PDA

View Full Version : Hollywood leftwing producer shows true colors

W4BCR
10-18-2006, 12:54 AM
Once again a facist neodem producer shows the hatred he feels for right thinking christians. This guy is typical of most of these neodems. Thank God for his honesty. I think the more he speaks, the more right thinking Americans will be angered, and vote Republican in their elections. Follow this link (http://www.townhall.com/ref/sorkin) for the story.
K1OU
10-18-2006, 01:15 AM
What exactly is a "facist"?


Sir, if you are going to call names, at least know the names which you are calling. Kind of helps with credibility.
n4sva
10-18-2006, 01:23 AM
Quote[/b] (K1OU @ Oct. 17 2006,18:15)]What exactly is a "facist"?
Tell us this Jerry. What's it like to be gainfully employed and what is life like outside of posting on QRZ forums?
K1OU
10-18-2006, 01:34 AM
Quote[/b] (n4sva @ Oct. 17 2006,18:23)]Quote[/b] (K1OU @ Oct. 17 2006,18:15)]What exactly is a "facist"?
Tell us this Jerry. What's it like to be gainfully employed and what is life like outside of posting on QRZ forums?
Are you trying to insult me? I see how it is. Because you don't agree with me, I must have no job and no life. You'll have to try a lot harder than that to bother me.
n2ize
10-18-2006, 02:05 AM
Firstr of all I wouldn;ttake anything that "townhall.com" says to heart. Any publication that can toute the likes of the highly discredited and absurd Ann Coulter is not worthy of serious consideration.

Actually Mr Sorkin is considered one of the most brilliant producers to come along in decades. His so called "attack on christians" is merely a mock up ofd the extremism and absurdities that has crept into modern day christianity. Most people see it for the humor it entails. If "townhall.com" see's a need to make a federal case out of it then that's their problem.

Incidentally, if we are going to refer to Mr.Sorkin as fascist then we might as well get the definition of "fascism" down correctly...


2. an authoritarian system of government under absolute
control of a single dictator, allowing no political
opposition, forcibly suppressing dissent, and rigidly
controlling most industrial and economic activities. Such
regimes usually try to achieve popularity by a strongly
nationalistic appeal, often mixed with racism.



Hardly describes Sorkin don't you think ?
W3MIV
10-18-2006, 02:10 AM
Quote[/b] (K1OU @ Oct. 17 2006,21:15)]What exactly is a "facist"?


Sir, if you are going to call names, at least know the names which you are calling. #Kind of helps with credibility.
Moment of truth, Jerry: If you are going to call people down about spelling you are going to have a big chore correcting the posts of your own rooting gallery.
K1OU
10-18-2006, 02:15 AM
Quote[/b] (W3MIV @ Oct. 17 2006,19:10)]Quote[/b] (K1OU @ Oct. 17 2006,21:15)]What exactly is a "facist"?


Sir, if you are going to call names, at least know the names which you are calling. #Kind of helps with credibility.
Moment of truth, Jerry: If you are going to call people down about spelling you are going to have a big chore correcting the posts of your own rooting gallery.
Fair enough. Well taken.
KG4CGC
10-18-2006, 02:26 AM
Keep acting like a peoples divided and you'll gladly give up your constitutional rights.
K6UEY
10-18-2006, 02:42 AM
Charles,
We are a people divided,the more the Liberal/Socialist try to get a permanet foothold the more the intelligent people will rebel.

We already have a couple of brain washed generations who were taught Socialism in the educational system. They know no better, as they have not the experience nor the knowledge to make a valid decision for themselves.

They do recognize that what they people want is not what they have been taught, that makes them fight even harder for their beliefs.

YES we are a people divided. United we stand against the World, but divided we all go down together !! http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif




http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wow.gif #http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
K1OU
10-18-2006, 02:46 AM
Quote[/b] (K6UEY @ Oct. 17 2006,19:42)]We are a people divided,the more the Liberal/Socialist try to get a permanet foothold the more the intelligent people will rebel.
Time for the 'UEY translator...

"Mommy, he started it!"
K0RGR
10-18-2006, 02:57 AM
The original post here falls clearly in the category of "lunatic fringe"

It is not helpful to debate or throw rotten fruit at the lunatic fringe and their fans.
KI6FFF
10-18-2006, 05:20 AM
Quote[/b] (K1OU @ Oct. 16 2006,19:15)]What exactly is a "facist"?


Sir, if you are going to call names, at least know the names which you are calling. #Kind of helps with credibility.
Why address someone's post by attacking a typo or spelling error? If you have an opinion opposite the person initiating the post, address it and not the error.

It makes you look petty.
kc7jty
10-18-2006, 06:16 AM
Quote[/b] (K6UEY @ Oct. 17 2006,19:42)]United we stand against the World,
Nice mindset UEY. Too bad your kind feel we have to be opposed to the entire world.

It's the neocons who have taken a stand against the world. It will not succeed. Unfortunately it is ALL of us who will fall with them and their uninformed decision.

On Frontline tonight "The lost year in Iraq" had some real eye openers for the viewer. I can't mention what I found the most informative because it might ruin someone. I can say however that it fully supports my convictions as to this country's greatest problem at the moment.
Did anyone else see the show?
kc7jty
10-18-2006, 06:21 AM
Quote[/b] (K6UEY @ Oct. 17 2006,19:42)]We are a people divided,the more the Liberal/Socialist try to get a permanet foothold the more the intelligent people will rebel.
Like the intelligent republican leadership and their supporters I suppose?
KI4PEQ
10-18-2006, 06:41 AM
Just because someone is a Republican doesn't make him or her a Bush lackey.

Just because someone is a Democrat doesn't mean they want Hillary in the White House.

There's a lot of people who don't walk lock-step with the leadership of EITHER party.
kc7jty
10-18-2006, 06:47 AM
Quote[/b] (KI4PEQ @ Oct. 17 2006,23:41)]Just because someone is a Republican doesn't make him or her a Bush lackey.
Are you saying the republicans voted democrat in the last 2 Bush elections? Give me a break.
ANYONE who votes is a ####ing lackey.
k9kxq
10-18-2006, 07:10 AM
Quote[/b] (KI6FFF @ Oct. 18 2006,00:20)]Quote[/b] (K1OU @ Oct. 16 2006,19:15)]What exactly is a "facist"?


Sir, if you are going to call names, at least know the names which you are calling. #Kind of helps with credibility.
Why address someone's post by attacking a typo or spelling error? #If you have an opinion opposite the person initiating the post, address it and not the error. #

It makes you look petty.
That goes both ways OM, I've been chastised and made fun of by neo cons for spelling errors right here on this forum...

kxq
KI6FFF
10-18-2006, 08:00 AM
What does OM mean?
k9kxq
10-18-2006, 12:24 PM
Quote[/b] (KI6FFF @ Oct. 18 2006,03:00)]What does OM mean?
How long have you been licensed? surely you jest or are you that green...

kxq
KI6FFF
10-18-2006, 12:32 PM
TNC since Aug 06. GREEN, NOOOB, BOOT....
k9kxq
10-18-2006, 12:42 PM
Quote[/b] (KI6FFF @ Oct. 18 2006,07:32)]TNC since Aug 06. #GREEN, NOOOB, BOOT....
OK, then your honest and I give you a honest answer...

It's used by many hams,OM = Old Man... http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

Welcome to the fraternity of amateur radio...

kxq
KI6FFF
10-18-2006, 12:44 PM
Quote[/b] (k9kxq @ Oct. 17 2006,06:42)]Quote[/b] (KI6FFF @ Oct. 18 2006,07:32)]TNC since Aug 06. #GREEN, NOOOB, BOOT....
OK, then your honest and I give you a honest answer...

It's used by many hams,OM = Old Man... http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

Welcome to the fraternity of amateur radio...

kxq
Ya know, that's funny, I was thinking that's what it meant but had to ask anyways. Thanks.
k9kxq
10-18-2006, 12:45 PM
Quote[/b] (KI6FFF @ Oct. 18 2006,07:44)]Quote[/b] (k9kxq @ Oct. 17 2006,06:42)]Quote[/b] (KI6FFF @ Oct. 18 2006,07:32)]TNC since Aug 06. #GREEN, NOOOB, BOOT....
OK, then your honest and I give you a honest answer...

It's used by many hams,OM = Old Man... http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

Welcome to the fraternity of amateur radio...

kxq
Ya know, that's funny, I was thinking that's what it meant but had to ask anyways. #Thanks.
No problem, now get busy and learn the code, get your general and have a load of fun....

kxq
KI6FFF
10-18-2006, 12:46 PM
you betcha
n2nh
10-18-2006, 02:42 PM
Quote[/b] (W4BCR @ Oct. 17 2006,20:54)]Once again a <span style='color:red'>facist neodem</span> producer shows the hatred he feels for right thinking christians. This guy is typical of most of these <span style='color:red'>neodems</span>. Thank God for his honesty. I think the more he speaks, the more right thinking Americans will be angered, and vote Republican in their elections. Follow this link (http://www.townhall.com/ref/sorkin) for the story.
Wow, where is middle-of-the-road SY's outrage on all this name-calling?? I guess it's just more of those 'conservative rights' we've been hearing about. We can, but you better not. &quot;right thinking christians?&quot; Nothing like divisive religiousness. &quot;left thinking christians&quot; &quot;right thinking christians&quot; &quot;moderate thinking christians&quot;... last one to go to heaven shut off the light. Ah, nothing like more of the same from the outhouse of the lunatic fringe.

This is sounding really desparate guys. http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif
K7JEM
10-18-2006, 06:18 PM
I consider myself a &quot;right thinking Christian&quot;, but my definition probably differs from what most people think. I also consider myself a &quot;conservative&quot;, but maybe not &quot;neocoderthal&quot;. I did vote for Bush in the last two elections, but look who the dems fielded.

I like Sorkin's shows, at least the WW, and this new one. On the WW, there was a president who was portrayed as a liberal, and he did liberal things. There were other people who were portrayed as conservative, and did typical conservative things. He seemed to make as much fun of the libs as he did the cons, well maybe biased slightly lib. It wasn't all one way, and they showed a lot of &quot;dirty tricks&quot; and &quot;coverups&quot; or attempts to hide the truth by the liberal administration. They showed the same things by the conservative opposition. This was all fictional, but had some basis in fact.

This new show has promise, but it's probably too early to tell. It almost looks like a lot of the same cast from the WW, but I don't really see anything out of line. You would expect that people in the TV production business are probably somewhat anti-Christian, and would make fun of those peolple on their show (real or fictional), You would also expect the network censors to have a problem with a &quot;crazy Christian&quot; theme, although I've personally met a few of them.

Anyway, it's just TV. It is trying to portray something as an event which could readily happen, and it does succeed at that. It's fault may be that its trying to be TOO topical for fictional TV.

Joe