications content, most likely, cannot be deciphered unless one has the appropriate SCS modem.

Question 2:
Yes. Pactor III uses SSB voice bandwidths to communicate digital data.

Question 3:
That's a good question. I have not delved into the technical information release aspects. I'm sure others might be able to comment.

It remains my hope that proprietary, "unspecified codes" remain illegal on amateur radio. I am, with certainty, in favor of experimenting with fully published unspecified codes -- advancing the state of the art amongst hams.

73.

KE4IKY
11-24-2006, 01:53 AM
Quote[/b] (NL7W @ Nov. 23 2006,11:31)]Quote[/b] (KE4IKY @ Nov. 23 2006,10:29)]So am I correct in saying that the problem with Pactor 3 is that

1.There isn't enough information published about the protocol to monitor call signs and content.

2. They use voice bandwidths for digital communications
on frequencies that they shouldn't.

Just as another question.
What information about the protocol that hasn't been published already needs to be published to make the communications monitorable and legal.

The whole protocol description from SCS seems a little vague about some bit switching times. (at the least)

Thanks again.

Joel
Hi,

At this point in time, we know Pactor III, and possibly Pactor II, are proprietary codes. #One manufacturer (SCS) makes modems capable of these employing these codes, and will not release the spectrum of technical data that would allow both hams and other commercial competitors to design compatible software and/or hardware. #

About your numbered questions:

Question 1:
Callsigns could possibly be monitored if given via Morse, but communications content, most likely, cannot be deciphered unless one has the appropriate SCS modem.

Question 2:
Yes. #Pactor III uses SSB voice bandwidths to communicate digital data.

Question 3:
That's a good question. #I have not delved into the technical information release aspects. #I'm sure others might be able to comment.

It remains my hope that proprietary, "unspecified codes" remain illegal on amateur radio. #I am, with certainty, in favor of experimenting with fully published unspecified codes -- advancing the state of the art amongst hams.

73.
Well said, I appreciate the straight response.

I'm interested in how all of this will turn out.

(There seems to be a lot of background noise on some of the postings, I guess even if a bar full of drunks wont listen to a person, the internet (and unfortunately ham radio) make for a place where a socially impaired person can think that they are being listened to and pretend to make a contribution to a discussion).

no offense intended to drinkers or the socially impaired.

MAybe if we all make more of an effort to be polite and constuctive, everything will be better.

Thanks again.

73
Joel

NL7W
11-24-2006, 09:08 AM
Quote[/b] (KE4IKY @ Nov. 23 2006,18:53)]Quote[/b] (NL7W @ Nov. 23 2006,11:31)]Quote[/b] (KE4IKY @ Nov. 23 2006,10:29)]So am I correct in saying that the problem with Pactor 3 is that

1.There isn't enough information published about the protocol to monitor call signs and content.

2. They use voice bandwidths for digital communications
on frequencies that they shouldn't.

Just as another question.
What information about the protocol that hasn't been published already needs to be published to make the communications monitorable and legal.

The whole protocol description from SCS seems a little vague about some bit switching times. (at the least)

Thanks again.

Joel
Hi,

At this point in time, we know Pactor III, and possibly Pactor II, are proprietary codes. One manufacturer (SCS) makes modems capable of these employing these codes, and will not release the spectrum of technical data that would allow both hams and other commercial competitors to design compatible software and/or hardware.

About your numbered questions:

Question 1:
Callsigns could possibly be monitored if given via Morse, but communications content, most likely, cannot be deciphered unless one has the appropriate SCS modem.

Question 2:
Yes. Pactor III uses SSB voice bandwidths to communicate digital data.

Question 3:
That's a good question. I have not delved into the technical information release aspects. I'm sure others might be able to comment.

It remains my hope that proprietary, "unspecified codes" remain illegal on amateur radio. I am, with certainty, in favor of experimenting with fully published unspecified codes -- advancing the state of the art amongst hams.

73.
Well said, I appreciate the straight response.

I'm interested in how all of this will turn out.

(There seems to be a lot of background noise on some of the postings, I guess even if a bar full of drunks wont listen to a person, the internet (and unfortunately ham radio) make for a place where a socially impaired person can think that they are being listened to and pretend to make a contribution to a discussion).

no offense intended to drinkers or the socially impaired.

MAybe if we all make more of an effort to be polite and constuctive, everything will be better.

Thanks again.

73
Joel
You'll notice qrz.com and eham.net have a "tough crowd" on occasion.

73.

wb4t
11-24-2006, 11:00 AM
Is there any news about relaxed ID rules for cross-band repeat in the new rule changes that go into effect Dec 15th?

k9dy
11-24-2006, 10:23 PM
JB:
You asked How would you equate the advanced test then versus the extra test in 2000 ?
----------------------------------------------------------------

I had to do some recollecting, since it has been awhile. I actually dug out my old study manual dated 1968 and glanced through it. There are lots of new technical subjects that did not exist on the test back then, for example: satellites, digital modes, digital circuits, transistorized circuits, more frequencies, etc. The old exam was a lot more comprehensive though, as I recall I even had to draw a couple of schematics.

The ARRL License Manual stated the differences in the exam pretty clearly:
“The questions on the following pages are those released by FCC as a study guide; ……… You may have two or more questions covering various facets of any single sample question. Also, the real test may turn a sample question “inside out”. Accordingly, you should be well-prepared: review the study questions of earlier chapters, and consult the Radio Amateur’s Handbook, Understanding Amateur Radio or any good radio textbook for those subjects which are not clear to you.” In other words, you’d better know the material because memorizing the answers won’t work.

Not having the exact questions to study was the hardest part compared to now. No “question pools”, no practice sites on the internet. Volunteer examiners are not nearly as intimidating as sitting in front of a stern FCC Field Engineer either. If you failed the code or theory you couldn’t apply for another 30 days, not like today when you can get an immediate “do over” if you pay another fee.

My opinion is that the written exams are similar in difficulty, but much easier to study for and to pass these days. I studied about 5 hours a day for 3 months solid in 1970 for the General/Advanced. I studied a couple of hours a day for 2 weeks for the Extra exam.

As a side note, as a prerequisite you had to be a General or Advanced for 2 years before you could take the Extra in those days.


Quote[/b] ]