ab0wr
08-05-2006, 05:11 PM
I was recently going through FEMA training course is-288 to see what was in it. The course is titled: "The Role of Voluntary Agencies in Emergency Management".
Imagine my surprise when I found the following quotes concerning Amateur Radio (the only mentions of Amateur Radio in the document, BTW).
Quote[/b] ]Radio Communication Services: Some voluntary agencies have licensed radio amateurs to provide emergency radio communication to fellow agencies and local government personnel who are responding to the disaster.
Quote[/b] ]American Radio Relay League (ARRL) The American Radio Relay League responds when communication lines are damaged or destroyed during disaters. ARRL is a national volunteer organization of licensed radio amateurs in the United States. ARRL-sponsored Amateur Radio Emergency Services (ARES) provide volunteer radio communications services to Federal, State, County, and local governments, as well as to voluntary agencies. Members volunteer not only their services but also their privately owned radio communications equipment.
What happened to the "value of the amateur service to the public" as quoted in Part 97?
What happened to the provision of health and welfare communications for the public so that loved ones can be informed of the status of victims?
It's just like I was taught in government class so many years ago: "we the people" doesn't mean "we the government". The same thing applies to Part 97, "the public" doesn't mean "the government" or "the NGO's".
This training document should stress to the public that amateur radio provides a valuable role in providing communications out of a disaster area TO EVERY INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN, not just to government agencies and NGO's.
If we, the amateur radio community, *really* want amateur radio to survive in the future, we need to make the public aware of how we can help them *individually* during a disaster. Just being recognized as a backup common carrier for use by government agencies and NGO's won't cut it. We need to make it understood to the public that when "Mabel" has been flooded out and has lost her phone book and her internet email address book, that amateur radio could play a key role in notifying her relatives that she is ok. #
Why doesn't this FEMA training document stress this role for amateur radio? Where did they get the information that was put in the document? Could it have been from the ARRL?
What recommendations do *you* have for getting FEMA to *really* recognize in IS-288 what the Amateur Radio Service (as opposed to the ARRL) has to offer during disasters?
Oh, BTW, amateur radio is not recognized as the Amateur Radio Service in this document. All references are titled Amateur Radio Relay League. As if all amateurs volunteering their time and money during disasters are ARRL members. Funny, huh?
tim ab0wr
Imagine my surprise when I found the following quotes concerning Amateur Radio (the only mentions of Amateur Radio in the document, BTW).
Quote[/b] ]Radio Communication Services: Some voluntary agencies have licensed radio amateurs to provide emergency radio communication to fellow agencies and local government personnel who are responding to the disaster.
Quote[/b] ]American Radio Relay League (ARRL) The American Radio Relay League responds when communication lines are damaged or destroyed during disaters. ARRL is a national volunteer organization of licensed radio amateurs in the United States. ARRL-sponsored Amateur Radio Emergency Services (ARES) provide volunteer radio communications services to Federal, State, County, and local governments, as well as to voluntary agencies. Members volunteer not only their services but also their privately owned radio communications equipment.
What happened to the "value of the amateur service to the public" as quoted in Part 97?
What happened to the provision of health and welfare communications for the public so that loved ones can be informed of the status of victims?
It's just like I was taught in government class so many years ago: "we the people" doesn't mean "we the government". The same thing applies to Part 97, "the public" doesn't mean "the government" or "the NGO's".
This training document should stress to the public that amateur radio provides a valuable role in providing communications out of a disaster area TO EVERY INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN, not just to government agencies and NGO's.
If we, the amateur radio community, *really* want amateur radio to survive in the future, we need to make the public aware of how we can help them *individually* during a disaster. Just being recognized as a backup common carrier for use by government agencies and NGO's won't cut it. We need to make it understood to the public that when "Mabel" has been flooded out and has lost her phone book and her internet email address book, that amateur radio could play a key role in notifying her relatives that she is ok. #
Why doesn't this FEMA training document stress this role for amateur radio? Where did they get the information that was put in the document? Could it have been from the ARRL?
What recommendations do *you* have for getting FEMA to *really* recognize in IS-288 what the Amateur Radio Service (as opposed to the ARRL) has to offer during disasters?
Oh, BTW, amateur radio is not recognized as the Amateur Radio Service in this document. All references are titled Amateur Radio Relay League. As if all amateurs volunteering their time and money during disasters are ARRL members. Funny, huh?
tim ab0wr