View Full Version : Since I've Aroused the Topic of Republicans
KA8NCR
10-01-2006, 05:37 PM
Just more government stupidity. Relax gang, it's bi-partisan stupidity.
Viagra and You (http://www.liberty-watch.com/volume02/issue06/givemeabreak.php)
K8EEI
10-01-2006, 05:53 PM
The food and drug corps run the country , the media , And the govt ....Dems & Reps - it doesn't matter .
I thought everybody knew that .
w8cbc
10-01-2006, 07:29 PM
For a country so uptight about sex to be subsidising joint stiffener does rather boggle.
Say, would Rush be in the boneless chickenhawk category? http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
w2amr
10-01-2006, 08:10 PM
Quote[/b] (w8cbc @ Oct. 01 2006,12:29)]For a country so uptight about sex to be subsidising joint stiffener does rather boggle.
Say, would Rush be in the boneless chickenhawk category? #http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
KI4PEQ
10-02-2006, 10:10 PM
Normally I agree with most of what John Stossel says.
But takng this to the logical conclusion, if taxpayer money is used, ED medication should not be funded, nor should birth control pills, diaphragms, contraceptive foam, or condoms. The Department of Defense pays for ALL of these items in support of the health needs of the military. As a military retiree, I am also entitled to support from the military health care system.
But since there are people who believe that sexual dysfunction drugs or contraception are conditions that should not be paid for by government money, let's just tell the people that use these items that they can either abstain from sexual relations altogether or just forget about marital relations. After all, no one NEEDS to have sex!
All those who can live without sex please raise their hands.... I don't see a lot of hands up!
Quote[/b] (w2amr @ Oct. 01 2006,16:10)]Quote[/b] (w8cbc @ Oct. 01 2006,12:29)]For a country so uptight about sex to be subsidising joint stiffener does rather boggle.
Say, would Rush be in the boneless chickenhawk category? http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
http://www.qrz.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
Wow, I guess that matches his spinelessness?
w8cbc
10-02-2006, 10:40 PM
KI4PEQ: Quote[/b] ]All those who can live without sex please raise their hands.... I don't see a lot of hands up!
I can live without and have for years at a time. I prefer not to do without - but it is not essential to life.
As to the "necessity" of reproduction - there are too damned many of us already.
w8cbc
10-02-2006, 11:17 PM
Quote[/b] (n2nh @ Oct. 02 2006,15:18)]Wow, I guess that matches his spinelessness?
Do chickenhawks have spines to begin with? I rather get the impression that they flock the way they do because they cannot stand on their own. Each needs reinforcement from the rest.
KC2PBJ
10-03-2006, 01:50 AM
Hey! If it lasts longer then four hours, don't call your doctor. ENJOY IT with a few friends over for the evening. Nothing is worse than assault with a dead weapon.:p
w8cbc
10-03-2006, 05:13 PM
Heehee.
A typical early-morning scene with that crazy woman:
(wheeze)
Had enough yet?
(collapse)
I was quite surprised when I found my medical insurance specifically listed and in bold lettering, prescription payment for VIAGRA. #However, they do not cover birth control pills. #Go figure.
I guess they want it easy instead of HARD to make the wife pregnant.
K2WH
w8cbc
10-04-2006, 04:54 AM
I see it as a Boomer thing.
The problem with their joints not working is much more serious than unwanted teenage pregnancies.
They were the "Hell No We Won't Go!" generation.
Now they're the "No Way We Won't Pay!" generation.