View Full Version : Harry Reid, The New Democrat
"We are going to treat the minority, the Republicans, as they did not treat us. They'll be involved in decisions," Reid said. "I want to work with the president of the United States. I want to work with the Republican leader of the Senate, Republican leader of the House. We open our arms because we realize the only way to accomplish anything is on a bipartisan basis."
Wait while I get my hanky and wipe away my tears. #This guy is so sensitive to us poor republicans it breaks my heart wondering why he was out in the cold for so long. #Why we ignored him. #Sob, sob, Waaaahhhahh.
Quick, raise your hands if you think he is telling the truth. #Reid is actually a hit man for he dems. #Watch his actions along with the rest of the gang of 5.
K2WH
I'm still enjoying my honeymoon with the new Demorulers in Washington. Give me a month or so to start getting mad. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif
wa6ccw
11-14-2006, 11:51 PM
Quote[/b] (K2WH @ Nov. 15 2006,06:36)]"We are going to treat the minority, the Republicans, as they did not treat us. They'll be involved in decisions," Reid said. "I want to work with the president of the United States. I want to work with the Republican leader of the Senate, Republican leader of the House. We open our arms because we realize the only way to accomplish anything is on a bipartisan basis."
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/emoticons7/21.gif
Oh STOP Harry..... PLEASE!
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/emoticons7/24.gif
w2amr
11-14-2006, 11:53 PM
Quote[/b] (K2WH @ Nov. 14 2006,16:36)]"We are going to treat the minority, the Republicans, as they did not treat us. They'll be involved in decisions," Reid said. "I want to work with the president of the United States. I want to work with the Republican leader of the Senate, Republican leader of the House. We open our arms because we realize the only way to accomplish anything is on a bipartisan basis."
Wait while I get my hanky and wipe away my tears. #This guy is so sensitive to us poor republicans it breaks my heart wondering why he was out in the desert for so long. #Why we ignored him. #Sob, sob, Waaaahhhahh.
Quick, raise your hands if you think he is telling the truth. #What Reid really is is a hit man for he dems.
K2WH
Still hurting from that election, huh?
wa6ccw
11-14-2006, 11:58 PM
Quote[/b] (w2amr @ Nov. 15 2006,06:53)]Still hurting from that election, huh?
Not at all...
I can't speak for everyone else, but this is one Republican that thinks the GOP loss was a healthy thing. # http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif
Quote[/b] (w2amr @ Nov. 14 2006,12:53)]Quote[/b] (K2WH @ Nov. 14 2006,16:36)]"We are going to treat the minority, the Republicans, as they did not treat us. They'll be involved in decisions," Reid said. "I want to work with the president of the United States. I want to work with the Republican leader of the Senate, Republican leader of the House. We open our arms because we realize the only way to accomplish anything is on a bipartisan basis."
Wait while I get my hanky and wipe away my tears. #This guy is so sensitive to us poor republicans it breaks my heart wondering why he was out in the desert for so long. #Why we ignored him. #Sob, sob, Waaaahhhahh.
Quick, raise your hands if you think he is telling the truth. #What Reid really is is a hit man for he dems.
K2WH
Still hurting from that election, huh?
I'm not hurt but I do tend to agree with CCW, the stress is gone and now its the dems turn.
I think we will find out very quickly the entire country will be hurting from the election and the dems are now saying "Oh crap, what did we do".
This will be fun.
K2WH
K7DMB
11-15-2006, 12:12 AM
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/tounge.gif I live in Nevada, I have to put up this wacko every day http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/mad.gif
wa6ccw
11-15-2006, 12:28 AM
Quote[/b] (K2WH @ Nov. 15 2006,07:08)]Quote[/b] (w2amr @ Nov. 14 2006,12:53)]Quote[/b] (K2WH @ Nov. 14 2006,16:36)]"We are going to treat the minority, the Republicans, as they did not treat us. They'll be involved in decisions," Reid said. "I want to work with the president of the United States. I want to work with the Republican leader of the Senate, Republican leader of the House. We open our arms because we realize the only way to accomplish anything is on a bipartisan basis."
Wait while I get my hanky and wipe away my tears. #This guy is so sensitive to us poor republicans it breaks my heart wondering why he was out in the desert for so long. #Why we ignored him. #Sob, sob, Waaaahhhahh.
Quick, raise your hands if you think he is telling the truth. #What Reid really is is a hit man for he dems.
K2WH
Still hurting from that election, huh?
I'm not hurt but I do tend to agree with CCW, the stress is gone and now its the dems turn.
I think we will find out very quickly the entire country will be hurting from the election and the dems are now saying "Oh crap, what did we do".
This will be fun.
K2WH
I'm with you, WH...
What most of these fine left wing folks fail to realize is that this isn't a repeat of 1994 - a true revolution (of epic proportion, from sea to shining sea).
The GOP didn't get thrown out because they weren't acting enough like Shumer, Kennedy, Clinton, Durbin, et al. They got the boot because they betrayed the simple core Republican values of limited government, low/flat taxation, reined in spending and side issues like border security. It's just that simple.
But the Dems got their chance, so, as you aptly put it: this WILL be fun. #http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
w2amr
11-15-2006, 12:48 AM
Quote[/b] (wa6ccw @ Nov. 14 2006,17:28)]Quote[/b] (K2WH @ Nov. 15 2006,07:08)]Quote[/b] (w2amr @ Nov. 14 2006,12:53)]Quote[/b] (K2WH @ Nov. 14 2006,16:36)]"We are going to treat the minority, the Republicans, as they did not treat us. They'll be involved in decisions," Reid said. "I want to work with the president of the United States. I want to work with the Republican leader of the Senate, Republican leader of the House. We open our arms because we realize the only way to accomplish anything is on a bipartisan basis."
Wait while I get my hanky and wipe away my tears. #This guy is so sensitive to us poor republicans it breaks my heart wondering why he was out in the desert for so long. #Why we ignored him. #Sob, sob, Waaaahhhahh.
Quick, raise your hands if you think he is telling the truth. #What Reid really is is a hit man for he dems.
K2WH
Still hurting from that election, huh?
I'm not hurt but I do tend to agree with CCW, the stress is gone and now its the dems turn.
I think we will find out very quickly the entire country will be hurting from the election and the dems are now saying "Oh crap, what did we do".
This will be fun.
K2WH
I'm with you, WH...
What most of these fine left wing folks fail to realize is that this isn't a repeat of 1994 - a true revolution (of epic proportion, from sea to shining sea).
The GOP didn't get thrown out because they weren't acting enough like Shumer, Kennedy, Clinton, Durbin, et al. They got the boot because they betrayed the simple core Republican values of limited government, low/flat taxation, reined in spending and side issues like border security. It's just that simple.
Simple huh? You left out a few other reasons. Let me help you guys out. Ethics violations, criminal indictments, runaway spending, record deficits, and there was one more thing..... What was that? Oh yeah, I remember, A WAR. A war we were lied into.
wa6ccw
11-15-2006, 01:00 AM
Quote[/b] (w2amr @ Nov. 15 2006,07:48)]Quote[/b] (wa6ccw @ Nov. 14 2006,17:28)]Quote[/b] (K2WH @ Nov. 15 2006,07:08)]Quote[/b] (w2amr @ Nov. 14 2006,12:53)]Quote[/b] (K2WH @ Nov. 14 2006,16:36)]"We are going to treat the minority, the Republicans, as they did not treat us. They'll be involved in decisions," Reid said. "I want to work with the president of the United States. I want to work with the Republican leader of the Senate, Republican leader of the House. We open our arms because we realize the only way to accomplish anything is on a bipartisan basis."
Wait while I get my hanky and wipe away my tears. #This guy is so sensitive to us poor republicans it breaks my heart wondering why he was out in the desert for so long. #Why we ignored him. #Sob, sob, Waaaahhhahh.
Quick, raise your hands if you think he is telling the truth. #What Reid really is is a hit man for he dems.
K2WH
Still hurting from that election, huh?
I'm not hurt but I do tend to agree with CCW, the stress is gone and now its the dems turn.
I think we will find out very quickly the entire country will be hurting from the election and the dems are now saying "Oh crap, what did we do".
This will be fun.
K2WH
I'm with you, WH...
What most of these fine left wing folks fail to realize is that this isn't a repeat of 1994 - a true revolution (of epic proportion, from sea to shining sea).
The GOP didn't get thrown out because they weren't acting enough like Shumer, Kennedy, Clinton, Durbin, et al. They got the boot because they betrayed the simple core Republican values of limited government, low/flat taxation, reined in spending and side issues like border security. It's just that simple.
Simple huh? You #left out a few other reasons. Let me help you guys out. # Ethics violations, #criminal indictments, runaway spending, record deficits, and there was one more thing..... What was that? Oh yeah, I remember, A WAR. # A war we were lied into.
Ha, ha, ha, a "war we were lied into".... PLEASE (http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004-print.htm)...
When (oh when) are you angry leftys going to dispense with the hypocritical, self-righteous indignation? #http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif
And let's not mention a homo***ual predator.
Sour grapes come in many flavors. Amazing, the guy tosses out an olive branch and the right wants to crucify him for it. Just another reason the America is fed up with the right.
wa6ccw
11-15-2006, 01:05 AM
Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Nov. 15 2006,08:01)]And let's not mention a homo***ual predator.
WOW! You're absolutely right!
Uh... just like THIS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Studds) guy, huh?
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/emoticons7/21.gif
Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Nov. 15 2006,08:01)]Sour grapes come in many flavors. #Amazing, the guy tosses out an olive branch and the right wants to crucify him for it. #Just another reason the America is fed up with the right.
http://smiley.onegreatguy.net/cry2.gif http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/emoticons7/24.gif
Quote[/b] (wa6ccw @ Nov. 14 2006,17:05)]Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Nov. 15 2006,08:01)]And let's not mention a homo***ual predator.
Sour grapes come in many flavors. #Amazing, the guy tosses out an olive branch and the right wants to crucify him for it. #Just another reason the America is fed up with the right.
WOW! You're absolutely right!
Uh... just like THIS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Studds) guy, huh?
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/emoticons7/21.gif
John's point is well taken.
Reid tosses out an olive branch, and you guys want to bomb throw even BEFORE the Democrats take over!
What's pathetic is all this rhetoric you and WH are spewing is straight off talk radio talking points. Lots of "what if's" and no facts.
Wow, you really zinged NH with referencing something that happened over thirty years ago.
That's the best you can do? Conjecture and ancient scandal?
Dave NX6D
Sonoma County, CA
Quote[/b] (wa6ccw @ Nov. 14 2006,17:05)]Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Nov. 15 2006,08:01)]And let's not mention a homo***ual predator.
WOW! You're absolutely right!
Uh... just like THIS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Studds) guy, huh?
http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/emoticons7/21.gif
Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Nov. 15 2006,08:01)]Sour grapes come in many flavors. #Amazing, the guy tosses out an olive branch and the right wants to crucify him for it. #Just another reason the America is fed up with the right.
http://smiley.onegreatguy.net/cry2.gif http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/emoticons7/24.gif
Looks like YOU'RE doing the crying, CCW.
Keep marginalizing yourself. It's amusing.
Dave NX6D
Sonoma County, CA
wa6ccw
11-15-2006, 01:17 AM
Quote[/b] (nx6d @ Nov. 15 2006,08:10)]Wow, you really zinged NH with referencing something that happened over thirty years ago.
That's the best you can do? Conjecture and ancient scandal?
Dave NX6D
Sonoma County, CA
Scandal is scandal, Davey, and what's good for the goose is good for the gander...
People are people and corruption is corruption.
By the way, you don't seem very cheerful what with the glorious Democrat win and all..... why is that? http://smiley.onegreatguy.net/banana.gif
kg4kww
11-15-2006, 01:22 AM
This guys is a coward like the rest of the democrats and should be removed from office by the people
w2amr
11-15-2006, 01:25 AM
Quote[/b] (kg4kww @ Nov. 14 2006,18:22)]This guys is a coward like the rest of the democrats and should be removed from office by the people
Do you come up up with this stuff on your own, or do you have help?
Quote[/b] (wa6ccw @ Nov. 14 2006,17:17)]Quote[/b] (nx6d @ Nov. 15 2006,08:10)]Wow, you really zinged NH with referencing something that happened over thirty years ago.
That's the best you can do? Conjecture and ancient scandal?
Dave NX6D
Sonoma County, CA
Scandal is scandal, Davey, and what's good for the goose is good for the gander...
People are people and corruption is corruption.
By the way, you don't seem very cheerful what with the glorious Democrat win and all..... why is that? http://smiley.onegreatguy.net/banana.gif
I don't need to gloat, the results are what they are. I'm happy the election turned out the way it did, but I don't see the need to rub anyone's face in it.
As for scandal, you'd think with the history of the Studds thing (it happened in the '70's) Foley would have been smart enough to avoid the problem. I guess he wasn't.
"Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander"? Using that logic, everyone would still be talking about Nixon. The Studds thing was only slightly after the Nixon era scandals. I think trashing current Republicans over the sins of the Nixon era is inaccruate, unfair and ludicrous. Hauling out Studds' scandal that happened 30 years ago, falls into the same category when talking about Democrats.
Dave NX6D
Sonoma County, CA
2WH don't you guys check before posting this negative cr*p?
It's been done : * LINK * (http://www.qrz.com/ib-bin/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST;f=17;t=137759;)
Oh yes it needed that special neo-con spin - I think that sour grapes will not sell that well to most Americans dude.
wa6ccw
11-15-2006, 01:29 AM
Quote[/b] (nx6d @ Nov. 15 2006,08:11)]Keep marginalizing yourself. It's amusing.
Dave NX6D
Sonoma County, CA
Yeah, you're probably right...
I guess that's why you - more often than not - feel a need to respond to me, right?
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif
Quote[/b] (wa6ccw @ Nov. 14 2006,20:05)]Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Nov. 15 2006,08:01)]And let's not mention a homo***ual predator.
WOW! You're absolutely right!
Uh... just like THIS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Studds) guy, huh?
1973?? At least this should be in the same millenia. Wow, I never realized the neo-cons were not only dipsts, and negative but historians too. I can see that the Democrats will be in for a long time with all this negative stuff. Don't bet the house in '08. I think you'll be hard pressed to leave that loser image for years to come.
Let me give you some advice I got a few <s>years</s> weeks ago: Deal with it losers.
kg4kww
11-15-2006, 01:33 AM
Yep Harry is for the SF Pelosi crowd and for surrender to the Arabs.
Quote[/b] (kg4kww @ Nov. 14 2006,17:33)]Yep Harry is for the SF Pelosi crowd and for surrender to the Arabs.
Complete and total POPPYCOCK.
Let's see you PROVE that reprehensible soundbite, station. Without lame generalities please.
Just what is the "SF crowd" anyway? I can't wait for this answer.
Dave NX6D
Sonoma County, CA
60 miles north of SF
wa6ccw
11-15-2006, 01:37 AM
Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Nov. 15 2006,08:32)]Wow, I never realized the neo-cons were not only dipsts, and negative but historians too.
What "neo-cons"? http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
wa6ccw
11-15-2006, 01:41 AM
Quote[/b] (nx6d @ Nov. 15 2006,08:28)]Quote[/b] (wa6ccw @ Nov. 14 2006,17:17)]Quote[/b] (nx6d @ Nov. 15 2006,08:10)]Wow, you really zinged NH with referencing something that happened over thirty years ago.
That's the best you can do? Conjecture and ancient scandal?
Dave NX6D
Sonoma County, CA
Scandal is scandal, Davey, and what's good for the goose is good for the gander...
People are people and corruption is corruption.
By the way, you don't seem very cheerful what with the glorious Democrat win and all..... why is that? http://smiley.onegreatguy.net/banana.gif
I don't need to gloat, the results are what they are. I'm happy the election turned out the way it did, but I don't see the need to rub anyone's face in it.
As for scandal, you'd think with the history of the Studds thing (it happened in the '70's) Foley would have been smart enough to avoid the problem. I guess he wasn't.
"Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander"? Using that logic, everyone would still be talking about Nixon. The Studds thing was only slightly after the Nixon era scandals. I think trashing current Republicans over the sins of the Nixon era is inaccruate, unfair and ludicrous. Hauling out Studds' scandal that happened 30 years ago, falls into the same category when talking about Democrats.
Dave NX6D
Sonoma County, CA
Davey, the simple point that you seem to be missing here is that NO particular political party has a lock on "virtue"...
I'm not a member of the GOP because I think that they are pure and virtuous; and I certainly hope that you aren't peddling the notion that the Democrats - due to the simple fact that they are Democrats - are..?? http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif
KB9YCO
11-15-2006, 01:57 AM
I'd love to believe that the Democrats are truly liberal in the definition of the word, and that they truly want to work for the betterment of our country (a matter of opinion as to what 'better' is I suppose), but I can't imagine that either of the two big-wig political parties aren't going to wave the big stick around when they have it in order to prosper their various agendas, and mostly their powerplays.
It's a nice thought, but sadly, the reality of modern American politics shows otherwise. There may be little buttkissing for a little while, but eventually it will be back the same old business. Cynical? Perhaps, but probably more realistic than thinking that either party will truly embrace the other for a mutually beneficial lovefest. Like the same people that believed Bush was a 'compassionate conservative', as soon as he had the power he did whatever he wanted based on his extremist conservative agenda, and I hate to say it, but I'm sure the same will happen again. The problem is extremism and a political system based not on the betterment of society, but a fight for the most power, money and control.
wa6ccw
11-15-2006, 02:03 AM
Quote[/b] (KB9YCO @ Nov. 15 2006,08:57)]I'd love to believe that the Democrats are truly liberal in the definition of the word, and that they truly want to work for the betterment of our country (a matter of opinion as to what 'better' is I suppose), but I can't imagine that either of the two big-wig political parties aren't going to wave the big stick around when they have it in order to prosper their various agendas, and mostly their powerplays.
It's a nice thought, but sadly, the reality of modern American politics shows otherwise. There may be little buttkissing for a little while, but eventually it will be back the same old business. Cynical? Perhaps, but probably more realistic than thinking that either party will truly embrace the other for a mutually beneficial lovefest. Like the same people that believed Bush was a 'compassionate conservative', as soon as he had the power he did whatever he wanted based on his extremist conservative agenda, and I hate to say it, but I'm sure the same will happen again. The problem is extremism and a political system based not on the betterment of society, but a fight for the most power, money and control.
Well said. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif
Quote[/b] (wa6ccw @ Nov. 14 2006,20:37)]Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Nov. 15 2006,08:32)]Wow, I never realized the neo-cons were not only dipsts, and negative but historians too.
What "neo-cons"? http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
Jesus H. Ramirez! That folks is what to expect in '08. Let me know when neo-cons start looking at this millenium. This is where I came in.
C'ya
w2amr
11-15-2006, 09:34 AM
Quote[/b] (nx6d @ Nov. 14 2006,18:35)]Quote[/b] (kg4kww @ Nov. 14 2006,17:33)]Yep Harry is for the SF Pelosi crowd and for surrender to the Arabs.
Complete and total POPPYCOCK.
Let's see you PROVE that reprehensible soundbite, station. Without lame generalities please.
Just what is the "SF crowd" anyway? I can't wait for this answer.
Dave NX6D
Sonoma County, CA
60 miles north of SF
How about it Greg, I would like to hear the answer too.
kg4kww
11-15-2006, 05:06 PM
w2amr you know what the answer is. So, don't be scared, say it.
Looks like Reid and Murtha can start their own un-indicted co-conspirator caucus when the new Congress goes into session. Notice how the LIB media just happened to come up with this story AFTER the election.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/11/abramoff_report_1.html
Quote[/b] (K3XR @ Nov. 15 2006,14:59)]Looks like Reid and Murtha can start their own un-indicted co-conspirator caucus when the new Congress goes into session. Notice how the LIB media just happened to come up with this story AFTER the election.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/11/abramoff_report_1.html
This is an allegation. For some who believe Blogs to be facts, this might carry the same weight as a guilty verdict, but that has not yet happened. I know of websites that have blogs that allege the world is flat. We all know better don't we 3XR.
Hey Greg. You said it, what does that mean?
And if you think I know, well, the only thing I came up with was:
Do sealions eat seazebras? Narf!
w2amr
11-15-2006, 11:36 PM
Quote[/b] (K3XR @ Nov. 15 2006,12:59)]Looks like Reid and Murtha can start their own un-indicted co-conspirator caucus when the new Congress goes into session. Notice how the LIB media just happened to come up with this story AFTER the election.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/11/abramoff_report_1.html
The more I hear about MR. Murtha, the less I like Mr. Murtha.
w2amr
11-15-2006, 11:39 PM
Quote[/b] (kg4kww @ Nov. 15 2006,10:06)]w2amr you know what the answer is. So, don't be scared, say it.
YOU made the statement, not me. #I asked you to explain. So explain. Don't be scared.